Review Article
The Effect of Art Therapy in Women with Gynecologic Cancer: A Systematic Review
Table 5
Risk of bias and quality assessment of the case report.
| Item | Yes/no/unclear/not applicable | Ginsburgs and Goodill (2009) | Ben-Arye et al. (2015) | Lee et al. (2015) |
| 1. Were patient’s demographic characteristics clearly described? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 2. Was the patient’s history clearly described and presented as a timeline? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 3. Was the current clinical condition of the patient on the presentation clear described? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 4. Were diagnostic tests or assessment methods and the results clearly described? | No | Yes | Yes | 5. Was the intervention(s) or treatment procedure(s) clearly described? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 6. Was the postintervention clinical condition clearly described? | Yes | Yes | Yes | 7. Were adverse events (harms) or unanticipated events identified and described? | No | No | No | 8. Does the case report provide takeaway lessons? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
|
|