Positive, 44% reduction in HA intensity in 6 weeks of treatment arm. Mean change in headache intensity between sauna and control group = 1.27 points (95% CI 0.48–2.07; = 10.17; df = 1,117; )
Control group received same course of behavioural counselling, CBT, rehabilitation, and exercise therapy
VAS for pain; pain behaviour assessment by researchers with 11-item questionnaire; Zung SDS (self-rating depression scale); anger scoring with CMI (Cornell Medical Index); sleep quality with simple 0–10 scoring; degree of satisfaction of treatments with simple numerical scoring; return to work 2 years after intervention
Positive, increased likelihood of return to work 2 years later (); decrease in anger scoring in sauna group compared to control (4.5 ± 1.1 to 2.2 ± 1.6, )
Moderate, 2 patients excluded -could not tolerate sauna - acute bronchitis and claustrophobia
Control group received placebo, 45 min bedrest at 24°C and postrest shower in addition to the same rehab programs, physical therapy, occupational therapy
Somatic complaints with CMI (Cornell Medical Index); Zung SDS (self-rating depression scale); VAS for hunger and relaxation; plasma levels of ghrelin, glucose, catechol-amines; daily caloric intake.
Positive, improved somatic complaints (), improved hunger scores (), and improved relaxation scores () in sauna group compared to control group. Plasma ghrelin concentrations and daily caloric intake increased in sauna group (, and ,, respectively); = Student 2-tailed -test
2 single-group (side-by-side) intervention pilot trials
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS)/The Netherlands
34
FIR
4 weeks
No control group; two groups receiving same sauna intervention
VAS, EPM-ROM (Escola Paulista de Medicina range of motion), DUTCH-AIMS (Dutch arthritis impact measurement scales), BASMI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis functional index of range of motion), BASDAI (Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis disease activity index); serum ESR
Positive, pain and stiffness decreased in RA () and AS () groups during sauna sessions only.
Mild- 12−24% scoring uncomfortable on well-being scores during beginning of sauna
Positive, 7/9 in sauna group improved during sessions; 4/9 were still improved at follow-up 9−40 months afterwards; 2/9 non-responders. 3/6 controls receiving usual treatment improved at follow-up
Moderate- heat intolerance in most participants, protocol changed.
Females with fibromyalgia and autoimmune disorders/Japan
44
FIR
12 weeks
Sauna only one part of intervention; combined with underwater exercise therapy; no control group
VAS-visual analogue scale; no. of tender pts on clinical exam; FIQ (fibromyalgia impact questionnaire); SF-36 quality of life questionnaire
Positive, reduced VAS pain scores (); fewer # of tender pts (); reduced symptoms based upon FIQ (); improved quality of life on SF-36 questionnaire (–0.05) after combined sauna + underwater exercise therapy
None
FIR = Far-infrared sauna; ESR = erythrocyte sedimentation rate; VAS = visual analogue scale; CBT = cognitive behavioural therapy.