Review Article

Evidence-Based Study to Compare Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material and Non-Daodi Traditional Chinese Medicinal Material

Table 4

Ingredients of the studied medicine/soil physical and chemical properties/GBS.

Comparison of medicinal composition, GBS, and soil propertiesNumber (%) of studies,

Medicinal composition
Inorganic elements
 Element differences24 (58.5%)
 Detection method22 (53.7%)
 Correlation analysis12 (29.3%)
 Accumulation ability11 (26.8%)
 Character index7 (17.1%)
 Others7 (17.1%)
Organic component
 Active substance26 (63.4%)
 Extracts5 (12.2%)
 Total ash proportion4 (9.8%)
 Polysaccharide4 (9.8%)
 Others6 (14.6%)
Morphologic
 Physiological anatomy or functional observation11 (26.8%)
 Microanatomy2 (4.9%)
 Ultrastructure1 (2.4%)
Germplasm resource7 (17.1%)
Genetic contrast4 (9.8%)
Endophyte microbes and metabolites3 (7.3%)
Others6 (14.6%)
GBS and soil physical-chemical properties
Soil properties
 Inorganic elements15 (36.6%)
 pH9 (22.0%)
 Soil characteristics and type8 (19.5%)
 Available nutrients7 (17.1%)
 Organic material6 (14.6%)
 Physical clay4 (9.8%)
 Soil structure3 (7.3%)
 BS3 (7.3%)
 CEC3 (7.3%)
 Total nutrients2 (4.9%)
 Soil color2 (4.9%)
 Soil moisture2 (4.9%)
 Others2 (4.9%)
GBS
 Altitude8 (19.5%)
 Latitude7 (17.1%)
 Type of climate or conditions7 (17.1%)
 Annual sunshine duration, rainfall, and temperature7 (17.1%)
 Soil parent material5 (12.2%)
 Topography4 (9.8%)
 Climatic regionalization4 (9.8%)
 Landforms3 (7.3%)
 Vegetation regionalization3 (7.3%)
 Hydrological regionalization3 (7.3%)
 Clay mineral composition2 (4.9%)
 Others3 (7.3%)