A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study

<div>New bone formation comparing the two grafts (histological analysis—H and E). 40x magnification of the histopathological graft 1 biomaterial (a, c) and graft 2 (b, d). <i>Note.</i> The greater amount of neoformed bone tissue (arrow) with the use of graft 1 when compared to graft 2 (hematoxylin-eosin staining).</div>

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

fig2

Figure 2

Figure 2: A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study 

Figure 2 | A Comparative Histomorphometric Analysis of Two Biomaterials for Maxillary Sinus Augmentation: A Randomized Clinical, Crossover, and Split-Mouth Study 