Research Article

Investigation into the Individualized Treatment of Traditional Chinese Medicine through a Series of N-of-1 Trials

Table 2

The mean value of patient self-reported symptom scores (individualized decoction versus control decoction) of each N-of-1 trial.

Number of caseControl decoction Individualized decoctionMean difference 
(95% CI)
-valuePreference to the 
two decoctions
Cycle 
1
cycle 
2
cycle 
3
Cycle 
1
cycle 
2
cycle 
3

Case 1.461.411.111.441.491.11−0.02 (−0.16, 0.11)0.54No
Case 3.07-2.853.00-3.11No
Case 3.333.493.192.802.843.370.34 (−0.78, 1.45)0.32Individualized decoction
Case 2.061.681.561.911.621.670.03 (−0.29, 0.36)0.71No
Case --2.27--2.23Individualized decoction
Case 1.671.631.831.531.711.830.02 (−0.25, 0.29)0.78No
Case 3.132.632.702.662.342.230.41 (0.15, 0.67)0.02No
Case 3.402.522.382.832.40-No
Case 1.892.061.881.791.912.000.04 (−0.32, 0.41)0.66No
Case 2.202.102.072.071.801.830.22 (0.02, 0.43)0.04No
Case 2.682.282.122.542.202.010.11 (0.03, 0.19)0.03No
Case 3.462.892.793.172.742.490.25 (0.03, 0.47)0.04No
Case 2.482.141.762.101.811.390.36 (0.30, 0.42)0.001No
Case 1.69-1.711.36-1.36No

were not included in the statistical analysis due to an acute exacerbation during the cycle. individual statistic analysis due to incomplete data. as “responder” according to the clinical criteria.