Research Article
Analysis of the Most-Cited Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis in Acupuncture Research
Table 5
Distribution by year of publication of the 100 most-cited studies.
| Year | Number of study | Total citation | Average citation |
| 1989 | 1 | 106 | 106 | 1996 | 1 | 202 | 202 | 1997 | 1 | 120 | 120 | 1998 | 3 | 672 | 224 | 1999 | 5 | 724 | 145 | 2000 | 2 | 440 | 220 | 2001 | 5 | 729 | 146 | 2002 | 2 | 170 | 85 | 2003 | 4 | 694 | 174 | 2004 | 2 | 339 | 170 | 2005 | 8 | 1,365 | 171 | 2006 | 7 | 688 | 103 | 2007 | 6 | 772 | 129 | 2008 | 8 | 960 | 120 | 2009 | 9 | 1,221 | 136 | 2010 | 9 | 968 | 108 | 2011 | 2 | 182 | 91 | 2012 | 7 | 1,340 | 192 | 2013 | 8 | 795 | 99 | 2014 | 2 | 288 | 144 | 2015 | 4 | 312 | 78 | 2016 | 2 | 160 | 80 | 2017 | 1 | 66 | 66 | 2018 | 1 | 146 | 146 |
|
|