Comparative Efficacy of Chinese Herbal Injections for Treating Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Table 1
Ranking of CHIs for different outcomes based on SUCRA.
Intervention
CKZ+WM
CXQ+WM
DH+WM
HQ+WM
RDN+WM
SF+WM
SM+WM
SMI+WM
TRQ+WM
XBJ+WM
XXN+WM
XYP+WM
WM
RCE
SUCRA(%)
32.4
69.4
85.5
76.7
54.5
19.1
59.5
39.5
55.2
51.6
67.8
38.8
0
N
9
9
13
6
10
7
12
6
48
22
7
7
154
Rank
11
3
1
2
7
12
5
9
6
8
4
10
13
FEV1%
SUCRA(%)
43.3
49.2
51.9
69
75.1
47.8
76.6
-
41.9
58.8
-
20.1
16.2
N
3
2
1
2
4
4
6
-
7
4
-
2
35
Rank
8
6
5
3
2
7
1
-
9
4
-
10
11
FEV1/FVC
SUCRA(%)
45.8
56.1
30.4
48.2
73.63
52.1
66.9
-
58.3
67.6
-
30.9
20.1
N
1
1
1
1
4
4
5
-
9
7
-
2
34
Rank
8
5
10
7
1
6
3
-
4
2
-
9
11
PaCO2
SUCRA(%)
32.8
49.2
-
59.1
75.2
50.7
54.9
83.6
43.4
35
48.7
51.3
16.1
N
3
4
-
1
2
2
3
2
14
7
1
1
40
Rank
11
7
-
3
2
6
4
1
9
10
8
5
12
PaO2
SUCRA(%)
45.2
45.9
-
60.9
71.9
47.4
51
56.1
49.3
30.9
73.8
53.2
14.4
N
3
4
-
1
2
2
3
2
14
7
1
1
40
Rank
10
9
-
3
2
8
6
4
7
11
1
5
12
pH
SUCRA(%)
-
40.3
-
-
70
49.3
58.4
-
51.3
48.4
61
-
21.3
N
-
2
-
-
2
4
3
-
11
5
1
-
28
Rank
-
7
-
-
1
5
3
-
4
6
2
-
8
CRP
SUCRA(%)
45.9
-
52.2
60.6
53
-
37
57.4
63.3
51.3
59.2
48.8
21.3
N
1
-
1
1
4
-
1
3
10
11
1
3
36
Rank
9
-
6
2
5
-
10
4
1
7
3
8
11
WBCC
SUCRA(%)
50.4
-
-
-
67
-
-
58
43.1
59.6
-
45.1
26.8
N
1
-
-
-
1
-
-
1
8
7
-
2
20
Rank
4
-
-
-
1
-
-
3
6
2
-
5
7
N%
SUCRA(%)
84.1
-
-
-
-
-
-
66.1
29.7
56.5
-
43.5
20.2
N
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
1
5
6
-
2
15
Rank
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
2
5
3
-
4
6
N, number of RCTs; , it includes a direct comparison, that is, TRQ combining with WM versus XYP combining with WM.
