A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study

<div>Histopathological and histomorphometric analysis of the tissues corresponding to the two grafts used (H and E). (a) Graft 1 (biomaterial group): regular-shaped trabeculae of woven bone (arrow) in a scarce fibrous stroma (asterisk). (b) Graft 2 (biomaterial group): fine trabeculae of bone tissue (arrow) within paucicellular fibrous connective tissue (asterisk) (hematoxylin-eosin staining 100x).</div>

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

fig1

Figure 1

Figure 1: A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study 

Figure 1 | A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study 