The Long-Term Course of Outcomes for Lumbar Intervertebral Disc Herniation following Integrated Complementary and Alternative Medicine Inpatient Treatment: A Prospective Observational Study
Table 1
Baseline demographic characteristics.
Variables
Long-term follow-up group ()
Non-long-term follow-up group ()
%
Mean (SD)
%
Mean (SD)
Age (years)
Gender
Male
199
54.22
67
42.68
Female
168
45.78
90
57.32
Smoking status
No
247
67.30
86
54.78
Quit
63
17.17
26
16.56
Yes
57
15.53
45
28.66
Drinking
Yes
301
82.02
139
88.54
No
66
17.98
18
11.46
Body Mass Index (kg/m2)
Previous back pain
None
243
66.21
101
64.33
Disc herniation
109
29.70
46
29.30
Other (e.g., fracture)
15
4.09
10
6.37
Comorbid illnessesa
Yes
61
16.62
16
10.19
No
306
83.38
141
89.81
Radiating pain
None
79
21.53
24
15.29
Unilateral
226
61.58
99
63.06
Bilateral
62
16.89
34
21.66
Radiating pain to below the knee
None
136
37.06
60
38.22
Unilateral
225
61.31
95
60.51
Bilateral
6
1.63
2
1.27
Muscular weakness
47
12.81
21
13.38
Sensory loss
42
11.44
15
9.55
Straight leg raising test < 60°
112
30.52
63
40.13
Range of lumbar flexion < 60°
138
37.60
62
39.49
Previous back surgery
34
9.26
15
9.55
Previous treatment (for current pain episode)
Nerve blocks
107
29.16
42
26.75
Pain killers
108
29.43
35
22.29
CAM
70
19.07
28
17.83
Duration of current episode (days)
Less than 1 month
144
39.24
61
38.85
Between 1 and 6 months
117
31.88
45
28.66
Other
106
28.88
51
32.48
Low back pain, NRS (0–10)
Radiating leg pain, NRS (0–10)
Oswestry disability index (0–100)
NRS, numerical rating scale; CAM, complementary and alternative medicine; aany self-reported gastritis, tuberculosis poliomyelitis, cardiovascular diseases, uterine myoma, or hepatitis B carrier.