Review Article

External Application of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Venous Ulcers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Included RCTs.

Study LocationSample size
E/C
Age
E/C
Duration E/C
(months)
Duration of treatment
(weeks)
Main outcomesEvaluation methodOutcome odds 95% CI;
final pain measurement (95%)
ADs of experimental groupFUP
(months)

Cao et al., 2005 [20]China30/3063.2/62.512.5/12.04TER, CR, IRVerification of the area4.50 1.09–18.50NRNR

Di 2009 [14]China32/3257.75/56.5944.64/44.164TER, CR, IRVerification of the area8.68 1.00–75.30Two patients: contact dermatitis1

Fang et al., 2012 [26]China69/6359.5/60.5NR4TER, CR, IRVerification of the area15.71 0.87–284.88NRNR

Feng, 2009 [9]China82/82NRNR8TER, CR, IRVerification of the area12.06 2.71–53.74NRNR

Huang et al., 2009 [19]China30/3062NR4TER, CR, IRVerification of the area;
subjective evaluation of a researcher
5.80 0.63–53.01NR24

Jia and Li, 2011 [10]China32/3055.7/56.617.8/17.94TER, CR, IRVerification of the area6.43 1.26–32.83NRNR

Jia, 2012 [15]China28/2853.2NR3TER, CR, IRVerification of the area;
subjective evaluation of a researcher
10.47 0.54–204.32NoneNR

Li and Zhang, 2013 [11]China40/3848.6/46.210.8/13.24TER, CR, IRVerification of the area3.34 0.33–33.63Three patients: ecchymosis6

Peng, 2014 [16]China30/3065.9/66.481.6/82.444TER, CR, IR, VRTVerification of the area;
subjective evaluation of a researcher; PPG
3.25 0.89–11.90NoneNR

Wang, 2013 [17]China30/3063.23/63126/1204TER, CR, IR, VRT, VPVerification of the area;
subjective evaluation of a researcher; PPG
4.50 1.09–18.50NoneNR

Xu, 2009 [21]China48/4258/57.89.5/8.42TER, CR, IRVerification of the area2.03 0.45–9.05NRNR

Xu, 2012 [22]China30/3052.5NR4TER, CR, IR, painVerification of the area1.00 0.23–4.43; E 0.62 (1.13); C 2.13 (1.45)NRNR

Zhang et al., 2007 [23]China60/4566.7/65.911.3/14.94TER, CR, IRVerification of the area; subjective evaluation of a researcher; photography10.55 2.22–50.02NRNR

Zhang et al., 2008 [24]China30/30NRNR4TER, CR, IRVerification of the area;
subjective evaluation of a researcher
5.35 0.25–116.31NRNR

Zhang et al., 2008 [18]China62/4554.4/52.8NR6TER, CR, IRVerification of the area;
subjective evaluation of a researcher
2.85 0.88–9.18Two patients: contact dermatitisNR

Zhang, 2013 [25]China27/2459.78/60.056.44/7.244TER, CR, IR, painVerification of the area;
subjective evaluation of a researcher
10.71 1.21–94.96;
E 1.76 (0.52); C 1.84 (0.49)
NRNR

RCTs, randomized controlled trials; E, experimental group; C, control group; ADs, adverse events; FUP, follow-up period; NR, no report; TER, total effective rate; CR, curative ratio; IR, inefficiency rate; VRT, venous refill time; PPG, photoplethysmography; VP, venous pressure.