Research Article

Preclinical Rodent Models of Arthritis and Acute Inflammation Indicate Immunomodulatory and Anti-Inflammatory Properties of Juglans regia Extracts

Table 3

Effects of J. regia extracts on inflammation using carrageenan-, histamine-, dextran-, and serotonin-induced paw edema models.

Groups1st h2nd h3rd h4th h5th h1st h2nd h3rd h

Carrageenan-induced paw edema, mean ± SEM (% inhibition)Histamine-induced paw edema, mean ± SEM (% inhibition)
Control0.281 ± 0.0030.298 ± 0.0040.313 ± 0.0060.335  ± 0.0050.352 ± 0.0070.299 ± 0.0020.319 ± 0.0030.333 ± 0.006
EEJR0.210 ± 0.003 (25.26)0.195 ± 0.002 (34.56)0.172 ± 0.003 (45.04)0.156 ± 0.004 (53.43)0.125 ± 0.003 (64.48)0.235 ± 0.002 (21.40)0.220 ± 0.003 (31.03)0.186 ± 0.004 (44.14)
NHJR0.235 ± 0.002 (16.37)0.218 ± 0.003 (26.84)0.206 ± 0.003 (34.18)0.193 ± 0.003 (42.38)0.175 ± 0.003 (50.28)0.251 ± 0.003 (16.05)0.240 ± 0.002 (24.76)0.225 ± 0.008 (32.43)
Piroxicam /Indo0.211 ± 0.006 (24.91)0.210 ± 0.003 (29.53)0.207 ± 0.002 (33.86)0.189 ± 0.002 (43.58)0.169 ± 0.001 (51.98)0.232 ± 0.002 (22.40)0.225 ± 0.003 (29.46)0.218 ± 0.005 (34.53)

Dextran-induced paw edema, mean±SEM (% inhibition)Serotonin-induced paw edema, mean±SEM (% inhibition)
Control0.310 ± 0.0040.320 ± 0.0020.340 ± 0.0040.349 ± 0.0030.358 ± 0.0050.315 ± 0.0020.335 ± 0.0070.345 ± 0.003
EEJR0.216 ± 0.004 (30.32)0.206 ± 0.004 (35.62)0.193 ± 0.004 (43.23)0.175 ± 0.002 (49.27)0.173 ± 0.004 (51.67)0.236 ± 0.005 (25.07)0.223 ± 0.004 (33.43)0.206 ± 0.003 (40.28)
NHJR0.238 ± 0.006 (23.22)0.225 ± 0.002 (29.68)0.205 ± 0.006 (39.70)0.193 ± 0.004 (44.69)0.183 ± 0.009 (48.88)0.258 ± 0.004 (18.09)0.236 ± 0.004 (29.55)0.225 ± 0.005 (34.78)
DPH/Indo0.212 ± 0.006 (31.61)0.199 ± 0.003 (37.81)0.179 ± 0.002 (47.35)0.170 ± 0.002 (51.28)0.165 ± 0.007 (53.91)0.240 ± 0.004 (23.80)0.238 ± 0.004 (28.95)0.200 ± 0.002 (42.02)

EEJR, ethanolic extract of J. regia (500 mg/kg); NHJR, n-hexane extract of J. regia (500 mg/kg); piroxicam and indomethacin (10 mg/kg, each); DPH, diphenhydramine (60 mg/kg). Significant reduction in edema was observed with these extracts in all models. Values were denoted as mean ± SEM. indicates comparison with the control group.