Research Article

A Brief Body-Mind-Spirit Group Therapy for Chinese Medicine Stagnation Syndrome: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Table 3

Within-group comparison of outcomes: baseline assessment, posttest, and 2-month follow-up assessment.

Intervention Group (n=56)Baseline Assessment(T0)Posttest (T1) Two-month Follow-up Assessment (T2)
Control Group (n=55)Mean (SD)Mean (SD)Effect size (d)Mean (SD)Effect size (d)

Self-report ScalesStagnation Total
 Intervention group85.2(23.5)64.3(22.7)-0.9066.9(23.6)-0.78
 Control group78.1(26.8)73.0(26.7)-0.1967.9(24.6)-0.40
Body-mind Obstruction
 Intervention group26.2(9.4)17.2(7.8)-1.0418.7(8.8)-0.82
 Control group24.2(10.2)22.1(9.8)-0.2119.7(8.1)-0.47
Affect-posture Inhibition
 Intervention group18.0(7.6)13.4(6.5)-0.6514.9(7.4)-0.41
 Control group17.5(7.8)16.6(7.6)-0.1115.1(6.9)-0.33
Overattachment
 Intervention group40.1(12.3)30.3(10.5)-0.8630.7(10.5)-0.82
 Control group38.2(13.6)34.6(13.3)-0.2732.6(13.5)-0.41
Depression
 Intervention group11.0(4.4)7.8(3.7)-0.797.6(4.2)-0.79
 Control group10.3(5.1)9.4(4.9)-0.188.9(5.0)-0.28
Anxiety
 Intervention group9.1(3.0)7.7(3.0)-0.477.6(3.2)-0.48
 Control group10.1(4.1)9.9(4.4)-0.058.7(3.7)-0.36
Physical Distress
 Intervention group55.3(25.2)37.4(19.2)-0.8043.8(25.2)-0.47
 Control group56.7(25.7)50.7(25.8)-0.2346.7(24.0)-0.40
Everyday Functioning
 Intervention group47.7(11.1)53.9(12.5)0.5254.5(12.7)0.57
 Control group46.4(13.6)47.4(13.1)0.0747.4(14.1)0.07
Negative Affect
 Intervention group49.2(21.3)40.4(19.8)-0.4339.4(21.3)-0.46
 Control group50.5(19.3)50.3(21.2)-0.0145.2(22.0)-0.26
Positive Affect
 Intervention group36.5(11.1)39.4(12.1)0.2540.3(13.0)0.31
 Control group36.1(15.4)37.2(6.1)0.0936.9(17.6)0.05
Salivary CortisolMean Cortisol (log nmol/L)
 Intervention group3.6(2.0)2.9(1.3)-0.563.0(1.3)-0.48
 Control group3.4 (2.0)2.8(1.5)-0.433.5(2.2)0.03
Cortisol Slope
 Intervention group-0.15 (0.10)-0.17(0.11)0.19-0.13(0.10)-0.19
 Control group-0.15(0.10)-0.18(0.11)0.29-0.18(0.21)0.18

p ≤ .05. p ≤ .01. p ≤.001.