Research Article

Anti-Inflammatory Investigations of Extracts of Zanthoxylum rhetsa

Table 1

Inhibitory effect and IC50 values of LPS-induced nitric oxide (NO) production in RAW264.7 macrophages of various Zanthoxylum rhetsa extracts.

Part of plantExtract and positive controlCodePercentage of inhibition at various concentrationsIC50 (μg/ml)
100 μg/ml50 μg/ml10 μg/ml1 μg/ml0.10 μg/ml0.01 μg/ml

PericarpHexanePH97.15 ± 0.37†38.47 ± 8.69−11.70 ± 3.94−12.38 ± 3.6111.99 ± 1.66,a
95% ethanolP9597.66 ± 1.12†24.46 ± 2.71−15.60 ± 3.58−15.65 ± 2.2715.33 ± 1.05,a
50% ethanolP5072.96 ± 1.0435.78 ± 1.833.10 ± 2.50−1.68 ± 4.2567.55 ± 2.22
Essential oilPO47.75 ± 6.0715.29 ± 3.43−14.02 ± 1.79−15.51 ± 2.41>100
WaterPW16.23 ± 4.258.75 ± 1.53>100

FruitHexaneFH91.55 ± 3.04†60.95 ± 0.848.69 ± 3.68−5.20 ± 4.0039.81 ± 0.53,c
95% ethanolF9593.36 ± 3.23†72.35 ± 4.5311.88 ± 1.01−14.05 ± 6.3629.42 ± 3.05,b
50% ethanolF5082.62 ± 1.26†48.32 ± 0.514.02 ± 1.80−2.95 ± 0.8751.63 ± 0.43
Essential oilFO42.23 ± 10.4815.29 ± 7.11−13.02 ± 3.56−11.27 ± 3.42>100
WaterFW20.97 ± 2.368.77 ± 1.86>100

SeedHexaneSH45.92 ± 1.9122.75 ± 1.03−1.17 ± 5.23−11.93 ± 8.02>100
95% ethanolS9562.56 ± 0.9835.63 ± 1.362.52 ± 7.24−3.69 ± 8.1773.10 ± 1.55
50% ethanolS5081.94 ± 2.79†46.88 ± 1.105.86 ± 3.64−10.45 ± 2.5854.36 ± 1.21
Essential oilSO76.57 ± 1.9135.40 ± 3.07−6.95 ± 2.64−13.79 ± 2.9565.34 ± 3.18
WaterSW18.83 ± 4.0610.88 ± 3.05>100
PrednisolonePred96.82 ± 0.34†89.32 ± 0.3181.49 ± 6.9872.90 ± 2.265.16 ± 1.250.07 ± 0.001 (0.19 ± 0.001 μM)

The results are shown as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) (n = 3). LPS: lipopolysaccharide; IC50: the half maximal inhibitory concentration. †: the %inhibition was not different significantly from prednisolone; value < 0.01, value < 0.001 compared with prednisolone as a positive control; anot significantly different between PH and P95; bsignificantly different ( value < 0.01) between PH, P95, and F95; csignificantly different ( value < 0.05) between F95 and FH; (–) not tested.