Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 347861, 7 pages
Research Article

Anti-Inflammatory Property of Plantago major Leaf Extract Reduces the Inflammatory Reaction in Experimental Acetaminophen-Induced Liver Injury

1Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Yaacob Latif, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, 56000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
2Department of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Jalan Raja Muda Abdul Aziz, 50300 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

Received 30 April 2015; Revised 16 July 2015; Accepted 21 July 2015

Academic Editor: Sonia Piacente

Copyright © 2015 Farida Hussan et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Hepatic injury induces inflammatory process and cell necrosis. Plantago major is traditionally used for various diseases. This study aimed to determine the anti-inflammatory property of P. major leaf extracts on inflammatory reaction following acetaminophen (APAP) hepatotoxicity. Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 5 groups, namely, normal control (C), APAP, aqueous (APAP + AQ), methanol (APAP + MT), and ethanol (APAP + ET) extract treated groups. All APAP groups received oral APAP (2 g/kg) at day 0. Then, 1000 mg/kg dose of P. major extracts was given for six days. The levels of liver transaminases were measured at day 1 and day 7 after APAP induction. At day 7, the blood and liver tissue were collected to determine plasma cytokines and tissue 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme. The in vitro anti-inflammatory activities of methanol, ethanol, and aqueous extracts were 26.74 ± 1.6%, 21.69 ± 2.81%, and 12.23 ± 3.15%, respectively. The ALT and AST levels were significantly higher in the APAP groups at day 1 whereas the enzyme levels of all groups showed no significant difference at day 7. The extracts treatment significantly reduced the proinflammatory cytokine levels and significantly increased the 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme activity (). In conclusion, the P. major extracts attenuate the inflammatory reaction following APAP-induced liver injury.

1. Introduction

Inflammation is a body homeostasis in response to any type of tissue injury. It is a complex phenomenon which involves innate and adaptive immune responses. It initiates leucocytes migration, compliment system stimulation, macrophages activation, and cytokines production from activated macrophages and neutrophils. Cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukins (IL) play important roles in recruitment of neutrophils and activation of macrophages to accelerate tissue repair process.

Drug-induced liver injury causes acute liver failure [1]. Acetaminophen (APAP) is one of the drugs which induce liver damage [2]. APAP-induced liver injury is due to its toxic metabolites N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI). Excessive production of NAPQI in APAP toxicity leads to glutathione (GSH) depletion, resulting in binding of the NAPQI to cellular protein which triggers cell injury [3]. The liver injury develops within three to five hours following exposure of APAP toxic dose and reaches the peak at 12 hours [4]. Cell injury elicits inflammatory reaction in the liver [5].

11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD type 1) enzyme is a native enzyme in liver and interconverts inactive glucocorticoids (cortisone) to active cortisol which has anti-inflammatory action [6]. Anti-inflammatory action of cortisol suppresses cellular immunity and potentiating of humoral immunity [7]. Therefore, the activity and expression of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme might involve in inflammatory reaction following hepatocytes injury.

Plantago major (P. major) of Plantaginaceae family is commonly known as broadleaf plantain [8] and it is popular in traditional medicine for wound healing as well as treating diseases related to skin, respiratory organs, digestive organs, reproduction, circulation, cancer, infection, and pain [9]. Besides the traditional applications, many researches have been done to prove its medicinal properties such as antiulcerogenic, anti-inflammatory, and immune-modulating activities and antioxidant, antiviral, and anticarcinogenic activities [10]. In Malaysia, P. major has been used as a diuretic, tonic, and cough mixture [11] and to treat urinary calculus [12] and diabetes [13]. P. major leaves possess numerous bioactive compounds such as flavonoids, terpenoids, pectin, iridoid glycosides, and tannins which express anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities [810]. The present study was aimed at determining the effect of P. major on the changes in plasma cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1, IL-6, and IL-10 following APAP-induced liver injury. Furthermore, the changes of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme in liver tissue would be determined and the role of this enzyme against inflammatory reaction in response to liver injury would be discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experimental Animals

Thirty male Sprague-Dawley rats (200–250 g) were obtained from the institutional animal resource unit. The rats were reared in stainless steel cages with a room temperature of °C with 12 hours light and dark cycle. All rats were allowed to access food and tap water ad libitum. All the animal handling procedures were in accordance with the ethical guideline with the approval number UKMAEC: FP/ANAT/2013/FARIDA/25-SEPT./533-OCT.-2013-SEPT.-2014.

2.2. Extract Preparation

The P. major plant is collected from Cameron Highland, Malaysia. The leaves were plucked and cleaned with tab water. Air-dried ground leaves powder of P. major (100 g for each solvent) was macerated in three different solvents such as 60% methanol, 60% ethanol, and deionized water, respectively. The solutions were kept for 3 days in a dark room at °C. The mixture was then filtered and the supernatant was collected. The process was repeated three times. The three batches of supernatant were mixed. The aqueous extract was freeze-dried whereas the methanol and ethanol extracts were concentrated in rotary evaporator at 50–60°C. Then, the concentrated fluid was later freeze-dried into powder. The extract powder was then sent to the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM) to evaluate anti-inflammatory activity with lipoxygenase assays.

2.3. Lipoxygenase Assay

This assay was done according to the method developed by Malik et al. [14] with slight modification. Soybean lipoxygenase ( type I-B and linoleic acid were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). In assay protocol, 160 μL of 100 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0), 10 μL of test-compound solution, and 20 μL of lipoxidase enzyme solution were mixed and incubated for 10 min at 25°C. The reaction was then initiated by the addition of 10 μL linoleic acid (substrate) solution, with the formation of (9Z, 11E)-(13S)-13-hydroperoxyoctadeca-9,11-dienoate and the change in absorbance was measured at 234 nm. Test compounds and the positive control were dissolved in DMSO. All the reactions were performed in triplicate in 96-well microplate in Tecan Infinite M200 Microplate Reader (Tecan, Austria). The IC50 values were then calculated using the GraphPad Prism Analysis.

2.4. Experimental Design

The rats were acclimatised for one week prior to administering any test agents and then divided into two groups. Normal control group (C, ) received oral 0.9% normal saline (NS) throughout the experiment whereas APAP group () which was subdivided into APAP, APAP + AQ, APAP + MT, and APAP + ET received oral APAP (2 g/kg). The subgroups received 0.9% NS and aqueous, methanol, and ethanol extracts, respectively, for 6 days. The extract dose (1000 mg/kg) was chosen based on our preliminary study. At day 1 which was 24 hours after the APAP induction, the blood was collected from the retroorbital space to determine the plasma liver enzyme. At day 7, the rats were anaesthetised and the blood was collected via cardiac puncture. Then, the rats were sacrificed and the liver was harvested.

2.5. Biochemical Analysis

The collected blood was put in EDTA tube and centrifuged at 1000 ×g in 4°C for 10 minutes. The plasma was collected and stored at −80°C until further analysis. Liver enzyme levels at days 1 and 7 were determined by semiautomatic method, using Bioanalyzer, semiautomatic BTS-350, BioSystems S.A., Spain. The plasma cytokine levels at day 7 were tested using ProcartaPlex cytokine assay kits (eBioscience, USA). Liver tissue was rinsed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and prepared for tissue homogenisation and immunostaining. The activity of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme was determined in liver tissue using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Uscn, USA).

2.6. Immunohistochemical Staining

The formalin fixed liver tissue was incubated in pH 6 citrate buffers at 95°C for 30 minutes and 0.3% hydrogen peroxidase for 10 minutes at room temperature. The primary antibody used was rMR64-82-2D6 and anti-rabbit IgG was used as a secondary antibody. The presence of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme was detected using the streptavidin-peroxidase system and 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB). Lastly, it was counterstained with Harris haematoxylin.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

The data was presented as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). The normally distributed data were analyzed using parametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The data that were not normally distributed were analyzed using nonparametric tests, Mann-Whitney test. The significant value was set as . All mentioned statistical analyses were conducted using Statistical Product and Service Solutions (SPSS) software, version 13.

3. Results

The lipoxygenase inhibition of the extracts was found to be 26.74 ± 1.6%, 21.69 ± 2.81%, and 12.23 ± 3.15% in the methanol, ethanol, and aqueous extracts, respectively. The results were presented as mean ± SEM (% inhibition). The standard, nonselective lipoxygenase inhibitor, nordihydroguaiaretic acid (NDGA), showed 99.86 ± 0.14% inhibition at the final concentration of 100 μg/mL. The methanol and ethanol extract showed higher antilipoxygenase activity than the aqueous extract.

3.1. Changes in Liver Enzymes

The liver enzymes such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) were significantly increased in APAP groups compared to the control group at day 1 which was 24 hours after the APAP (2 g/kg) induction. The liver enzyme levels in all the APAP groups at day 7 were significantly reduced compared to day 1 (). At day 7, there was no significant change of AST and ALT levels in all groups except the aqueous extract treated group which revealed significant lower ALT level than the APAP group of the same day (). The results were shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Effects of three different P. major leaf extracts on aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) enzymes at day 1 and day 7 after APAP induction.

3.2. Changes of Inflammatory Cytokines

The mean levels of IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α in all groups at day 7 were shown in Figure 1. The IL-1α level in the APAP group was significantly higher than that of the control group () (Figure 1(a)). However, there was no significant difference in IL-1β and TNF-α between the control and the APAP group (Figures 1(b) and 1(c)). The level of IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α in the APAP group was significantly higher compared to the treated groups () which indicated that P. major treatment significantly reduced the proinflammatory cytokines. The mean levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in all groups were shown in Figure 2. The levels of IL-6 and IL-10 in all groups showed no significant difference ().

Figure 1: Effects of three different P. major extracts on the level of proinflammatory cytokines in APAP-induced rats: (a) IL-1α, (b) IL-1β, and (c) TNF-α.  Significant difference from the APAP group ().
Figure 2: Effects of three different P. major extracts on the level of anti-inflammatory cytokines in APAP-induced rats: (a) IL-6 and (b) IL-10 (no significant difference ).
3.3. Changes of 11β-HSD Type 1 Enzyme Activity

The activity of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme in all groups was shown in Figure 3. The enzyme activity between the control and APAP groups showed no significant difference whereas the activity was significantly reduced in APAP group compared to the APAP + MT and APAP + ET groups (). Therefore, the methanol and ethanol extract were able to enhance the enzyme activity following APAP-induced liver injury.

Figure 3: Effects of three different P. major extracts on the activity of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme in APAP-induced liver tissue;  significant difference from the APAP group ().
3.4. 11β-HSD Type 1 Enzyme Expression

Figure 4 showed the expression of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme in liver tissue. The immunohistochemical staining of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme was used to determine the expression of enzyme. There was no expression of 11β-HSD type 1 in the APAP group (Figure 4(b)). However, the greater intensity of expression was found around the central vein area in both APAP + MT and APAP + ET groups (Figures 4(d) and 4(e)).

Figure 4: 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme expression in liver tissue (×10; immunohistochemical stain): (a) control; (b) APAP; (c) APAP + AQ; (d) APAP + MT; and (e) APAP + ET.

4. Discussion

This study was aimed at determining the effect of P. major extract treatment on inflammatory reaction following APAP toxicity. The APAP dose in the present study was proven to produce liver toxicity in rats which showed increased liver enzyme levels and liver necrosis [15]. The treatment dose of 1000 mg/kg of P. major extract was based on our preliminary results. The use of high dose (2000 mg/kg) of P. major showed no toxic effect [16]. The minimum effective dose of this plant is 600 mg/kg [13].

The in vivo anti-inflammatory activity of P. major has been well described [17]. The anti-inflammatory activity of the extracts was determined using lipoxygenase assay. Lipoxygenase enzyme catalyses arachidonic acid to produce leukotrienes. Leukotrienes play role in inflammatory diseases. The plant extracts or the phytochemicals which possess inhibitory effect on this enzyme have the potential to be used in inflammatory condition [18]. In the present study, the highest anti-inflammatory activity was found in the methanol extract followed by the ethanol extract. The result was similar to the finding of Beara et al. [19]. It is stated that its anti-inflammatory activity is contributed by flavonoids such as baicalein and hispidulin and iridoid glycosides such as aucubin [9].

Inflammation is a body response to remove tissue debris and to initiate tissue regeneration following injury. Persistence inflammatory reaction exaggerates tissue damage, resulting in improper tissue repair process. Inflammatory reaction is initiated by the release of proinflammatory cytokines such as IL-1, IL-6, and TNF-α [20]. The proinflammatory cytokine in the circulation is a signal to recruit neutrophils and leucocytes which subsequently remove the cellular debris to promote tissue regeneration [21]. IL-6 also acts as an anti-inflammatory cytokine by inhibiting the secretion of TNF-α and IL-1 [22]. Extensive tissue damage can be prevented by the action of anti-inflammatory cytokines including IL-10 or suppression of proinflammatory cytokines.

In this present study, the proinflammatory cytokine (IL-1α, IL-1β, and TNF-α) levels were significantly high in the APAP group compared to the treated groups. The IL-1 and TNF-α which are released by activated macrophages stimulate leukocyte adhesion to endothelial surfaces prior to migration into tissues. IL-1 often expresses synergistic action with TNF-α to initiate cell death [23]. The TNF-α and IL-1 levels in the plasma reflect the severity of inflammation [24].

The inhibition of TNF-α and IL-1 exhibits partial prevention of APAP toxicity, including reduction of liver enzyme in circulation [25]. The results of the present study showed the lower level of TNF-α and IL-1 in the P. major treated groups. The effect was more pronounced in the methanol extract treated group which was in line with the in vitro anti-inflammatory activities of P. major. It indicated that the anti-inflammatory property of the P. major was able to prevent the inflammatory reaction following APAP toxicity. It has been documented that the natural products with anti-inflammatory properties decreased the levels of proinflammatory cytokines [26].

11β-HSD type 1 is present in liver and its role is to interconvert inactive glucocorticoid to the active form [27, 28]. Cortisol in human or corticosterone in rodent is an active form of glucocorticoid which has anti-inflammatory properties. Glucocorticoids express its anti- inflammatory action by suppressing the nuclear transcription factors AP-1 and NF-κB which induce genes expression of all proinflammatory cytokines [29]. In the present study, the P. major extract treated groups showed increased activity and expression of 11β-HSD type 1 enzyme especially in the methanol and ethanol extract treated groups. Therefore, attenuation of inflammatory reaction might be related to the local tissue production of active glucocorticoid. Furthermore, Dinarello [29] stated that glucocorticoid increases the transcription of anti-inflammatory proteins such as IL-10 and the IL-1 type 2-decoy receptor. However, in the present study, the anti-inflammatory cytokine (such as IL-6 and IL-10) levels were not changed significantly among all groups. Based on our results, the glucocorticoid action activated by 11β-HSD type 1 has potential role in suppression of proinflammatory molecules, rather than promoting anti-inflammatory cytokines.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, the leaf extracts of P. major have the potential in attenuation of the inflammatory response by reducing the levels of proinflammatory cytokines. The potential mechanism of reduction in inflammatory reaction by the P. major extracts could be due to production of local tissue glucocorticoid. Therefore, methanol and ethanol extracts of P. major have potential to be used as an alternative or adjunct treatment to reduce inflammation-mediated cell injury following APAP toxicity.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


The authors would like to express their gratitude to Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia for providing the research funding (Grant no. DLP-2013-021) and the UKM Research Ethics Committee, Forest Research Institute Malaysia (FRIM), and the staff of the Anatomy Department, Faculty of Medicine, UKM.


  1. N. Metha and M. R. Pinsky, “Drug-induced hepatotoxicity,” Medscape Reference: Drugs, Disease & Procedures, 2014,
  2. R. Kaushal, K. R. Dave, and S. S. Katyare, “Paracetamol hepatotoxicity and microsomal function,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 67–74, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. H. Jaeschke, M. R. McGill, C. D. Williams, and A. Ramachandran, “Current issues with acetaminophen hepatotoxicity—a clinically relevant model to test the efficacy of natural products,” Life Sciences, vol. 88, no. 17-18, pp. 737–745, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Jaeschke, C. D. Williams, M. R. McGill, Y. Xie, and A. Ramachandran, “Models of drug-induced liver injury for evaluation of phytotherapeutics and other natural products,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 55, pp. 279–289, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. D. L. Laskin, “Macrophages and inflammatory mediators in chemical toxicity: a battle of forces,” Chemical Research in Toxicology, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1376–1385, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. J. W. Tomlinson, E. A. Walker, I. J. Bujalska et al., “11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1: a tissue-specific regulator of glucocorticoid response,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 831–866, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. I. J. Elenkov and G. P. Chrousos, “Stress hormones, Th1/Th2 patterns, pro/anti-inflammatory cytokines and susceptibility to disease,” Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 359–368, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. Nazaizadeh, P. Mikaili, M. Moloudizargari, S. Aghajanshakeri, and S. Javaherypour, “Therapeutic uses and pharmacological properties of Plantago major L. and its active constituents,” Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 212–221, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. B. Samuelsen, “The traditional uses, chemical constituents and biological activities of Plantago major,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 71, no. 1-2, pp. 1–21, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Zubair, H. Nybom, C. Lindholm, and K. Rumpunen, “Major polyphenols in aerial organs of greater plantain (Plantago major L.), and effects of drying temperature on polyphenol contents in the leaves,” Scientia Horticulturae, vol. 128, no. 4, pp. 523–529, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. H. Noor, M. Juing, B. J. Chee, B. L. Kueh, and Z. Othman, “Medicinal properties of Plantago major: hypoglycaemic and male fertility studies,” Pertanika Journal of Tropical Agricultural Science, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 29–35, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. A. Aziz, T. L. See, L. Y. Khuay, K. Osman, and M. A. A. Bakar, “In vitro effects of Plantago major on urolithiasis,” Malaysian Journal of Medical Sciences, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 22–26, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  13. C. B. Jin and H. M. Noor, “The hypoglycaemic effect of Plantago major leaf extract on alloxan-induced diabetic rats,” Journal of Tropical Medicinal Plants, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 175–178, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. A. Malik, I. Anis, S. B. Khan et al., “Enzymes inhibiting lignans from Vitex negundo,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 1269–1272, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. U. Yanpallewar, S. Sen, S. Tapas, M. Kumar, S. S. Raju, and S. B. Acharya, “Effect of Azadirachta indica on paracetamol-induced hepatic damage in albino rats,” Phytomedicine, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 391–396, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. A. H. Atta and K. A. El-Sooud, “The antinociceptive effect of some Egyptian medicinal plant extracts,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 95, no. 2-3, pp. 235–238, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. I. Türel, H. Özbek, R. Erten, A. C. Öner, N. Cengiz, and O. Yilmaz, “Hepatoprotective and anti-inflammatory activities of Plantago major L,” Indian Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 120–124, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Govindappa, T. S. Sadananda, R. Channabasava, and V. B. Raghavendra, “In vitro anti-inflammatory, lipoxygenase, xanthine oxidase and acetycholinesterase inhibitory activity of Tecoma stans (L.) Juss. Ex kunth,” International Journal of Pharma and Bio Sciences, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 275–285, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. I. N. Beara, D. Z. Orčić, M. M. Lesjak, N. M. Mimica-Dukić, B. A. Peković, and M. R. Popović, “Liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry study of anti-inflammatory activity of Plantain (Plantago L.) species,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 701–706, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. E. Blazka, J. L. Wilmer, S. D. Holladay, R. E. Wilson, and M. I. Luster, “Role of proinflammatory cytokines in acetaminophen hepatotoxicity,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. L. P. James, L. W. Lamps, S. McCullough, and J. A. Hinson, “Interleukin 6 and hepatocyte regeneration in acetaminophen toxicity in the mouse,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 309, no. 4, pp. 857–863, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. P. Chrousos, F. Epstein, J. Flier, S. Reichlin, and S. Pavlou, “The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis and immune-mediated inflammation,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 332, no. 20, pp. 1351–1362, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. B. D. Cosgrove, B. M. King, M. A. Hasan et al., “Synergistic drug-cytokine induction of hepatocellular death as an in vitro approach for the study of inflammation-associated idiosyncratic drug hepatotoxicity,” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 237, no. 3, pp. 317–330, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Banerjee and M. Saxena, “Interleukin-1 (IL-1) family of cytokines: role in type 2 diabetes,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 413, no. 15-16, pp. 1163–1170, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. E. Blazka, M. R. Elwell, S. D. Holladay, R. E. Wilson, and M. I. Luster, “Histopathology of acetaminophen-induced liver changes: role of interleukin 1α and tumor necrosis factor α,” Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 181–189, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Xiao, E. C. Liong, Y. P. Ching et al., “Lycium barbarum polysaccharides protect mice liver from carbon tetrachloride-induced oxidative stress and necroinflammation,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 139, no. 2, pp. 462–470, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. K. E. Chapman, A. E. Coutinho, Z. Zhang, T. Kipari, J. S. Savill, and J. R. Seckl, “Changing glucocorticoid action: 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in acute and chronic inflammation,” Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 137, pp. 82–92, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. W. Voice, J. R. Seckl, C. R. W. Edwards, and K. E. Chapman, “1β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 expression in 2S FAZA hepatoma cells is hormonally regulated: a model system for study of hepatic glucocorticoid metabolism,” Biochemical Journal, vol. 317, pp. 621–625, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  29. C. A. Dinarello, “Anti-inflammatory agents: present and future,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 935–950, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus