Review Article

Effectiveness of Acupuncturing at the Sphenopalatine Ganglion Acupoint Alone for Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies.

StudyAgeCourse of the diseaseDiagnosisInterventionSample size (male/female)OutcomesFrequency (period)Follow-up timeWithdrawal or lost to follow-upAdverse eventsPlace
(A/C)(A/C)(A/C)AC(A/C)(A/C)(A/C)

Chen 201521~39/21~39More than 4 W/more than 4 WA1SGA/SA11/99/10A2, A91 per W (3W)/1 per W (3W)NR2/4Blood stasis occurs after acupuncture on the cheek: 1/noneBeijing

Chen 2013 (A)
21~58 (37.0 ± 10.3)
ORA:24~53 (36.7 ± 8.7)
55.6M (mean)
53.4M (mean)

A3


SGA with EA
ORA with EA

13/17
15/15

A4, A9, A13, A14, A15


2 per W (4W)
2 per W (4W)

NR


NR


NR


Guangzhou
Chen 2013 (B) WM:19~55 (35.0 ± 11.2)46.7M (mean)WM14/162 per D (28D)

Xu 201639 ± 10/42 ± 1061.2 ± 49.2M/59.7 ± 58.2MA5, A6SGA/ORA15/2512/28The evaluation of the curative effect according to symptoms and signs of A3, A4, A7, A8, A131 or 2 per W (1M, 8 at most)/2 per W (1M, 8 in total)NR5/6Bleeding after acupuncture: 2/noneBeijing

Ni 20069~58 (mean=31.3)/11~61 (mean=33.5)2~15Y (mean=5.5Y)/1.5~16Y (mean=4.5Y)NRSGA/WM106/89103/88The evaluation of the curative effect according to symptoms and signs of A3, A131 per D (7D)/3 per D (7D)NRNoneNRHuzhou

Li 201729.6 ± 13.4/27.1 ± 17.211.5 ± 6.9Y/10.6 ± 7.2YNRSGA/ORA48/2674/45A131 per W (2M)/1 per D (2M)NRNRNRNR

Zheng 2009NRNRA3SGA/ORA8/12Healthy people: 9/11(A9+A10); serum SP content; A131 per 2D for 30 times, take a 7-day break every two times (both groups)YNone/2NRFuzhou
ORA: 8/12

Hu 2017 (A) SGA (unilateral): 19~66 (49.22 ± 14.05)

18~69 (49.91 ± 10.61)
5M~32Y (12.36 ± 10.15Y)

6~50Y (12.77 ± 12.02Y)



A4


SGA (bilateral and unilateral separately)/ORA
13/19


16/17



A4, A9, A10, A13
1 per W (4W)


2 per W(4W)



NR
3


2
Subcutaneous hematoma (only 1 in unilateral SGA group)


Beijing
Hu 2017 (B) SGA (bilateral): 18~70 (49.17 ± 13.86)6M~30Y (10.82 ± 8.42Y)12/181 per W (4W)5

Mi 201835.87 ± 10.36/35.97 ± 9.1549.03 ± 29.84M/51.17 ± 32.39MA6SGA/SA16/1417/14A4, A9, A14, A152 per W (4W)/2 per W (4W)Y6/5NoneGuangzhou

: Chen 2013 (A) and Chen 2013 (B) are the two substudies of Chen 2013, and Hu 2017 (A) and Hu 2017 (B) are the two substudies of Hu 2017; A1: Diagnostic Criteria for Diagnosis and Therapeutic Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis (revised in 1997, Haikou); A2: Subjective Symptom Scale and Objective Evaluation Indexes of Patients with Rhinitis (Nasal resistance, Nasal acoustic reflex, Nasal exhalation NO); A3: Principles and Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis (Lanzhou, 2004); A4: the RQLQ Questionnaire; A5: Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis (2009, Wuyi mountain); A6: Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma (ARIA, 2008, WHO); A7: Visual Analogue Scale (VAS); A8: Follow-up on the number of days of recurrence; A9: Rhinitis Symptom Score (TNSS); A10: Score of the Accompanying Symptoms of Rhinitis (TNNSS); A11: Duration of efficacy after treatment; A12: the time required for improvement of symptoms, signs, and accompanying symptoms after treatment; A13: Clinical efficacy (qualitative outcome); A14: RQLQ scores for emotion, nonnasal/ocular symptoms, and behavioral problem areas; A15: RQLQ sleep domain score; A16: Recurrence rate in follow-up; EA: Electric acupuncture; D: Day; W: week; M: month; Y: year; NR: nothing reported.