Review Article

The Efficacy of Acupuncture for the Treatment of Sciatica: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Data summary and characteristics of the 12 studies included in meta-analysis.

Study IDGroupAge (year)Duration (month)Sample size
(M/F)
OutcomeType of sciaticaDiagnostic criteriaWithdrawal/adverse effects

Zhan and Liang, 1993 [10]Acupuncture
CWM
NA
NA
NA
NA
420
420
EffectivenessNANANA/NA

Chen et al., 2007 [12]Acupuncture
CWM1
CWM2
34.24 ± 5.78
33.36 ± 7.58
35.78 ± 9.65
63 ± 43.08
69.36 ± 58.44
56.52 ± 47.52
30 (22/8)
30 (21/9)
30 (20/10)
Effectiveness pain thresholdNAThe clinical diagnostic and curative criteria of diseases (2nd) (1999)NA/NA

Dong et al., 2008 [15]Acupuncture
CWM
25–64
22–65
0.57–252
0.3–216
60 (32/28)
60 (34/26)
Pain intensity Primary sciatica3200 standard diagnoses of diseases in internal medicineNA/NA

Chen, 2010 [16]Electroacupuncture
CWM
41.72 ± 10.01
42.10 ± 9.87
25.29 ± 8.12
24.21 ± 7.98
30 (12/18)
30 (11/19)
Effectiveness pain intensity NACriteria of diagnosis of diseases and syndromes in traditional Chinese medicine (1994)
Practical diagnostics and therapeutics of integrated traditional Chinese and Western medicine (1995)
A/A

Zhu et al., 2011 [11]Electroacupuncture
CWM
18–75
19–76
1–60
1.5–66
40 (22/18)
40 (21/19)
EffectivenessTrunk-sciaticaPhysical examination, physical test (straight-leg-raising test), and
diagnostic imaging
NA/NA

Zhang, 2012 [17]Acupuncture
CWM
35 ± 4.50.3–48145 (89/56)EffectivenessSecondary sciaticaPhysical examination, physical test (the sciatic nerve traction syndrome), and
diagnostic imaging
NA/A

Zhai, 2012 [18]Acupuncture
CWM
22–71
22–70
0.33–12
0.1–12
28 (17/11)
28 (16/12)
EffectivenessNAPhysical examination, physical test (straight-leg-raising test), and
diagnostic imaging
NA/NA

Liu, 2012 [19]Acupuncture
CWM1
CWM2
29–3560–10880 (43/37)Pain thresholdNAThe clinical diagnostic and curative criteria of diseasesNA/A

Qiu, 2013 [5]Acupuncture
CWM
24–68
25–69.5
0.4–60
0.5–72
87 (52/35)
87 (54/33)
EffectivenessNAPhysical examination, physical test (the sciatic nerve traction syndrome), and
diagnostic imaging
NA/NA

Huang, 2014 [20]Acupuncture
CWM
36 ± 4.610–4876 (50/26)EffectivenessSecondary sciaticaPhysical examination, physical test (the sciatic nerve traction syndrome), and
diagnostic imaging
NA/NA

Wang, 2014 [21]Electroacupuncture
CWM
53.29 ± 3.1763.84 ± 18.8480 (43/37)Effectiveness pain thresholdNAThe clinical diagnostic and curative criteria of diseasesNA/NA

Ye et al., 2015 [22]Electroacupuncture
CWM
58.2 ± 9.1
55.5 ± 7.1
NA
NA
31 (12/19)
30 (11/19)
Pain intensityRoot sciaticaCriteria of diagnosis and therapeutic effect of diseases and syndromes in traditional Chinese medicine (1994)
Guiding principle of clinical research on new drugs of traditional Chinese medicine (trial) (2002)
NA/NA

A: available; M: male; F: female; NA: not available; CWM: conventional Western medicine; RCT: randomized controlled trial.
Age and duration were shown in mean ± standard deviation or minimum–maximum.