Research Article

Comparison of the Outcomes of Three Different Nutritional Supports in Patients with Oral and Maxillofacial Malignant Tumors following Surgery

Table 1

Baseline characteristics of the three groups before surgery.

ItemsPN+EN group (n=58)TPN group (n=33)TEN group (n=21)Test valuesP values

Age (years) (Mean ± SD)54.50 ± 10.3857.64 ± 10.3353.90 ± 9.931.2200.299
Lifestyle
Smoker
 Ever15 (13.39%)9 (8.04%)3 (2.68%)6.7690.343
 Occasionally15 (13.39%)5 (4.46%)6 (5.36%)
 Regularly14 (12.50%)5 (4.46%)7 (6.25%)
 Quitted14 (12.50%)14 (12.50%)5 (4.46%)
Drinking
 Ever7 (6.25%)3 (2.68%)011.9200.042
 Occasionally35 (31.25%)20 (17.86%)17 (15.18%)
 Regularly4 (3.57%)03 (2.68%)
 Quitted12 (10.71%)10 (8.93%)1 (0.89%)
Gender, Female24 (21.38%)13 (11.61%)9 (8.04%)0.1140.966
Educational level
 ≤ 9 years20 (17.86%)8 (7.14%)8 (7.14%)6.4340.171
 11-12 years16 (14.29%)15 (13.39%)10 (8.93%)
 > 12 years22 (19.64%)10 (8.93%)3 (2.68%)
Medical History
 Hypertension10 (8.93%)4 (3.57%)3 (2.68%)0.4220.937
 Hyperlipemia6 (5.36%)1 (0.89%)1 (0.89%)1.5280.551
 Diabetes9 (8.04%)7 (6.25%)05.3280.076
 Heart disease3 (2.68%)2 (1.79%)1 (0.89%)0.2950.975
 Cerebrovascular Disease8 (7.14%)6 (5.36%)2 (1.79%)0.7630.723
 Joint disease4 (3.57%)3 (2.68%)01.6170.443
Pathological type
 Malignant ameloblastoma8 (7.14%)2 (1.79%)3 (2.68%)14.6650.799
 Malignant mixed tumor4 (3.57%)5 (4.46%)1 (0.89%)
 Malignant lymphoma1 (0.89%)2 (1.79%)0
 Ossifying fibroma.5 (4.46%)3 (2.68%)4 (3.57%)
 Basal cell carcinoma5 (4.46%)4 (3.57%)2 (1.79%)
 Oral cancer invade mandible.10 (8.93%)3 (2.68%)6 (5.36%)
 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma5 (4.46%)5 (4.46%)1 (0.89%)
 Adenocarcinoma2 (1.79%)1 (0.89%)1 (0.89%)
 Adenoid cystic carcinoma3 (2.68%)2 (1.79%)1 (0.89%)
 Squamous cell carcinoma9 (8.04%)5 (4.46%)1 (0.89%)
 Odontogenic Keratocyst6 (5.36%)1 (0.89%)1 (0.89%)

Significantly different among groups (P < 0.05).
Values are demonstrated as n (%) for chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, and as the mean, SD for one-way ANOVA test.
SD: standard deviations.