Review Article

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Seven Qi-Tonifying Chinese Medicine Injections for AECOPD Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Table 4

Pooled estimates of the network meta-analysis on PaO2 and PaCO2.

PaO2

PaCO2RT10.05 (6.02, 15.21)7.83 (3.57, 11.75)5.68 (2.50, 9.10)6.80 (4.10, 9.98)4.65 (−1.77, 11.10)5.89 (1.76, 9.83)
−1.76 (−5.80, 2.55)CKZ + RT−2.23 (−9.11, 3.21)−4.40 (−10.38, 0.80)−3.21 (−9.05, 1.77)−5.41 (−13.82, 1.92)−4.15 (−10.98, 1.24)
4.74 (−0.02, 9.68)6.51 (0.05, 12.80)HQ + RT−2.15 (−7.13, 3.38)−1.00 (−5.67, 4.41)−3.17 (−10.62, 4.63)−1.97 (−7.59, 3.84)
11.71 (3.77, 19.63)13.48 (4.34, 22.32)6.97 (−2.42, 16.21)KA + RT
4.22 (0.71, 7.75)5.98 (0.39, 11.31)−0.54 (−6.57, 5.39)−7.52 (−16.19,1.23)SF + RT1.17 (−3.20, 5.61)−1.01 (−8.40, 6.04)0.21 (−5.21, 5.15)
10.84 (6.05, 15.56)12.61 (6.10, 18.76)6.10 (−0.81, 12.75)−0.88 (−10.11, 8.38)6.62 (0.66, 12.52)SGM + RT−2.20 (−9.41, 4.70)−0.90 (−6.24, 3.74)
3.76 (−4.37, 11.98)5.52 (−3.73, 14.59)−1.00 (−10.57, 8.51)−7.95 (−19.34, 3.43)−0.45 (−9.37, 8.46)−7.09 (−16.50, 2.41)SM + RT1.22 (−6.42, 8.68)
8.70 (2.79, 14.68)10.46 (3.07, 17.61)3.96 (−3.76 11.61)−3.01 (−12.97, 6.98)4.49 (−2.44, 11.43)−2.14 (−9.71, 5.54)4.94 (−5.17, 15.08)SQFZ + RT

Values in bold indicate statistical difference.