Research Article

Phytochemical Analysis, Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Anti-Swarming Properties of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. Calyx Extracts: In Vitro and In Silico Modelling Approaches

Table 3

Determination of MICs, MBCs, and MBC/MIC ratio of H. sabdariffa methanolic and aqueous extracts compared with amphotericin and ampicillin.

H. sabdariffa aqueous extractH. sabdariffa methanolic extractAmpicillin
IZMICMBCMBC/MIC ratioIZMICMBCMBC/MIC ratioIZMICMBC

S. aureus ATCC 2592318 ± 0a2.3429.375417 ± 1a2.3424.68226.66 ± 1.15 b0.250.40
S. epidermidis CIP 10651019 ± 2b2.3429.375415.33 ± 0.57a2.3424.68222.67 ± 0.57c0.250.40
E. coli ATCC 3521817 ± 1b2.3429.375415 ± 1b2.3429.375411.67 ± 1.52a0.0233
L. monocytogenes ATCC 1911521 ± 1c9.37518.75216.66 ± 0.57b2.3429.375412.33 ± 0.57a0.0230.093
E. faecalis ATCC 2921219.33 ± 0.57c9.37537.5418 ± 0b2.3429.375413.66 ± 0.57a0.0230.093
S. typhimurium ATCC 140818 ± 0a9.375>75>417 ± 2a2.3429.375417.33 ± 1.15a0.0230.093
B. cereus ATCC 1177820 ± 2a9.37518.75219.33 ± 0.57a2.3429.375426.33 ± 1.52b0.250.40
V. parahaemolyticus ATCC 1780217.33 ± 0.57b9.37537.5417.33 ± 0.57b2.3429.375413.33 ± 0.57a0.0113
P. aeruginosa ATCC 2785316 ± 2a9.37518.75218.33 ± 1.52a2.3429.375422.66 ± 0.57b0.0111.5

YeastsIZMICMFCMFC/MIC ratioIZMICMFCMFC/MIC ratioAmphotericin B
IZMICMFC

Candida albicans ATCC 201915 ± 1a9.37537.5414.33 ± 0.57a9.37537.5414.66 ± 0.57a0.0240.781
Candida parapsilosis ATCC 2201914 ± 1b9.37537.5415 ± 1b9.37537.5410.33 ± 0.57a0.1950.39
Candida krusei ATCC 625817.66 ± 1.52b9.37537.5410 ± 1a9.37518.75212 ± 0 a0.0970.195
Candida tropicalis ATCC 06-08517 ± 1c9.37537.5415 ± 1b9.37537.546 ± 0a0.390.25

The diameter of the disc is 6 mm. The letters (a–c) indicate a significant difference between the different inhibition zones according to the Duncan test (). MIC: minimal inhibitory concentration expressed as mg/ml; MBC: minimal bactericidal concentration expressed as mg/ml; MFC: minimal fungicidal concentration expressed as mg/ml.