Research Article
Analysis of Factors Influencing the Efficiency of Acupuncture in Tinnitus Patients
Table 4
Comparison of the treatment responses between PA and PADA groups.
| | PA group (n = 38) | PADA group (n = 69) | p value |
| The score change of | 0.253 | Before treatment | 5.55 ± 2.26 | 5.08 ± 1.91 | | After treatment | 4.29 ± 2.44 | 3.41 ± 2.16 | | Decrease in | 1.26 ± 1.83 | 1.67 ± 1.72 | | p value | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | |
| The percentage change of Baseline (improvement) | 0.049 | Decrease in /Baseline | 0.17 ± 0.48 | 0.33 ± 0.32 | | p value | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | |
| The decrease in /Baseline | 0.026 | ≥ 30% | 14 | 42 | | < 30% | 24 | 27 | |
| CGI-I | 0.06 | Before treatment | 4 | 4 | | After treatment | 3.13 ± 1.12 | 2.77 ± 1.16 | | p value | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | |
| CGI-I | 0.089 | CGI-I ≤ 3 | 21 | 50 | | CGI-I ≥ 4 | 17 | 19 | |
|
|
PA: periauricular acupoints; PADA: periauricular acupoints + distal acupoints; : visual analog scale; CGI-I: Clinical Global Impression–Improvement scale. |