Classic Chinese Acupuncture versus Different Types of Control Groups for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2000–2018)

<div>Methodological characteristics of the twelve best-scored trials. <object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ecam/volume-2019/6283912/figures/6283912.fig-inline.001a.svgz" name="6283912.fig-inline.001a" type="image/svg+xml"></object> stands for YES, <object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ecam/volume-2019/6283912/figures/6283912.fig-inline.001b.svgz" name="6283912.fig-inline.001b" type="image/svg+xml"></object> stands for NO, and <object data="https://static.hindawi.com/articles/ecam/volume-2019/6283912/figures/6283912.fig-inline.001c.svgz" name="6283912.fig-inline.001c" type="image/svg+xml"></object>stands for UNKNOWN.</div>

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: Classic Chinese Acupuncture versus Different Types of Control Groups for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2000–2018) 

Figure 2 | Classic Chinese Acupuncture versus Different Types of Control Groups for the Treatment of Chronic Pain: Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2000–2018) 