Research Article

The Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Gumiganghwal-Tang in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Phase II Randomized Double Blind Placebo Controlled Study

Table 4

Comparisons of secondary efficacy.

GMGHT group (n= 61)Placebo group (n= 66)p value

Change in patient’s global assessment from baseline
week-10.4 (10.8)-1.7 (5.8)2.50 x 10−7
week-17.4 (19.0)-4.5 (6.6)3.24 x 10−6
week-22.5 (20.7)-9.0 (12.8)3.04 x 10−5
Change in patient’s pain assessment from baseline
week-11.1 (11.0)-2.2 (5,2)1.32 x 10−7
week-17.5 (19.7)-5.4 (6.6)2.07 x 10−5
week-22.4 (21.3)-9.6 (14.4)1.62 x 10−4
Change in physician’s global assessment from baseline
week-13.3 (12.0)-0.5 (6.1)4.67 x 10−11
week-21.0 (19.4)-1.8 (8.3)3.89 x 10−10
week-23.8 (20.9)-7.9 (16.9)6.57 x 10−6
Change in pain WOMAC score from baseline
week-2.8 (2.6)-0.7 (1.8)1.45 x 10−6
week-3.9 (4.0)-1.2 (2.0)8.12 x 10−6
week-4.5 (4.0)-1.7 (2.4)6.82 x 10−6
Change in stiffness WOMAC score from baseline
week-0.2 (1.4)-0.1 (1.3)0.75
week-1.6 (1.6)-0.7 (1.3)1.27 x 10−3
week-1.6 (1.6)-1.3 (1.7)0.22
Change in function WOMAC score from baseline
week-7.3 (8.6)-1.7 (3.0)7.49 x 10−6
week-12.8 (12.2)-2.2 (3.3)7.16 x 10−9
week-15.0 (12.8)-4.2 (5.3)3.26 x 10−8

Values are presented as mean (SD) unless otherwise stated.
GMGHT: Gumiganghwal-tang, SD: standard deviation, WOMAC: the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index.