Review Article

Electroacupuncture for Postoperative Urinary Retention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

Level of evidence.

VariableEffect(OR/MD)95%CIPI2(%)P(X2 test)Statistical MethodStudies (N)Sample size (N)Level of evidence

Therapeutic effect (<=1w)4.213.04, 5.83<0.00001330.09Fixed effects models161382Very low
Therapeutic effect (>1w)8.392.91, 24.25<0.0001610.02Random effects models7565Very low
EA versus medication36.191.78, 734.320.02830.003Random effects models3187Very low
EA versus physiotherapy4.392.04, 9.420.000200.71Random effects models4378Low
Residual urine volume (<=1w)-13.24-13.70, -10.78<0.00001430.12Fixed effects models6555Low
Residual urine volume (>1w)-2.02-3.07, -0.980.000195<0.00001Random effects models6471Very low
First urinating time-0.92-1.37, -0.46<0.0001790.0009Random effects models5418Very low
Minute-1.24-1.55, -0.93<0.00001350.22Random effects models3197Low
Hour-0.36-0.67, -0.040.03Random effects models1154Moderate
Day-0.66-1.15, -0.160.009Random effects models167Very low
Bladder capacity (<=1w)0.560.30, 0.83<0.000100.63Fixed effects models2230Low
Bladder capacity (>1w)0.920.61, 1.23<0.00001350.22Fixed effects models2180Low
Urinary flow rate (<=1w)0.910.64, 1.18<0.0000140.31Fixed effects models2230Low
Urinary flow rate (>1w)1.690.59, 2.790.003880.0003Random effects models3200Very low
EA versus medication2.651.95, 3.36<0.00001Random effects models160Very low
EA versus physiotherapy1.060.70, 1.42<0.0000100.4Random effects models2140Very low