Review Article

Acupuncture for Low Back Pain: An Overview of Systematic Reviews

Table 3

Summary of positive results with meta-analysis, pain relief.

ComparatorAuthors (date)Number of RCTs (patients) pooledOutcome measured time pointEffect estimate (MD, SMD, WMD)
95% confidence interval

Sham acupunctureLam et al. (2013) [17]4 (287)Immediately(VAS) MD = −16.76 [95% CI, −33.33 to −0.19]
Manheimer et al. (2005) [28]4 (343)<6 weeksSMD = −0.58 [95% CI, −0.80 to −0.36]

Sham therapyFurlan et al. (2012) [20]10 (1727)ImmediatelyWMD = −0.59 [95% CI, −0.93 to −0.25] (VAS: 1–10)
Rubinstein et al. (2010) [22]4 (918)
4 (1076)
<1 month
<3 months
WMD = −5.88 [95% CI, −11.20 to −0.55]
WMD = −7.27 [95% CI, −12.66 to −1.89]
Furlan et al. (2005) [29]4 (314)
2 (138)
Immediately
<3 months
WMD = −10.21 [95% CI, −14.99 to −5.44]
WMD = −17.79 [95% CI, −25.50 to −10.07]

No treatmentLam et al. (2013) [17]4 (2911)ImmediatelySMD = −0.72 [95% CI, −0.94 to −0.49]
Xu et al. (2013) [19]5 (NR)>1 monthSMD = −0.64 [95% CI, −1.13 to −0.14]
Furlan et al. (2012) [20]3 (2684)<3 monthsWMD = −1.19 [95% CI, −2.17 to −0.21] (VAS: 1–10)
Rubinstein et al. (2010) [22]1 (214)<3 monthsWMD = −24.10 [95% CI, −31.52 to −16.68]
Manheimer et al. (2005) [28]8 (586)<6 weeksSMD = −0.69 [95% CI, −0.98 to −0.40]
Furlan et al. (2005) [29]2 (90)<3 monthsSMD = −0.73 [95% CI, −1.19 to −0.28]

Plus conventional therapyLam et al. (2013) [17]4 (269)Immediately(VAS) MD = −13.99 [95% CI, −20.48 to −7.50]
Rubinstein et al. (2010) [22]2 (99)
3 (185)
<1 month
<3 months
WMD = −9.80 [95% CI, −14.93 to −4.67]
WMD = −16.91 [95% CI, −25.18 to −8.64]
Furlan et al. (2005) [29]4 (289)
3 (182)
Immediately
<3 months
SMD = −0.76 [95% CI, −1.02 to −0.50]
SMD = −1.10 [95% CI, −1.62 to −0.58]

VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; MD: mean difference; WMD: weighted mean difference; SMD: standardized mean difference; CI: confidence interval; NR: not reported.