Anxiolytic Effect of Citrus aurantium L. in Crack Users

Table 3

Presentation of the mean and standard error (Ep) of the HAS factors (anxiety, cognitive impairment, and discomfort) in the different phases of the Simulated Public Speaking (SPS).

Groups	Phases of application of the SPS, mean (Ep)
	Basal	Stressor	During	Final
Anxiety
Control	33 (4,921)	50 (5,615)	44 (6,058)	26 (4,28)
OE Nonuser	26 (4,213)	23 (3,369)	27 (4,834)	23 (4,389)
OE User	29 (3,829)	35 (3,52)	34 (3,014)	25 (3,409)
value	0,5603	0,0002	0,0530	0,8730
Cognitive impairment
Control	37 (2,123)	46 (5,314)	41 (5,152)	35 (4,147)
OE Nonuser	30 (3,928)	25 (2,873)	22 (3,293)	23 (3,71)
OE User	30 (3,212)	30 (3,66)	29 (3,709)	30 (3,579)
value	0,1893	0,0018	0,0075	0,0937
Discomfort
Control	25 (2,925)	35 (3,665)	35 (3,755)	25 (3,254)
OE Nonuser	21 (2,296)	21 (2,425)	22 (2,558)	20 (2,244)
OE User	31 (4,767)	28 (4,571)	29 (4,574)	27 (4,937)
value	0,1746	0,0344	0,0361	0,3051
Sedation
Control	35 (3,306)	26 (3,056)	29 (3,393)	26 (3,851)
OE Nonuser	32 (3,661)	30 (4,811)	25 (4,076)	25 (3,946)
OE User	34 (4,837)	37 (5,715)	37 (5,094)	34 (5,521)
value	0,4426	0,3428	0,1201	0,3066

Source: Direct Research 2015. Statistical Test: ANOVA and Bonferroni posttest. Significantly different from the “Control Group” at the time Stressor. Significantly different from the “Control Group” at the time. is equivalent to number 1. # is equivalent to number 2.