Research Article
Safety Evaluation of a New Traditional Chinese Medical Formula, Ciji-Hua’ai-Baosheng II Formula, in Adult Rodent Models
Table 11
Hematological cytologic marker values of rats treated with CHB-II-F after 2 weeks of recovery period in the sub-chronic toxicity test.
| Parameters | Dose (g/kg) | Control | 26.20 | 13.10 | 6.55 |
| Male | | WBC (109/L) | 3.88±1.08 | 2.03±0.51 | 4.32±1.10 | 5.63±2.11 | Neu (%) | 29.60±9.01 | 30.60±9.36 | 19.88±6.23 | 20.50±4.09 | Lym (%) | 65.95±9.07 | 65.25±10.34 | 77.75±6.78 | 76.53±4.63 | Mon (%) | 2.95±0.49 | 2.25±0.99 | 1.00±0.38 | 2.05±0.89 | Eos (%) | 1.18±0.23 | 1.63±0.74 | 1.75±0.45 | 0.78±0.25 | Bas (%) | 0.33±0.06 | 0.28±0.03 | 0.20±0.04 | 0.25±0.03 | RBC (1012/L) | 7.81±0.15 | 7.55±0.56 | 7.98±0.22 | 8.16±0.24 | HGB (g/L) | 143.00±4.18 | 135.00±6.01 | 138.75±2.75 | 147.25±2.75 | HCT (%) | 42.25±1.06 | 41.50±2.69 | 42.53±0.88 | 43.68±1.10 | MCV (fL) | 54.13±0.70 | 55.13±1.02 | 53.35±0.95 | 53.53±0.32 | MCH (pg) | 18.38±0.30 | 18.00±0.59 | 17.40±0.29 | 18.03±0.21 | MCHC (g/L) | 339.00±3.44 | 326.50±8.14 | 326.25±1.03 | 336.50±2.22 | PLT (109/L) | 995.00±30.73 | 915.75±56.34 | 1045.00±87.99 | 885.25±32.70 | Female | | WBC (109/L) | 1.32±0.36 | 1.39±0.18 | 2.62±0.53 | 1.62±0.42 | Neu (%) | 21.95±4.44 | 32.50±6.46 | 17.80±5.32 | 17.55±1.51 | Lym (%) | 70.45±8.02 | 59.73±8.03 | 79.15±5.72 | 80.10±1.08 | Mon (%) | 6.23±3.55 | 4.30±0.66 | 1.75±0.13 | 1.63±0.64 | Eos (%) | 1.08±0.33 | 3.28±1.42 | 1.08±0.45 | 0.48±0.12 | Bas (%) | 0.30±0.11 | 0.20±0.04 | 0.23±0.06 | 0.25±0.03 | RBC (1012/L) | 7.05±0.15 | 7.08±0.37 | 6.90±0.37 | 7.15±0.11 | HGB (g/L) | 137.00±1.47 | 131.50±2.90 | 132.00±5.40 | 136.25±3.07 | HCT (%) | 39.60±0.09 | 39.50±1.05 | 39.53±0.97 | 40.05±0.52 | MCV (fL) | 56.23±1.05 | 56.10±1.75 | 57.55±1.88 | 55.98±0.46 | MCH (pg) | 19.48±0.33 | 18.73±0.72 | 19.15±0.42 | 19.08±0.30 | MCHC (g/L) | 346.00±3.19 | 333.50±2.75 | 333.50±7.37 | 340.00±4.74 | PLT (109/L) | 1025.50±115.74 | 880.75±77.51 | 1065.00±84.52 | 857.25±92.28 |
|
|
Note: Data were presented as the mean ±SD from 6 rats. No statistically significant differences were found (P > 0.05).
|