Research Article

Acupoints Stimulation for Anxiety and Depression in Cancer Patients: A Quantitative Synthesis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Table 3

Summary of meta-analyses.

Study outcomesNumber of trialsNumber of participantsStatistical methodEffect estimateTest for overall effectHeterogeneity ()

Overall assessment of acupoints stimulation: acupoints stimulation versus different comparisons (for anxiety)
Acupoints stimulation versus standard methods of treatment/care3567NRNRNRNRNA
Acupoints stimulation versus sham acupoints stimulation2137Mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI)−0.65 [−2.84, 1.53]0.590.56>50%

Overall assessment of acupoints stimulation: acupoints stimulation versus different comparisons (for depression)
Acupoints stimulation versus standard methods of treatment/care5485Mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI)−1.08 [−1.97, −0.19]2.390.02>50%
Acupoints stimulation versus sham acupoints stimulation2137Mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI)−0.27 [−2.66, 2.12]0.230.8250%

Subgroup analysis: different types of acupoints stimulation versus standard methods of treatment/care (for anxiety)
Electroacupuncture2112NRNRNRNRNA
Acupuncture2302NRNRNRNRNA

Subgroup analysis: different types of acupoints stimulation versus standard methods of treatment/care (for depression)
Electroacupuncture2159NRNRNRNRNA
Acupuncture4393Mean difference (IV, random, 95% CI)−2.55 [−3.61, −1.49]4.72<0.00001>50%

Subgroup analysis: different types of acupoints stimulation versus sham comparison (for anxiety)
Acupuncture2152NRNRNRNRNA
Acupressure157NRNRNRNRNA

Subgroup analysis: different types of acupoints stimulation versus sham comparison (for depression)
Acupuncture2152NRNRNRNRNA
Acupressure157NRNRNRNRNA

IV: inverse variance, CI: confidence interval, NR: not reported because pooling was not conducted due to the insufficient number of studies, different models of data, or absence of data, NA: not applicable
Sample was adopted from one study (as the sample of the other study was based on the study we adopted).