Review Article

Effectiveness and Safety of Compound Chinese Medicine plus Routine Western Medicine in In-Stent Restenosis: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Table 3

Quality of the included RCTs as assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias assessment.
(a)

Quality assessment criteriaDAI GF
2017
CHEN K2013CHEN K2014CHENG SJ2010DAI GF
2010
DAI GF
2011
DENG XD2013GAO XX2012GONG XY2016HAN P2012LI B2014LI CW
2014
LI QZ
2016
LIU LL
2010

Random sequence generation+--+----+----+
Allocation concealment-----------+--
Blinding of participants and personnel++++++++++++++
Blinding of outcome assessment++++++++++++++
Incomplete outcome data-++++++++---++
Selective reporting++++++-+++++++
Other bias++++++++++++++
Overall quality score (maximum = 7)55565545644556

(b)

Quality assessment criteriaLU HW
2014
MEI CL
2011
MENG XL2016NIU XY2012PENG WD2015REN DD2016REN XY2012SHI QJ2014SI XC
2013
SUN QY2016TANG YY2016WANG K2015WANG KL2016

Random sequence generation+--+-+-+-+--+
Allocation concealment-------------
Blinding of participants and personnel+++++++++++++
Blinding of outcome assessment+++++++++++++
Incomplete outcome data+++++++++++-+
Selective reporting+++++++++++++
Other bias+++++++++++++
Overall quality score (maximum = 7)6556565656546

(c)

Quality assessment criteriaWANG X2016WANG XD2010WANG ZQ2013XIAO NH2016XU MT2016YANG TL2016ZHANG PF2014ZHANG Q2013ZHANG RZ2017ZHANG Y2015ZHOU JC2016ZHOU W2015ZHU HB2016

Random sequence generation+-+--------+-
Allocation concealment-------------
Blinding of participants and personnel+++++++++++++
Blinding of outcome assessment+++++++++++++
Incomplete outcome data+++++++-+++-+
Selective reporting+++++++++++++
Other bias+++++++++++++
Overall quality score (maximum = 7)6565555455555