Review Article

Acupuncture Treatment for Chronic Pelvic Pain in Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Table 1

Characteristics of the included RCTs for pelvic pain.

First author, yearType of conditions related to pelvic painsample size  
(randomized//analysed)
Experimental group  
(intervention, regimen)
Control group  
(intervention, regimen)
Outcome measuresMain resultsAEs

Amin, 2015 [11]n.r.127/117(A) Electro-acupuncture, n=55, 12 sessions (2 times per week for 6 weeks)(B) CT (inferior hypogastric plexus blockade), n=62, 1 sessions(1) VAS  
(2) TER for chronic pelvic pain
(1) Significant difference in and   
(2) (B) better than (A)
None

Li, 2016[12]Pelvic adhesion96/96(A) WA (using moxibustion) + CT (physical therapy), n=47, 10 sessions (1 times per day for 10 days)(B) CT (physical therapy), n=49, 10 sessions (1 times per day for 10 days)(1) NRS  
(2) TER for chronic pelvic pain
(1) Positiv  
(2) Positiv
n.r.

Liu, 2012 [13]Pelvic  
inflammatory disease
101/101(A) WA (using moxibustion) + CT (cefuroxime axetil), n=48, 7 sessions for WAT (1 times per day for 7 days) and 14 sessions for CM (2 times per day for 7 days)(B) CT (cefuroxime axetil), n=53, 14 sessions (2 times per day for 7 days)(1) TER for chronic pelvic pain(1) Positivn.r.

Xiao, 2013[14]Pelvic  
inflammatory disease
160/160(A) TET + AA, n=100, 2 sessions for TEF (1 times per 4 weeks for 8 weeks) and 8 sessions for AA (1 times per week for 8 weeks)(B) CT (levofloxacin capsule), n=60, 2 sessions (2 times for week)(1) TER for chronic pelvic pain(1) Positivn.r.

< 0.05; < 0.01; < 0.001
AA: auricular acupuncture; AEs: adverse events; CT: conventional treatment; n.r.: not reported; NRS: Numerical Rating Scale; NS: no significant difference; QOL: quality of life; TET: thread embedding therapy; VAS: visual analogue scale; WA: warm acupuncture.