Development of a Care Bundle for Stroke Survivors with Psychological Symptoms: Evidence Summary and Delphi Study

Table 3

Quality assessment tools.

Type of study	Quality assessment tools	Contains	Method (details)
Guideline	Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation (AGREE II) [35]	6 domains; 23 items; 2 additional items of the overall assessment	Each item is rated on a 7-point scale (1—strongly disagree to 7—strongly agree).; And a quality score is calculated for each of the six domains. Scores of the six domains are independent and could not be aggregated into one score.; Each domain score is the sum of all item scores (obtained score).; The calculating method of scaled domain score is (obtained score – minimum possible score)/(maximum possible score – minimum possible score).; Maximum possible score = 7 (strongly agree) ∗ number of items  number of appraisers, minimum possible score = 1 (strongly disagree)  number of items ∗ number of appraisers.; Two additional items of overall assessment are graded on a scale of 1 (lowest possible quality) to 7 (highest possible quality).
Expert consensus	The authenticity evaluation method of consensus articles of the Joanna Briggs Institute [36]	6 items	Each item is evaluated by Yes, No, Unclear, or Not Applicable.
Evidence summary	The quality assessment tools of guidelines, systematic reviews, and original studies included	—	—
Systematic review	Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews 2 (AMASTAR2) [37]	16 items	Each item is evaluated by Yes, Partial Yes, and No.
Randomized controlled trial	The authenticity evaluation method of RCT articles of the Joanna Briggs Institute [36]	13 items	Each item is evaluated by Yes, No, Unclear, or Not Applicable.
Cross-sectional study	The authenticity evaluation method of cross-sectional articles of the Joanna Briggs Institute [36]	8 items	Each item is evaluated by Yes, No, Unclear, or Not Applicable.