Research Article

Analysis of Facial Features according to Sasang Types between Native Japanese and Native Korean Populations

Table 4

Male facial feature variables with differences among the samples and Sasang types.

SamplesSasang typesSample
Sasang types
Facial variablesSample ASample BP valueTESESYP valueP value

FA_18_17_4377.55 (1.16)83.12 (0.50)<0.00182.74 80.68 77.58 0.0060.160
FA_118_117_14378.39 (1.08)82.81 (0.47)<0.00182.96 80.48 78.37 0.0080.079
FArea02_aD6787.01 (114.31)7266.28 (49.14)<0.0017245.54 7064.10 6770.29 0.0120.074
FArea03_aD3831.44 (72.95)4089.65 (31.36)0.0024119.47 3948.55 3813.62 0.0080.288
FDH_25_12597.86 (0.92)104.46 (0.39)<0.001102.63 101.65 99.20 0.0270.123
FA_18_17_25128.72 (1.21)133.30 (0.52)0.001133.14 131.89 127.99 0.0090.162
FA_118_117_125127.94 (1.16)132.30 (0.50)0.001132.27 130.84 127.26 0.0080.132
FAis_18_1732.03 (0.80)29.47 (0.34)0.00528.89 30.52 32.85 0.0020.265
FAi_118_11731.71 (0.82)29.48 (0.35)0.01529.01 30.42 32.35 0.0140.230
PD_7_773.15 (0.28)2.36 (0.12)0.0112.60 2.39 3.28 0.0480.224
PDH_12_1419.48 (0.40)20.66 (0.17)0.00920.58 20.53 19.11 0.0150.099

Sample A: native Japanese, Sample B: native Koreans; TE: Tae-Eum, SE: So-Eum, SY: So-Yang.
Data were presented as adjusted mean (standard error)
values were calculated using one-way ANCOVA. Post hoc comparisons using Bonferroni.
a, b, c: Significant difference between the groups, in which the value descends by a and b followed by c.
ab: no significant difference among the groups.