An Overview of Meta-Analyses of Danhong Injection for Unstable Angina
Table 2
Methodological quality assessment of systems review/meta-analysis [24, 25].
AMSTAR
Yes
No
Cannot answer
Not applicable
Items
%
%
%
%
1
0
0
5
100
0
0
0
0
2
3
60
0
0
2
40
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
5
100
0
0
4
0
0
5
100
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
5
100
0
0
0
0
6
3
60
2
40
0
0
0
0
7
4
80
1
20
0
0
0
0
8
0
0
5
100
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
5
100
0
0
0
0
10
3
60
2
40
0
0
0
0
11
1
20
4
80
0
0
0
0
(1) Was an “a priori” design provided? (2) Were there duplicate study selection and data extraction? (3) Was a comprehensive literature search performed? (4) Was the status of publication (i.e., grey literature) used as an inclusion criterion? (5) Was a list of studies (included and excluded) provided? (6) Were the characteristics of the included studies provided? (7) Was the scientific quality of the included studies assessed and documented? (8) Was the scientific quality of the included studies used appropriately in formulating conclusions? (9) Were the methods used to combine the findings of studies appropriate? (10) Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? (11) Was the conflict of interest stated?
