Research Article

Antioxidant and Wound Healing Activity of Polyherbal Fractions of Clinacanthus nutans and Elephantopus scaber

Table 4

Mean area of wound (mm2) and % wound contraction during burn wound model.

DaysDay 0 (before treatment)36912151719

Group 1 (ethyl acetate)499 ± 3.53 (0.00)291.75 ± 3.44 (41.53)264.5 ± 4.66 (46.99)256.5 ± 2.84 (48.59)60.5 ± 3.79 (87.87)25.5 ± 2.53 (94.88)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)
Group 2 (n-butanol)476.75 ± 9.25 (0.00)371.75 ± 6.57 (22.02)265 ± 5.49 (44.41)200.75 ± 8.17 (57.89)138.75 ± 7.4 (70.89)59.75 ± 3.14 (87.46)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)
Group 3 (aqueous)489.75 ± 1.84 (0.00)311.25 ± 1.10 (36.44)177.25 ± 2.75 (63.80)81.5 ± 1.55 (83.35)48.5 ± 1.55 (90.09)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)
Group 4 (standard)492 ± 4.02 (0.00)318.5 ± 5.51 (35.26)317.5 ± 3.37 (35.46)255.5 ± 4.34 (48.06)114.5 ± 3.77 (76.72)28.25 ± 2.65 (94.25)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)0.00 ± 0.00 (0.00)
Group 5 (control)496.5 ± 5.60 (0.00)424.25 ± 8.40 (14.55)324 ± 7.42 (34.74)323.5 ± 7.5 (34.84)207.25 ± 5.92 (58.25)119.5 ± 6.13 (75.93)56.5 ± 5.75 (88.62)26.75 ± 5.50 (94.61)

Values are mean ± SEM (percent) of 4 rats in each group. , , and compared to respective day control group (statistical analysis was done by one-way analysis of variance followed by Dunnett’s test for multiple comparisons).