Review Article
Acupuncture for Primary Dysmenorrhea: An Overview of Systematic Reviews
Table 4
Reporting quality assessment of systematic reviews by PRISMA.
| No. | Section/Topic | Cho 2010 [8] | Chen 2012 [11] | Jiang 2013 [9] | Liu 2017 [10] | Yu 2017 [12] |
| 1 | TITLE | Title | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 2 | ABSTRACT | Structured summary | Y | N | N | Y | N | 3 | INTRODUCTION | Rationale | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 4 | Objectives | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 5 | METHODS | Protocol and registration | N | N | N | N | N | 6 | | Eligibility criteria | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 7 | | Information sources | Y | py | py | py | py | 8 | | Search | N | N | N | N | N | 9 | | Study selection | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 10 | | Data collection process | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 11 | | Data items | py | py | py | Y | Y | 12 | | Risk of bias in individual studies | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 13 | | Summary measures | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 14 | | Synthesis of results | N/A | Y | Y | Y | Y | 15 | | Risk of bias across studies | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 16 | | Additional analyses | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 17 | | Study selection | Y | Y | py | Y | Y | 18 | | Study characteristics | Y | py | Y | py | py | 19 | | Risk of bias within studies | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 20 | | Results of individual studies | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 21 | | Synthesis of results | N/A | Y | Y | Y | Y | 22 | | Risk of bias across studies | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 23 | | Additional analysis | N | Y | Y | Y | Y | 24 | DISCUSSION | Summary of evidence | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 25 | | Limitations | Y | Y | py | Y | Y | 26 | | Conclusions | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | 27 | FUNDING | Funding | Y | N | py | py | py |
| | TOTAL SCORE | | 21 | 20 | 19 | 22 | 21 |
|
|