Research Article

Comparison of the Outcomes of Three Different Nutritional Supports in Patients with Oral and Maxillofacial Malignant Tumors following Surgery

Table 4

FPS-R, VAS, NRS, and SF-36 scores of the three groups after surgery (7 day).

ItemsPN+EN group (n=58)TPN group (n=33)TEN group (n=21)Test valuesP values

Wong-Banker FPS-R scores5.0 (4.0, 5.0)2.0 (2.0, 3.0)5.0 (4.0, 5.0)64.2050.000
VAS scores5.0 (5.0, 6.0)2.0 (2.0, 3.0)6.0 (6.0, 7.0)81.0160.000
NRS scores5.0 (5.0, 6.0)3.0 (2.0, 3.0)6.0 (5.0, 6.0)69.8090.000
OFBDDSS scores57.12 ± 14.5952.58 ± 12.5253.95 ± 9.521.3620.260
Self - overall appearance evaluation scores5.50 ± 0.825.18 ± 0.775.48 ± 0.681.8580.161
SF-36 scores40.15 ± 3.6839.00 ± 2.6940.91 ± 3.360.7650.472

Significantly different among groups (P < 0.05).
Values are demonstrated as n (%) for chi-square or Fisher’s exact tests, as the mean ± standard deviations for one-way ANOVA test and as Median, (Quartil 25, Quartil 75) for Kruskal-Wails H test.
FPS-R, Faces Pain Scale-Revised; VAS, visual analogue scale; NRS, Numerical rating scale; OFBDDSS, Oral-Facial Body Dysmorphic Disorder Self-Scale; SF-36, short-form 36 health survey questionnaire.