Review Article

Efficacy and Safety of Guizhi Decoction AssociatedFormulas for Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Summary of findings.

InterventionOutcomeNo. of trialsParticipants (E: male/female)/(C: male/female)Effect size (RR)95% CI value Of effect sizeI2 value

GZDAF vs. WMRecovery rate5(154/109)/(138/99)1.671.34 to 2.08<0.010%
Accumulative marked effective rate9(269/192)/(247/183)1.731.47 to 2.020%
Accumulative marked rate1.201.13 to 1.2728%
Recurrence rate (3 months)4(125/110)/(83/72)0.140.04 to 0.4730%
Recurrence rate (6 months)0.200.10 to 0.4434%
Cases of main symptoms disappearance (subgroup 1)1(18/14)/(20/12)1.441.02 to 2.050.05NA
Cases of main symptoms disappearance (subgroup 2)1(21/19)/(25/15)2.751.68 to 4.51<0.01NA

GZDAF + WM vs. WMRecovery rate2A∗1.260.94 to 1.680.130%
Accumulative marked effective rate4B∗1.130.96 to 1.33
Accumulative marked rate1.221.13 to 1.32<0.01

GZDAF + ABT vs. WMRecovery rate1(52/48)/(27/23)1.481.03 to 2.120.03NA
Accumulative marked effective rate (subgroup 1)1(15/15)/(14/16)0.60.25 to 1.440.25NA
Accumulative marked effective rate (subgroup 2)1(20/20)/(21/19)1.671.05 to 2.660.03NA
Accumulative marked rate (subgroup 1)2(35/35)/(35/35)1.050.94 to 1.170.380%
Accumulative marked rate (subgroup 2)1(20/20)/(21/19)1.411.12 to 1.77<0.01NA

GZDAF vs. GZDAF + TCMETRecovery rate2(67/95)/(60/82)0.780.61 to 0.990.040%
Accumulative marked rate (subgroup 1)1(43/77)/(38/62)0.770.66 to 0.89<0.01NA
Accumulative marked rate (subgroup 2)1(24/18)/(22/20)0.880.77 to 10.05NA

E: experimental group; C: control group; GZDAF: Guizhi Decoction associated formulas; WM: Western medicine; ABT: acupoint-based therapy; TCMET: TCM external therapy; NA: not applicable; A∗: 61 for male (E and C)/53 for female (E and C) in Deng 2011, and (33/34)/(31/26) in Zhang 2017; B∗: 61 for male (E and C)/53 for female (E and C) in Deng 2011, 72 for male (E and C)/62 for female (E and C) in Luo 2016, and (59/38)/(54/53) in Zhang 2017 + Zhu 2015.