Biothermodynamic Assay of Coptis-Evodia Herb Couples
Table 2
Changes in related biochemical parameters in the liver of the mice with gastric “cold” or “hot” symptom after being treated with coptis-evodia herb couples (, ).
Group
Na+-K+-ATPase (μmol⋅mg−1⋅h−1)
Mg2+-ATPase (μmol⋅mg−1⋅h−1)
Ca2+-ATPase (μmol⋅mg−1⋅h−1)
T-AOC (U/mgprot)
SOD (U/mgprot)
Control
4.38 ± 0.72
3.96 ± 0.48
3.72 ± 0.63
0.2381 ± 0.539
87.36 ± 12.11
CM
2.58 ± 0.44
1.97 ± 0.23
2.57 ± 0.25
0.1515 ± 0.0357
68.37 ± 8.39
CM + ZJW
2.43 ± 0.38
1.87 ± 0.36
2.45 ± 0.49
0.1244 ± 0.0721
64.81 ± 15.00
CM + GLS
3.13 ± 0.53
2.04 ± 0.25
2.29 ± 0.38
0.1493 ± 0.0435
72.02 ± 11.13
CM + ZYW
3.04 ± 0.22
3.00 ± 0.34
2.88 ± 0.42
0.2982 ± 0.0386
98.24 ± 9.37
CM + FZJ
4.73 ± 0.51
4.35 ± 0.85
3.56 ± 0.38
0.2523 ± 0.0265
85.62 ± 11.08
Control
4.96 ± 0.64
3.84 ± 0.51
3.94 ± 0.67
0.2377 ± 0.254
94.75 ± 10.48
HM
5.63 ± 0.77
5.36 ± 0.66
4.97 ± 0.46
0.4168 ± 0.1152
148.71 ± 13.20
HM + ZJW
4.72 ± 0.70
3.38 ± 0.50
3.90 ± 0.54
0.2428 ± 0.1198
99.36 ± 10.51
HM + GLS
4.38 ± 0.62
4.33 ± 0.39
4.61 ± 0.38
0.2404 ± 0.0368
89.28 ± 9.34
HM + ZYW
5.74 ± 0.82
4.23 ± 0.78
4.53 ± 0.17
0.5644 ± 0.0269
122.58 ± 10.98
HM + FZJ
5.18 ± 0.56
4.64 ± 0.82
5.09 ± 0.72
0.5676 ± 0.0596
151.81 ± 17.72
CM: cold model; HM: hot model; ZJW: Zuojin wan; GLS: Ganlu san; ZYW: Zhuyu wan; FZJ: Fanzuojin wan. P < 0.05, P < 0.01 versus control, P < 0.05, and P < 0.01 versus CM or HM (ANOVA).
