Research Article

Maintaining Treatment Fidelity of Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention Intervention for Alcohol Dependence: A Randomized Controlled Trial Experience

Table 4

Treatment experience and satisfaction among the intervention group participants during the study.

MeasureOverallCohort 1Cohort 2Cohort 3Cohort 4Cohort 5Cohort 6Cohort 7Cohort 8

Treatment Satisfaction Survey (completed at the last intervention session; N = 46)

Importance of the meditation course8.2 ± 1.37.4 ± 2.07.8 ± 0.88.0 ± 1.09.2 ± 1.08.7 ± 0.88.5 ± 1.98.0±1.67.5 ± 0.6
Usefulness of the course in helping maintain sobriety7.5 ± 2.07.4 ± 2.18.0 ± 1.67.1 ± 2.18.0 ± 1.87.7 ± 1.26.3 ± 3.37.7 ± 2.78.0 ± 1.4
Likelihood to continuing a formal meditation practice in the future8.3 ± 1.97.8 ± 2.38.8 ± 1.37.7 ± 2.69.2 ± 0.89.0 ± 0.98.0 ± 2.27.7 ± 2.58.5 ± 1.7
Likelihood of continuing brief mindfulness practices in the future8.6 ± 2.18.8 ± 2.27.0 ± 3.38.4 ± 2.39.7 ± 0.59.7 ± 0.88.5 ± 2.48.7 ± 1.47.5 ± 3.0

Global Assessment of Treatment (completed at the 8-week follow-up; N = 48)

Satisfaction with the received MM therapy5.5 ± 1.46.0 ± 0.85.0 ± 2.25.6 ± 1.04.8 ± 1.86.2 ± 0.45.6 ± 2.16.0 ± 0.95.2 ± 1.4
Overall change in alcohol problem since starting the study5.8 ± 0.96.0 ± 0.05.8 ± 0.55.6 ± 0.85.8 ± 0.45.8 ± 0.86.4 ± 0.95.1 ± 0.85.8 ± 0.9
Helpfulness of the MM program for alcohol problem1.7 ± 0.71.8 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.51.6 ± 0.51.7 ± 0.51.7 ± 0.51.4 ± 0.51.8 ± 0.71.7 ± 0.7

Responses on a 0–10 Likert scale: 0 = not likely at all/not important, 10 = very likely/very important; Responses on a 1–7 Likert scale: 1 = extremely dissatisfied, 7 = extremely satisfied; Responses on a 1–7 Likert scale: 1 = very much worse, 7 = very much improved; Responses on a 1–5 Likert scale: 1 = very helpful, 5 = not helpful and has made things worse.