Review Article
Electroacupuncture for Postoperative Urinary Retention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
| Variable | Effect(OR/MD) | 95%CI | P | I2(%) | P(X2 test) | Statistical Method | Studies (N) | Sample size (N) | Level of evidence |
| Therapeutic effect (<=1w) | 4.21 | 3.04, 5.83 | <0.00001 | 33 | 0.09 | Fixed effects models | 16 | 1382 | Very low | Therapeutic effect (>1w) | 8.39 | 2.91, 24.25 | <0.0001 | 61 | 0.02 | Random effects models | 7 | 565 | Very low | EA versus medication | 36.19 | 1.78, 734.32 | 0.02 | 83 | 0.003 | Random effects models | 3 | 187 | Very low | EA versus physiotherapy | 4.39 | 2.04, 9.42 | 0.0002 | 0 | 0.71 | Random effects models | 4 | 378 | Low | Residual urine volume (<=1w) | -13.24 | -13.70, -10.78 | <0.00001 | 43 | 0.12 | Fixed effects models | 6 | 555 | Low | Residual urine volume (>1w) | -2.02 | -3.07, -0.98 | 0.0001 | 95 | <0.00001 | Random effects models | 6 | 471 | Very low | First urinating time | -0.92 | -1.37, -0.46 | <0.0001 | 79 | 0.0009 | Random effects models | 5 | 418 | Very low | Minute | -1.24 | -1.55, -0.93 | <0.00001 | 35 | 0.22 | Random effects models | 3 | 197 | Low | Hour | -0.36 | -0.67, -0.04 | 0.03 | — | — | Random effects models | 1 | 154 | Moderate | Day | -0.66 | -1.15, -0.16 | 0.009 | — | — | Random effects models | 1 | 67 | Very low | Bladder capacity (<=1w) | 0.56 | 0.30, 0.83 | <0.0001 | 0 | 0.63 | Fixed effects models | 2 | 230 | Low | Bladder capacity (>1w) | 0.92 | 0.61, 1.23 | <0.00001 | 35 | 0.22 | Fixed effects models | 2 | 180 | Low | Urinary flow rate (<=1w) | 0.91 | 0.64, 1.18 | <0.00001 | 4 | 0.31 | Fixed effects models | 2 | 230 | Low | Urinary flow rate (>1w) | 1.69 | 0.59, 2.79 | 0.003 | 88 | 0.0003 | Random effects models | 3 | 200 | Very low | EA versus medication | 2.65 | 1.95, 3.36 | <0.00001 | — | — | Random effects models | 1 | 60 | Very low | EA versus physiotherapy | 1.06 | 0.70, 1.42 | <0.00001 | 0 | 0.4 | Random effects models | 2 | 140 | Very low |
|
|