Research Article

Effects of Wuqinxi in the Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Table 5

The changes in electrical activities of trunk muscle strength from baseline to 24 weeks.

MuscleDifference in mean change (95% CI)Between-group difference (95% CI)
WQXGGEGGEG vs. WQXGP

RA
 30°/s10.3(1.7 to 18)11.7(1.9 to 21.5)−1.4(−13 to 10.2)0.78
 90°/s2.1(−14.1 to 18.2)7.4(−2.3 to 17.1)−5.3(−14.1 to 9.3)0.64

OEA
 30°/s8.2(4.3 to 12.1)−2.2(−3.6 to −0.9)10.4(4.3 to 24.4)#0.048
 90°/s3.0(−9.8 to 15.9)−7.5(−22.3 to 7.3)10.5(1.9 to 19.1)#0.045

ES
 30°/s−1.6(−16.6 to 13.4)3.2(−6.7 to 33.2)−4.8(−24.7 to 10.1)0.24
 90°/s3.3(−7.7 to 14.3)7.8(−8.7 to 22.8)−4.5(−19.6 to 10.7)0.69

MF
 30°/s8.4(2.9 to 13.9)15.4(1.9 to 38.9)−7(−17.8 to 4.3)0.34
 90°/s21.3(4.4 to 38.2)9.1(3.3 to 14.9)12.2(−10.7 to 35.1)0.42

The electrical activities of RA, OEA, ES, and MF were measured in the angular velocity of 30°/s and 90°/s, respectively, to assess trunk muscle strength after the end of the intervention. The changes in mean were calculated from the difference between the current value and the baseline data. Compared with baseline, ; compared with the GEG at the same time point, #. CI, confidence interval; WQXG, Wuqinxi group; GEG: general exercise group; RA, rectus abdominis; OEA, obliquus externus abdominis; ES, erector spinae; MF, multifidus.