Research Article
Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Acupressure on Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Table 1
Characteristics of the included studies.
| Study | Sample size (T/C) | Age (years; SD) (T/C) | Intervention (T/C) | Frequency | Treatment duration | Follow-up interval | Outcome |
| Hsieh et al. 2004 [18] | 69/77 | 47.6 ± 13.6/47.6 ± 14.9 | A/PT | Unclear | 1 month | 6 months | ②⑥⑧ | Hsieh et al. 2006 [19] | 64/65 | 50.2 ± 13.8/52.6 ± 17.2 | A/PT | Unclear | 1 month | 6 months | ③⑥ | Zhang et al. 2017 [26] | 30/30 | 18 to 55 | A/PT | QD | 1 month | NM | ①⑤⑥ | Wen 2015 [28] | 64/59 | 52.72 ± 9.27/49.09 ± 14.31 | A/TM | QW | 5 weeks | NM | ①⑥ | Zheng et al. 2012 [33] | 90/90 | 45.6/46.2 | A/TM | QD 5 times/week | 20 days | 1 year | ①⑤⑥ | Lu et al. 2004 [38] | 54/50 | 47.0 ± 10.41/45.0 ± 11.01 | A/TM | QD | 20 days | NM | ①⑥ | Wang 2010 [36] | 44/40 | 43.5 ± 10.5/42.8 ± 9.7 | A/TM | QD | 10 days | NM | ① | Liao et al. 2018 [23] | 100/100 | 38.26 ± 7.65/38.37 ± 7.35 | A/TM | QD | 2 weeks | NM | ①⑩ | Zhang et al. 2018 [20] | 42/42 | 43.63 ± 3.23/42.95 ± 3.54 | A/TM | QD | 1 month | NM | ①⑪ | Zhang 2010 [34] | 131/130 | 43.36 ± 11.43/41.84 ± 11.62 | A/TM | QD | 20 days | NM | ①⑥ | Huo 2009 [37] | 25/25 | 48.5/47.7 | A + EA/EA | QOD | 24 days | NM | ①⑥ | Liu and Guo 2014 [30] | 30/30 | 44.15/46.23 | A + EA/EA | QD 5 times/week | 2 weeks | NM | ①⑤ | Hu 2015 [29] | 40/40 | 40.2 ± 3.8/39.6 ± 3.5 | A + EA/EA | QD | 2 weeks | NM | ① | Bei 2018 [25] | 40/40 | 27.73 ± 3.51/28.16 ± 3.49 | A + EA/EA | QD 5 times/week | 2 weeks | NM | ①⑥ | Zhang and Zhao 2018 [21] | 60/60 | 48.55 ± 10.28/48.58 ± 10.26 | A + EA/EA | QD 6 times/week | 3 weeks | NM | ①⑤⑥ | Hua et al. 2014 [31] | 30/30 | 39.53 ± 9.66/41.93 ± 9.71 | A + EA/EA | QOD | 10 days | NM | ⑥ | Su 2013 [32] | 30/39 | 52.87 ± 8.86/48.86 ± 11.24 | A + EA/EA | QD 6 times/week | 2 weeks | NM | ①④⑧ | Tan 2017 [27] | 60/60 | 49.3 ± 8.5/50.1 ± 7.9 | A + MA/MA | QD | 20 days | NM | ①④⑥ | Hua and Wang 2018 [24] | 30/30 | 43.6 ± 10.4/40.9 ± 9.7 | A + MA/MA | QOD | 10 days | NM | ⑤⑥ | Zeng and Pei 2018 [22] | 45/45 | 38.05 ± 6.21/37.56 ± 5.68 | A + MA/MA | QD 6 times/week | 2 weeks | NM | ①⑤⑥ | Lin 2010 [35] | 30/30 | 43.9 ± 9.922/44.6 ± 8.315 | A + MA/MA | QOD | 10 days | NM | ①⑤ | Kobayashi et al. 2019 [17] | 27/24 | 67.4 ± 12.2/68.3 ± 15 | A/UC | QW | 1 month | 1 month | ③④⑥⑧ | Chen 2015 [8] | 65/64 | 18.75 ± 1.74/18.73 ± 0.63 | A/UC | BID | 1 week | 4 months | ④⑥ |
|
|
Note: (1). A: acupressure; PT: physical therapy; TM: tuina massage; EA: electro-acupuncture; MA: manual acupuncture; UC: usual care. (2). Outcome indicator: ① response rate; ② Short-Form Pain Questionnaires; ③ Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire; ④ Oswestry Disability Index; ⑤ Japanese Orthopedic Association Score; ⑥ Visual Analogue Scale; ⑦ Fatigue Severity Scale; ⑧ Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire; TCM Syndrome Index; ⑨ straight leg raise; ⑩ functional independence measurement; (3). BID: twice a day; QD: once a day; QOD: once every other day; QW: once a week; NM: not mentioned.
|