Research Article

Expectancy of Stress-Reducing Aromatherapy Effect and Performance on a Stress-Sensitive Cognitive Task

Table 3

(a) Comparison of behavioral performances on the go/no-go task by aroma group. (b) Comparison of behavioral performances on the go/no-go task by prime subgroup.
(a)

MeasuresLavenderCoconutWater
BaselinePoststressBaselinePoststressBaselinePoststress

Go (% correct)99.5 (0.9)99.6 (0.8)99.4 (0.8)99.3 (1.3)99.3 (1.4)99.5 (1.2)
No-go (% correct)84.5 (12.9)87.5 (11.6)78.4 (15.5)81.5 (16.0)83.7 (13.5)85.9 (14.4)
Median RT, mean (SD)366.3 (60.9)346.9 (44.6)354.3 (62.2)334.7 (49.0)355.2 (67.5)342.1 (56.7)

SD = standard deviation.
Dependent variables: go = performance on go trials, no-go = performance on no-go trials, and median RT = median reaction time.
(b)

MeasuresPrimeNo-prime
BaselinePoststressBaselinePoststress

Go (% correct)99.2 (1.3)99.3 (1.3)99.6 (0.6)99.6 (0.9)
No-go (% correct)81.9 (13.5)84.3 (14.4)82.6 (14.8)85.8 (14.0)
Median RT, mean (SD)a,b356.6 (59.6)333.2 (48.2)360.5 (66.9)349.48 (51.0)

SD = standard deviation.
Dependent variables: go = performance on go trials, no-go = performance on no-go trials, and median RT = median reaction time.
aPrime × time interaction, = .037; bsignificant change in prime subgroup, .