Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine / 2015 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 103985 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/103985

Nan Li, Jianping Wang, Jun Ma, Zhiqiang Gu, Chao Jiang, Lie Yu, Xiaojie Fu, "Neuroprotective Effects of Cistanches Herba Therapy on Patients with Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease", Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 103985, 12 pages, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/103985

Neuroprotective Effects of Cistanches Herba Therapy on Patients with Moderate Alzheimer’s Disease

Academic Editor: José L. Ríos
Received09 Jun 2015
Revised30 Jul 2015
Accepted02 Aug 2015
Published07 Sep 2015


Cistanches Herba (CH) is thought to be a “Yang-invigorating” material in traditional Chinese medicine. We evaluated neuroprotective effects of Cistanches Herba on Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients. Moderate AD participants were divided into 3 groups: Cistanches Herba capsule (CH, ), Donepezil tablet (DON, ), and control group without treatment . We assessed efficacy by MMSE and ADAS-cog, and investigated the volume changes of hippocampus by 1.5 T MRI scans. Protein, mRNA levels, and secretions of total-tau (T-tau), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and interleukin- (IL) 1β (IL-1β) in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) were detected by Western blot, RT-PCR, and ELISA. The scores showed statistical difference after 48 weeks of treatment compared to control group. Meanwhile, volume changes of hippocampus were slight in drug treatment groups but distinct in control group; the levels of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β were decreased compared to those in control group. Cistanches Herba could improve cognitive and independent living ability of moderate AD patients, slow down volume changes of hippocampus, and reduce the levels of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β. It suggested that Cistanches Herba had potential neuroprotective effects for moderate AD.

1. Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a series of clinical syndrome caused by neurodegeneration that is characterized by progressive deterioration in cognitive ability and capacity for independent living. It is estimated that there are about 28.4 million people of AD worldwide in 2010 [1]. Now no disease-modifying therapies to prevent or treat AD are available. Hyperphosphorylated tau protein that is aggregating intracellularly in the AD brain and building neurofibrillary tangles and amyloid-beta (Aβ) protein that is accumulating extracellular in the AD brain and building cortical senile plaques are the main neuropathological marks of AD. Increased contents of total-tau (T-tau) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been consistently demonstrated in AD [2]. The progressive atrophy of various brain regions in AD is also widely observed, particularly in the hippocampus which is a region involved in cognition, memory, and learning. Postmortem reports showed early neuropathological lesions and neuronal loss in hippocampus [3]. As magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can structurally track hippocampus atrophy in the mid- and late-states of AD, it can be another marker of AD [4]. Recently neuroinflammation from abnormally activated neuroglia emerged as an important mechanism of AD process [5]. The increased levels of Aβ and the deposition cause chronic activation of the immune system and disorder of microglial clearance functions. The epidemiological data indicated a key role in activation of the native immune system as a disease-promoting factor [6]. The cytokines are believed to participate in the accumulation of amyloid plaques and accelerate the harmful effects of Aβ through involvement in inflammatory process [7]. Increasing evidences reveal that brain can initiate a well-regulated immune response to injury [8, 9] and motivate the peripheral immune cells [10, 11]. Circulating cytokines can cross the blood brain barrier (BBB) by saturable transport mechanism [12, 13]. TNF-α, IL-1β, and proinflammatory cytokines have already been proved to be induced in mice brains by ionizing radiation [14, 15]. In addition, IL-1β may have different effects on CNS cells: low concentration of IL-1β has protective effects on cultured cortical neurons against excitotoxicity, but high concentration of IL-1β has neurotoxic effects [16]. Numerous researches suggest a central role of proinflammatory cytokines in CNS inflammation [1721], and the high levels of those cytokines may cause neuronal damage in AD brain [22]. Currently some anti-inflammatory therapeutic ideas of the treatment in AD have been proposed.

Cistanches Herba (CH), holoparasitic plant of Cistanche deserticola Y.C. Ma which is characterized as the major material to tonify the kidney and a “Yang-invigorating” material in traditional Chinese medicine theory [23]. It is widely used to treat forgetfulness and loss of hearing, increase the strength of reproduction, and develop fertility function. The previous studies have demonstrated that CH has different pharmacological activities: antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects [2426]. The primary active compounds in CH are phenylethanoid glycosides: such as verbascoside and Echinacoside [27], which are thought to have some effects on center nervous system (CNS). Studies have reported that verbascoside shows neuroprotective effects against 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridium (MPP+) 5 which has been proved to induce memory deficits significantly in vivo [28]. Echinacoside can rescue SH-SY5Y neuronal cells following TNF-α induced apoptosis and improve behavioral defects in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease [29, 30].

Since CH has been used to treat forgetfulness for many years and its compounds have some effects on CNS, it maybe also has the neuroprotective effects on AD. In our study, we analyzed patients’ cognitive and behavioral capacities and evaluated the effects on T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β. Potential effects of CH against neurodegeneration were observed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients

All the patients provided a written informed consent. This study was carried out in accordance with the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki) and was approved by the ethics committee of Zhengzhou University (date: November 10, 2012).

26 participants were chosen from the second affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University and the fifth affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University from 2013 to 2014. They had similar education background and the mid-value length of symptoms before diagnosis was 1.5 years. Each participant included in our study had undergone a series of clinical interviews and examinations by the neurologist. Inclusion criteria were MMSE and ADAS-cog, from 10 to 20 and 29 to 40. Exclusion criteria were acute or chronic infection, original inflammatory disease, oncogenesis, therapy of Donepezil, memantine hydrochloride or Ginkgo biloba leaf, therapy of anti-inflammatory drug or corticosteroids, and C-reactive protein (CRP) level 10 mg/L.

A total of 20 AD patients were constituted in drug therapy: CH treatment group: oral administration of Cistanches Herba capsule 48 weeks (0.9 g/day, each person, ) and DON treatment group: oral administration of Donepezil tablet 48 weeks (5 mg/day, each person, ). Six patients were enrolled as the control group (no treatment, ). All participants agreed and were informed to take Cistanches Herba (CH) capsule (0.3 g/capsule, 3 capsules per day, LYYLYD pharmaceuticals Company, Changchun, China), Donepezil tablet (5 mg/tablet, 1 tablet per day, Eisai China Inc., Suzhou, China), or nothing, respectively. All patients had no any drug therapies before this study.

2.2. Cognitive Abilities Tests

All of the assessments were given before and after the treatments by blinded assessors.

2.2.1. Minimental State Examination (MMSE)

MMSE was designed to evaluate the cognitive function of participant. It was composed of 30-point questionnaire tests in the scores that showed the changes in cognitive state. The range of MMSE score was from 0 to 30, and lower scores indicated greater severity of disease [31].

2.2.2. Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog)

ADAS-cog was used to evaluate cognitive impairment in AD patients, the range of total scores was from 0 to 90, and higher scores indicated more serious of the disease [32].

Each patient had received a standardized medical evaluation that included MMSE and ADAS-cog before the medical treatment, at the time point after 24 weeks treatment and the time point after 48 weeks treatment. All data were computed according to criterion scoring instructions.

Mean scores were calculated and one-way ANOVA test was used to analyze differences among groups.

2.3. MRI

For each participant, MRI scans were performed on a GE 1.5 T Signa HDxt MRI scanner (General Electric Company, Fairfield, CT, USA). The MRI sequence was under the condition: TR = 11.6 ms, TE = 5 ms, spatial resolution = 0.94 mm, and slice thickness = 1.2 mm. All images were analyzed by using the software packages Analyze (Mayo Foundation, 1999) and Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM99, Institute of Neurology, London, UK, exclusively used to measure volume of total gray matter) [33]. Hippocampal morphometry was managed by neuroradiologists (hand tracing) who were blind to diagnosis. Hippocampal outlines were drawn in the arrow-headed view using the “region of interest” tool implemented in the software Analyze. After having finished the drawing for all arrow-headed slices where the hippocampus was visible, the correctness of the horizontal was administrated in the coronal and sagittal views. Then, bilateral hippocampal volumes and the total brain volumes were determined using an automatic algorithm programmed in MATLAB and SPM99.

2.4. Lumbar Puncture

We collected the cerebrospinal fluid of patients at three time points: before the drug treatment, 24 weeks after treatment, and 48 weeks after treatment. None of the participants had lumbar puncture contraindications. Before performing the puncture, everyone should be told of the procedure along with potential risks and benefits and showed the consent from his or her guardian. The patient was in lying position with the back flexed. Next, the puncture point which was located in the intersection between the superior aspects of the iliac crest and the spine (L4 spinous level) was found. The landmark of the interspace between L3 and L4 space level was labeled. This location was below the termination of the spinal cord and much safer for this operation. Local anesthetic was infiltrated subcutaneously and spinal needle at the anatomical landmark was injected along the intended path. Eight milliliters fluid were collected and stored at −80°C for further test. When an adequate specimen was obtained, needle was removed and the patient lied flat for another 6 hours.

2.5. Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-PCR)

We used the Trizol reagent (CWBIO, Beijing, China) to extract total RNA from the CSF of the participants according to the manufacturer’s instruction and generated first-strand cDNA by ThermoScript RT-PCR System (Invitrogen, Grand Island, New York, USA) with 1 μL random hexamer primer, 2 μL 10 mM dNTP-Mix, 0.1 M DTT, and 1 μL ThermoScript RT in DEPC-treated water to a 20 μL final reaction volume. Then reaction mixture denatured it at 63°C for 5 minutes, followed at 45°C at 50 minutes, and stored at −20°C.

According to the data of gene bank, we designed the primers and synthesized them by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China): T-tau, forward: 5′-CAAAGCTCGCATGGTCAGT A-3′ and reverse: 5′-AGGGTTGGATCAGAGGGTCT-3′; TNF-α, forward: 5′-AGGC AATAGGTTTTGAGGGCCAT-3′ and reverse: 5′-GGGACACACAAGCATCAAGGA TAC-3′; IL-1β, forward: 5′-TGGCAGGTTCCTGATTT-3′ and reverse: 5′-AACTTGTT CGACAA CCCTC-3′; control GADPH, forward: 5′-GGUCAUCCAUGACAAC UUUTT-3′ and reverse: 5′-AAAGUUGUCAUGGAUGACCTT-3′. These expression levels of mRNA were measured with RT-PCR. The reaction mixture consisted of 1 μg of sample cDNA, 1 μL primer, 2 μL of 10 mM dNTPs, 25 μL Taq DNA polymerase (Sangon Biotech), and DEPC-Treated water to final volume of 50 μL. The PCR conditions were 98°C for 30 seconds (denaturation), 55–58°C for 30 seconds (annealing), and 72°C for 60 seconds (extension) for 30 cycles and then at 72°C for 10 minutes, stored it at 4°C. The fragments obtained were confirmed by 1.0% agarose gel electrophoresis. The PCR products sizes of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β were 188 bp, 560 bp, and 298 bp.

2.6. Western Blot

Protein preparation for Western blot assay [34] is as follows: 1 mL sample of CSF sample added with 250 μL of 50% trichloroacetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri, USA) was centrifuged at 17,000 ×g at 4°C for 20 minutes; After supernatents were discarded, the pellet was washed with ethyl ether (Merck Co, Kenilworth, New Jersey, USA), and the dissolved protein pellet was in a solution including 4% CHAPS, 40 mmol/L Tris base, 8 mol/L urea, and 100 mmol/L dithiothreitol. After the precipitation of CSF samples, 50 μg of the protein lysate mixed with buffer was denatured at 70°C for 10 minutes. Then, the protein was electrophoretically separated on 12% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred onto an Immobilon-P polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes (Amersham Biosciences, Bath, UK). The membranes were blocked in 5% nonfat milk in Tris-Buffered Saline (TBS) for 1 hour at room temperature (RT) and then incubated with primary antibody in TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 overnight at 4°C. After the membrane was washed three times with TBST, it was incubated with the secondary antibody for 1 hour at RT. Human monoclonal β-actin antibody (1 : 5000, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a loading control. An enhanced chemiluminescence system (Sigma-Aldrich) was used for the visualisation and quantification. Imager Gel Doc System and Quantity One Software (Bio-Rad, Richmond, California, USA) were used to analyze the densitometric intensities.

2.7. Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)

Concentrations of T-tau were measured by sandwich ELISA (Innotest hTAU-Ag; Innogenetics, Ghent, Belgium). TNF-α and IL-1β were tested by ELISA using human cytokine/chemokine Luminex kits (for TNF-α and IL-1β) from Millipore (St-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Yvelines, France). All experiments were performed as recommended according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The 96-well plates were prewet and incubated in with 200 μL of assay buffer for 10 minutes at 37°C. Samples were added in duplicate to the suitable wells. And assay buffer was used as blank control. Plates which were loaded with magnetic microbead solution priorly were sealed and incubated with agitation on a plate shaker at 750 rpm at 4°C in darkroom. 200 μL of wash buffer was used to wash each well twice and 25 μL of detection antibodies was added per well. Plate was incubated on a plate shaker at 750 rpm for 1 h at 37°C in darkroom and then washed twice by 200 μL of wash buffer again. Microbeads were resuspended in sheath fluid 100 μL per well of on plate shaker at 450 rpm for 10 minutes at 37°C. Values were read at 450 nm on a microplate reader (BioRad).

2.8. Statistical Analysis

All experiments data were analyzed by SPSS 13.0 software. Quantitative data were presented as mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA test was used to analyze differences in cognitive abilities, volume of hippocampus, T-tau, TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA levels, and protein expressions and concentrations obtained by ELISA among groups. Bonferroni was used between the two-group comparison. The least significant difference (LSD) was used to compare difference between the two groups. was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Cistanches Herba Could Improve Cognitive Abilities

10 of the 11 participants in the CH group (the retention rate was 90.1% and the attrition rate was 9.9% and one patient quitted this study because of serious vomiting), 8 of the 9 participants in the Don group (the retention rate was 88.9% and the attrition rate was 11.1% and one patient quitted because of peptic ulcer), and 6 of the 6 participants in the control group (the retention rate was 100%) completed the 48 weeks open-label pilot study. The clinical characteristics of AD patients were presented in Table 1. AD participants with drug treatments or without therapies had their cognitive abilities evaluated by MMSE and ADAS-cog, at the follow-up period (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). The measure in drug treatment groups showed higher scores using MMSE and lower scores using ADAS-cog at 48 weeks (), compared with control group. However, there were no obvious differences among groups at 24 weeks, and the data showed little difference between CH and DON groups ().

DON group ()CH group ()control ()

Gender (%women)62.56050
Education (years)14.6 ± 3.915.5 ± 3.415.7 ± 2.9
Age (years)73.5 ± 5.070.3 ± 6.471.3 ± 5.4

3.2. Cistanches Herba Could Slow Down Hippocampus Atrophy

The volume of bilateral hippocampus (HIP) in control group measured at 48 weeks was 4.2% below the mean of data measured at 0 weeks. And there were no visible volume changes of hippocampus in drug treatment groups (Figures 2(a)2(f)).

3.3. Cistanches Herba Could Reduce the Expression of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β mRNAs and the Proteins Levels of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β

T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β mRNAs were downregulated significantly in CH treatment group and DON treatment group, respectively (Figures 3(a)3(c)) during 48 weeks. The levels of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β mRNAs showed a diminishing tendency (Figures 3(d)3(f)). T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β proteins also declined in CH treatment group and DON treatment group compared to control (Figures 4(a)4(g)). No differences were found in either expressions of mRNAs or protein levels between CH treatment group and DON treatment group, indicating Cistanches Herba could reduce T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β mRNAs and protein levels as the same effects as Donepezil did.

3.4. Cistanches Herba Could Inhibit the Secretions of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β

Cistanches Herba was reported to be involved in many types of inflammatory diseases [35]. We measured the contents of TNF-α and IL-1β in CSF by ELISA. Meanwhile, we assessed concentrations of T-tau in CSF by ELISA. Compared with the control group, T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels in CSF were lower () in treatment groups, as shown in Figures 5(a)5(c), indicating that Cistanches Herba could reduce T-tau levels and inhibit inflammatory factor such as TNF-α and IL-1β secretions in AD pathologic process. Between two treatment groups, T-tau, TNF-α, or IL-1β contents had no statistical difference (), suggesting that both drugs could reduce T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β levels and the effect of Cistanches Herba was the same as Donepezil. Compared with the control group, T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β contents in the treatment groups had a decreasing tendency.

4. Discussion

Our studies showed that Cistanches Herba could improve cognitive abilities, slow down hippocampus atrophy, and reduce the contents of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β in the CSF of moderate AD patients. We analyzed relative hippocampal volumes performed by the quotient of hippocampal and total brain volume and made the correctness of the horizontal by being controlled in the coronal and sagittal views. It was maximumly able to reduce errors. No previous researchers had reported the neuroprotective effects of Cistanches Herba on AD patients. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to explore the therapeutic effects of Cistanches Herba in AD patients.

“Yin/Yang Theory” is a classic structure of Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), which believes the human body structure is an organic entity and the universe is a unity of opposing strength, that is, Yin and Yang. According to Yin/Yang Theory, Qi is classified to Yang, while the essence, blood, and body fluids belong to Yin. All of them build the basis of the human body. With the Yin/Yang concept, TCM explains clinical symptoms and guides treatment of diseases. Yang/Qi drives the biological activities in the human body and enhances energy in human organs. Shortages in Yang/Qi display an important role in Alzheimer’s disease [36]. Cistanches Herba is thought as a material of Yang-invigoration in human body. It may be a treatment choice to AD. In our study, we tried to observe the effects of Cistanches Herba on AD by the theory of Western medicine. Meanwhile, we choose Donepezil to compare with Cistanches Herba to evaluate its medicine effects. Donepezil, a well-known acetylcholinesterase inhibitor (AChE) approved by FDA, was proved to protect from the Aβ and tau toxicity in animal models and cell [37]. The 1-year, placebo-controlled trial had revealed that donepezil-treated patients attenuated by about half as much as the placebo-treated patients on a global rating of dementia symptoms [38]. And the prior research demonstrated that an administration of donepezil to AD patients for 1 month led to decreased levels of IL-6 and IL-1 in mononuclear cells of peripheral blood, indicating the anti-inflammatory influence of this agent. Donepezil also had proved the anti-inflammatory effects in apolipoprotein E-knockout mice that showed restrained expression of TNF-α in the aorta [39].

We studied the influence of Cistanches Herba in order to investigate whether it could play a key role in the pathophysiology of AD in CSF. A significant statistical difference of cognitive abilities between drug treatment groups and control group was observed. Mohs et al. [40] also reported that Donepezil benefits in enhancing cognitive abilities of AD. The analysis of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β expressions in CSF we performed showed that all of them changed significantly during 48 weeks by the therapies. Our findings showed the mRNA expressions of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β and the levels of these proteins reduced after the therapy by Cistanches Herba, and there were decreasing tendencies with the prolongation of treatment time. It suggested Cistanches Herba could cross blood-brain barrier (BBB) and involved the pathological process of AD. Cistanches Herba may be able to restore a normal brain regulatory network.

Recent studies reported that carbohydrates in Cistanches Herba had central nervous system (CNS) effects and it could inhibit inflammatory cytokines activities [24, 41]. It may be due to some kinds of active ingredients. Phenylethanoid glycosides (PhGs), separated and purified from Cistanches Herba, are regarded as the primary bioactive elements, which many studies have shown that they have broad biological effects involving antibacterial, cytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and neuroprotective activities. In Mannami’s study, PhGs were able to inhibit the aggregation of Aβ42 and restrain Aβ42-induced cytotoxic effects on human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells by stimulating the expression of mRNA of glycolytic enzymes and intracellular ATP [42]. PhGs could increase the spatial learning memory of apolexis accelerated-prone mice by enhancing the mRNA expression of phosphoglycerate kinase [43]. Park’s trails showed a 17 kD N-terminal tau fragment generated by calpain cleavage, containing residues amino acid 45–230, which was arranged to mediate Aβ-induced toxicity [44]. The researches on tau immunotherapy suggest that tau immunization produces the activation of complement system that induces a bystander effect that leads to proteolysis of Aβ [45]. Those mean some relationship between Aβ and tau. However, little relative researches lied in discussion about the interactive effects of Aβ and tau or PhGs and tau protein. In our studies we speculated PhGs might affect the tau pathology in AD by influencing aggregation of Aβ, but the clear mechanism was unknown. The researches on anti-inflammatory capabilities in vitro reported that PhGs could inhibit IL-10 and TNF-α production in peritoneal macrophages. They also were proven to have dose-dependent effects on inhibitions of both gene and protein expressions of chemokines activated by interferon- (IFN-) g and TNF-α [46]. However, in our study we did not isolate PhGs from Cistanches Herba and focus on them. Further researches with different approaches such as cell biology, molecular biology, and plant chemistry would be needed to picture the actions of Cistanches Herba and its components.

Inflammation is a known factor in the etiopathogenesis of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) [47]. Early studies have proved that the native immune system and the complement system in brains of AD patients are activated. And the amyloid plaques are always surrounded by activated microglia, which can active nod-like receptors (NLRs) in the cytoplasm. These NLRs lead to the activation and concentration of cytosolic protein complexes as inflammasomes. These complexes can activate proinflammatory caspases, specifically caspase-1, which then makes the proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β activated [48]. The previous study reported that Cistanches Herba improved the immune system [49, 50]. Our studies demonstrated that the levels of TNF-α and IL-1β in CFS of drug treatment groups were significant lower than that in control group on 24 weeks and 48 weeks. We hypothesized that Cistanches Herba might be connected with the neuroinflammation pathway in AD brains.

5. Conclusions

Our study demonstrated Cistanches Herba could improve cognitive abilities in AD and slow down patient’s hippocampus atrophy, suppress the expressions of T-tau, TNF-α, and IL-1β in CSF of AD patients as the similar efficacy as Donepezil, but Cistanches Herba was much cheaper and easier to get, so it might be a kind of accessible substitute for Donepezil, especially in China or other developing countries.


CH:Cistanches Herba
PhGs:Phenylethanoid glycosides
TCM:Traditional Chinese medicine.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Jianping Wang and Nan Li conceived and designed the experiments. Nan Li, Zhiqiang Gu, Lie Yu, and Xiaojie Fu performed the experiments. Jun Ma and Chao Jiang analyzed the data. Jianping Wang contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. Nan Li wrote the paper. Nan Li and Jianping Wang contributed equally to this work.


This project was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (81271284). The authors wish to thank the paper assistance of Professor Jian Wang (Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University) and the technologic support staff at Institute of Neurology, Zhengzhou University.


  1. M. Prince, R. Bryce, E. Albanese, A. Wimo, W. Ribeiro, and C. P. Ferri, “The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis,” Alzheimer's & Dementia, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–75, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. N. Mattsson, H. Zetterberg, O. Hansson et al., “CSF biomarkers and incipient Alzheimer disease in patients with mild cognitive impairment,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 302, no. 4, pp. 385–393, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. G. Bartzokis, J. L. Cummings, D. Sultzer, V. W. Henderson, K. H. Nuechterlein, and J. Mintz, “White matter structural integrity in healthy aging adults and patients with Alzheimer disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study,” Archives of Neurology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 393–398, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. R. Jack Jr., M. Slomkowski, S. Gracon et al., “MRI as a biomarker of disease progression in a therapeutic trial of milameline for AD,” Neurology, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 253–260, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. F. Sardi, L. Fassina, L. Venturini et al., “Alzheimer's disease, autoimmunity and inflammation. The good, the bad and the ugly,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 149–153, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A. Aguzzi, B. A. Barres, and M. L. Bennett, “Microglia: scapegoat, saboteur, or something else?” Science, vol. 339, no. 6116, pp. 156–161, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. R. Emmerling, M. D. Watson, C. A. Raby, and K. Spiegel, “The role of complement in Alzheimer's disease pathology,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1502, no. 1, pp. 158–171, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. Trivedi, A. D. Olivas, and L. J. Noble-Haeusslein, “Inflammation and spinal cord injury: infiltrating leukocytes as determinants of injury and repair processes,” Clinical Neuroscience Research, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 283–292, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. G. M. Lewitus, H. Cohen, and M. Schwartz, “Reducing post-traumatic anxiety by immunization,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 1108–1114, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Shechter, A. London, C. Varol et al., “Infiltrating blood-derived macrophages are vital cells playing an anti-inflammatory role in recovery from spinal cord injury in mice,” PLoS Medicine, vol. 6, no. 7, Article ID e1000113, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. K. Baruch and M. Schwartz, “CNS-specific T cells shape brain function via the choroid plexus,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 34, pp. 11–16, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. W. Pan, C. Yu, H. Hsuchou, Y. Zhang, and A. J. Kastin, “Neuroinflammation facilitates LIF entry into brain: role of TNF,” The American Journal of Physiology—Cell Physiology, vol. 294, no. 6, pp. C1436–C1442, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. W. Threlkeld, J. L. Lynch, K. M. Lynch, G. B. Sadowska, W. A. Banks, and B. S. Stonestreet, “Ovine proinflammatory cytokines cross the murine blood-brain barrier by a common saturable transport mechanism,” NeuroImmunoModulation, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 405–410, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. J.-H. Hong, C.-S. Chiang, I. L. Campbell, J.-R. Sun, H. R. Withers, and W. H. McBride, “Induction of acute phase gene expression by brain irradiation,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 619–626, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C.-S. Chiang, J.-H. Hong, A. Stalder, J.-R. Sun, H. R. Withers, and W. H. McBride, “Delayed molecular responses to brain irradiation,” International Journal of Radiation Biology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 45–53, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. P. J. L. M. Strijbos and N. J. Rothwell, “Interleukin-1 beta attenuates excitatory amino acid-induced neurodegeneration in vitro: involvement of nerve growth factor,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 3468–3474, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  17. M. N. Woodroofe, G. S. Sarna, M. Wadhwa et al., “Detection of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in adult rat brain, following mechanical injury, by in vivo microdialysis: evidence of a role for microglia in cytokine production,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 227–236, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. V. Taupin, S. Toulmond, A. Serrano, J. Benavides, and F. Zavala, “Increase in IL-6, IL-1 and TNF levels in rat brain following traumatic lesion. Influence of pre- and post-traumatic treatment with Ro5 4864, a peripheral-type (p site) benzodiazepine ligand,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 177–185, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. G. Z. Feuerstein, T. Liu, and F. C. Barone, “Cytokines, inflammation, and brain injury: role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha,” Cerebrovascular and Bbrain Metabolism Reviews Journal, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 341–360, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  20. E. Shohami, Y. Shapira, A. Sidi, and S. Cotev, “Head injury induces increased prostaglandin synthesis in rat brain,” Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 58–63, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. R. Raghupathi, T. K. McIntosh, and D. H. Smith, “Cellular responses to experimental brain injury,” Brain Pathology, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 437–442, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. A. Aarli, “Role of cytokines in neurological disorders,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 1931–1937, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. Y. Jiang and P.-F. Tu, “Analysis of chemical constituents in Cistanche species,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 1216, no. 11, pp. 1970–1979, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. L.-W. Lin, M.-T. Hsieh, F.-H. Tsai, W.-H. Wang, and C.-R. Wu, “Anti-nociceptive and anti-inflammatory activity caused by Cistanche deserticola in rodents,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 177–182, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. X. M. Wu, X. M. Gao, K. W. K. Tsim, and P. F. Tu, “An arabinogalactan isolated from the stems of Cistanche deserticola induces the proliferation of cultured lymphocytes,” International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 278–282, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Jimenez and R. Riguera, “Phenylethanoid glycosides in plants: structure and biological activity,” Natural Product Reports, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 591–606, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. G.-Q. Sheng, J.-R. Zhang, X.-P. Pu, J. Ma, and C.-L. Li, “Protective effect of verbascoside on 1-methyl-4-phenylpyridinium ion-induced neurotoxicity in PC12 cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 451, no. 2, pp. 119–124, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Y. Lee, E. J. Jeong, H.-S. Lee, and Y. C. Kim, “Acteoside of Callicarpa dichotoma attenuates scopolamine-induced memory impairments,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 71–74, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Deng, J. Y. Zhao, P. F. Tu, Y. Jiang, Z. B. Li, and Y. H. Wang, “Echinacoside rescues the SHSY5Y neuronal cells from TNFalpha-induced apoptosis,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 505, no. 1–3, pp. 11–18, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. X. Geng, X. Tian, P. Tu, and X. Pu, “Neuroprotective effects of echinacoside in the mouse MPTP model of Parkinson's disease,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 564, no. 1–3, pp. 66–74, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. F. Folstein, S. E. Folstein, and P. R. McHugh, “‘Mini-mental state’. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician,” Journal of Psychiatric Research, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 189–198, 1975. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. W. G. Rosen, R. C. Mohs, and K. L. Davis, “A new rating scale for Alzheimer's disease,” The American Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 141, no. 11, pp. 1356–1364, 1984. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. J. Ashburner and K. Friston, “Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning—a unified framework,” NeuroImage, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 209–217, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. S.-K. Kim, J.-I. Yoo, B.-K. Cho et al., “Elevation of CRABP-I in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with Moyamoya disease,” Stroke, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 2835–2841, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Wang, P.-T. Li, H. Du et al., “Tong Luo Jiu Nao injection, a traditional Chinese medicinal preparation, inhibits MIP-1β expression in brain microvascular endothelial cells injured by oxygen-glucose deprivation,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 151–157, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. P. K. Leong, H. S. Wong, J. Chen, and K. M. Ko, “Yang/Qi invigoration: an herbal therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome with yang deficiency?” Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 2015, Article ID 945901, 8 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. M.-Y. Noh, S.-H. Koh, Y. Kim, H. Y. Kim, G. W. Cho, and S. H. Kim, “Neuroprotective effects of donepezil through inhibition of GSK-3 activity in amyloid-β-induced neuronal cell death,” Journal of Neurochemistry, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 1116–1125, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. B. Winblad, K. Engedal, H. Soininen et al., “A 1-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study of donepezil in patients with mild to moderate AD,” Neurology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 489–495, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. R. M. Lataro, C. A. Silva, C. Tefe-Silva, C. M. Prado, and H. C. Salgado, “Acetylcholinesterase inhibition attenuates the development of hypertension and inflammation in spontaneously hypertensive rats,” American Journal of Hypertension, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. R. C. Mohs, R. S. Doody, J. C. Morris et al., “A 1-year, placebo-controlled preservation of function survival study of donepezil in AD patients,” Neurology, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 481–488, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. T. C. Frank-Cannon, L. T. Alto, F. E. McAlpine, and M. G. Tansey, “Does neuroinflammation fan the flame in neurodegenerative diseases?” Molecular Neurodegeneration, vol. 4, article 47, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. Kurisu, Y. Miyamae, K. Murakami et al., “Inhibition of amyloid β aggregation by acteoside, a phenylethanoid glycoside,” Bioscience, Biotechnology and Biochemistry, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1329–1332, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. X. Geng, L. Song, X. Pu, and P. Tu, “Neuroprotective effects of phenylethanoid glycosides from Cistanches salsa against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP)-induced dopaminergic toxicity in C57 mice,” Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 797–801, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S.-Y. Park and A. Ferreira, “The generation of a 17 kDa neurotoxic fragment: an alternative mechanism by which tau mediates β-amyloid-induced neurodegeneration,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 22, pp. 5365–5375, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. C. Dai, X. Chen, S. F. Kazim et al., “Passive immunization targeting the N-terminal projection domain of tau decreases tau pathology and improves cognition in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer disease and tauopathies,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 122, no. 4, pp. 607–617, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. K. Saeed, Y. Deng, R. Dai, W. Li, Y. Yu, and Z. Iqbal, “Appraisal of antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory potential of extract and fractions from the leaves of Torreya grandis Fort Ex. Lindl,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 414–418, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. S. W. Pimplikar, “Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease: from pathogenesis to a therapeutic target,” Journal of Clinical Immunology, vol. 34, supplement 1, pp. S64–S69, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. W. P. Arend, G. Palmer, and C. Gabay, “IL-1, IL-18, and IL-33 families of cytokines,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 223, no. 1, pp. 20–38, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. S. Pastore, D. Lulli, P. Fidanza et al., “Plant polyphenols regulate chemokine expression and tissue repair in human keratinocytes through interaction with cytoplasmic and nuclear components of epidermal growth factor receptor system,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 314–328, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. G. Zong, W. He, G. Wu, M. Chen, X. Shen, and M. Shi, “Comparison between Cistanche deserticola Y. C. Ma and C, tubulosa (Shenk) Wight on some pharmacological actions,” Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 436–437, 1996. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Nan Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.