Review Article

Therapeutic Potential of Phytoconstituents in Management of Alzheimer’s Disease

Table 1

Neurological hypothesis and effect of phytoconstituents in AD.

Types of hypothesisClassNatural compoundsPharmacological/mechanism of actionReferences

Secretase hypothesisNeuronal cells and cell-free systemMyricetinReduced the generation of Aβ[11]
It also decreased the production of Aβ via upregulation of the α-secretase actions and/or downregulation of β-secretase actions[12]
Tannic acidPrevention of cognitive decline, inhibition of the activity of β-secretase, and reduction of the AD-like pathology in transgenic mice[13]
Aβ aggregationBiflavonoidsTaiwaniaflavone and monoflavonoid apigeninObserved that the biflavonoid was more effective at decreasing the extension of Aβ fibril[14]
Nontoxic Aβ oligomersOligomersSmall molecules of flavonoidsSoluble Aβ oligomers are the main toxic species of Aβ triggering neurodegeneration; Aβ oligomers over monomeric fibrillary Aβ are started as active therapeutics for nullifying and pointing Aβ toxicity in case of AD[1517]
Aβ-induced neurotoxicityPolyphenols and flavonoidsQuercetinInhibiting the formation of Aβ fibril, quercetin was less effective in terms of improving the toxicity of Aβ as compared to myricetin[18]
Tau hyperphosphorylationGlycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3β)LinarinPrevents the neurotoxicity induced by Aβ (25–35) via PI3K/Akt activation, which can subsequently lead to promotion of Bcl-2 regulation and inhibition of GSK-3β. It plays a key role in neuroprotection and AChE inhibition[19]
Oxidative stressBiflavonoidMorelloflavonePotential to act as a potent inhibitor of lipid peroxidation[20]
Natural flavonoidSilybum marianumPromotes the viability of neuron upon hydrogen peroxide insult[21, 22]
RAGEPolyphenolsCamellia sinensisRAGE plays a role as inducer of oxidative stress (OS) and AD pathophysiology[23, 24]