Review Article
Chinese Herbal Bath Therapy for the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Table 1
Characteristics of randomized controlled trials of Chinese herbal bath therapy for knee OA.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ACR: American College of Rheumatology; yr: year; ND: no data; VAS pain: 0–10; lower score: better outcome. Diagnostic criteria: (i) Chinese orthopaedic association diagnostic criteria [26]. Main points: () recurrent knee joint pain in the last month; () narrowed joint space, subchondral cyst formation and bone sclerosis, or osteophytosis around joint margin on the radiographs in standing or load position; () evidence of clear, transparent, and viscous joint effusion at least twice; white cell count <2000/mL; () middle-aged and aged patients (40 years old or older); () morning stiffness ≤ 30 min; () palpable bone crepitation (fremitus) on movement of joint. Diagnosis of knee osteoarthritis can be made if the following conditions are satisfied: () + (), () + () + () + () or () + () + () + (). (ii) Traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic criteria [27]. Main points: () recurrent knee pain recently; () common occurred in the middle-aged and elder people; () bone crepitus is observed when the joint is moved, or joint deformity; () joint space becoming narrow and osteophyte formation in joint edge on the X-ray; () excluded rheumatoid arthritis. Outcome definition and measurement: (i) The traditional Chinese medicine assessment comprises three levels: “cured” (pain and swelling of joint disappeared and active function returned to normal); “improved” (pain and swelling of joint alleviated and active function returned improved); and “not cured,” (pain and swelling of joint remained unchanged). Total effectiveness rate (%) is determined as the quotient of number of cured and improved patients divided by the total number of the patients. (ii) The Japanese orthopedic association assessment is assessed by four facets: pain when walking on flat ground, pain when walking on stairs, angle of flexion, and amount of swelling. All facets are scored from a scale from 0 to 100: “significant improvement” is a difference greater than 6 between the score of after treatment and prior to treatment, “some improvement” is a difference between 3 and 6, and “not effective” is a difference less than 3. Total effectiveness rate (%) is determined as the quotient of number of significant and some improvement patients divided by the total number of the patients. (iii) Lysholm’s score ranges from 0 to 100: a score of 100 indicates no symptoms, 80 or greater is “excellent”, 70 to 79 is “good,” 60 to 69 is “medium,” and less than 60 is “poor.” Total effectiveness rate (%) is determined as the quotient of number of excellent, good, and medium patients divided by the total number of the patients. Lysholm’s score: 0–100, higher score = better outcome. |