Research Article
Expectancy of Stress-Reducing Aromatherapy Effect and Performance on a Stress-Sensitive Cognitive Task
Table 4
Relationships among expectancy, poststress behavioral, and poststress ERP measures.
| Variable | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| (1) GNG med. RT | 0.176 | −0.054 | 0.051 | −0.221 | 0.040 | −0.082 | −0.346T | (2) GNG no-go % errors | 1 | −0.166 | −0.309 | −0.132 | −0.278 | 0.304 | 0.151 | (3) N200 no-go amplitude | | 1 | 0.138 | 0.547** | 0.124 | −0.171 | −0.165 | (4) N200 no-go latency | | | 1 | −0.192 | 0.995** | −0.288 | −0.110 | (5) P300 no-go amplitude | | | | 1 | −0.189 | −0.441* | −0.147 | (6) P300 no-go latency | | | | | 1 | −0.291 | −0.106 | (7) Expected aroma effect (baseline) | | | | | | 1 | 0.443* | (8) Alertness level (poststress) | | | | | | | 1 |
|
|
Abbreviations: GNG = go/no-go task, med. RT = median reaction time, SD = standard deviation, and ERP = event related potential.
T.10 < < .05, , and .
|