Review Article

Medicine Insufficient Evidence for the Efficacy of Massage as Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review

Table 1

Characteristics of the included studies.

StudyParticipantsInterventionComparatorOutcome measuresMajor findings

Silva et al. (2007) [27]N = 15 (M = 13, F = 2), 3∼6 years oldEG: (N = 8) Qigong massage + State of Oregon’s special education program,
duration 5 months of treatment twice a week for two five-week periods, with five weeks in between,
twice a week for 5 weeks (by a specialist), every day for 5 months (by a parent) 15 min/d
CG: (N = 7) state of Oregon’s special education Program(1) Batelle: the cognitive domain screening test,
(2) Sensory profile evaluation tool,
(3) Vineland adaptive behavior scales,
(4) ABC
(5) Parent questionnaire
(1) Compared with CG, significant improvement in the sensory profile score, sensory processing score, sensory modulation score, social skills, and the basic living skills score in EG was observed, and
autism behavior decreased in both groups
(2) No statistical difference was observed between motor and language development.
Improvement in bowel and sleep abnormalities in EG was observed

Silva et al. (2009) [28]N = 46 (M = 37, F = 9), 3∼6 years oldRCT EG: (N = 25) Qigong massage plus special education program
once a week (by a therapist) and everyday for 5 months (by a parent)
15 min/d
CG: (N = 21) special education program(1) PDDBI teacher and parent versions,
(2) ABC, and
(3) SSC
(1) Compared with CG, significant main intervention effects were found in the ABC and the PDDBI social/communication composite. Significant main intervention effects were found in parent maladaptive behavior composite and PDDBI social/Communication composite
(2) No significant treatment effect was found on the PDDBI measure of maladaptive classroom behavior between the two groups as both were being improved
(3) Sense and self-regulation impairment (SSC and PDDBI sensory) and the three composite scores of the PDDBI (the maladaptive behavior composite, social/communication composite, and the total autism composite) were highly related
Silva et al. (2011) [29]N = 47 (M = 33, F = 14),
3∼6 years old
RCT
EG: (N = 28) trained parent Qigong massage plus special education program
everyday for 5 months
(by a parent)
15 min/d
CG: special education program (N = 19)(1) ABC,
(2) PDDBI,
(3) APSI, and
(4) SSC
Compared with CG, significant intervention effects were found for the PDDBI, the SSC, and the APSI. The main effect was found in the interaction between treatment and severity of sensory and self-regulation impairment on the PDDBI scales
Silva et al. (2015) [30]N = 84 (M = 75, F = 9),
3∼6 years old
RCT
EG: (N = 42) Qigong massage plus special education program
once a week (by a therapist) and everyday (by a parent)
15 min/d
RCT
CG: (N = 42)
special education program
(1) CARS-2edition,
(2) PLS-5edition,
(3) Vineland-II,
(4) ABC,
(5) SSC,
(6) APSI, and
(7) The beach center family-professional partnership scale
Compared with CG, significant improvement in normalization of receptive language, autistic behavior, total sensory abnormalities, tactile abnormalities, and decreased autism severity was observed.
Parents reported improved child-to-parent interactions, bonding, and significant decreased parenting stress

Liu et al. (2017) [31]N = 60
(M = 50, F = 10)
2–8 years old
EG: (N = 30) acupuncture plus Tui na (by a specialist),
acupuncture for 1 hour, 2 times a week for 30 times; Tui na, 2 times a week for30 times
CG:(N = 30)
acupuncture
(by a specialist)
(1) ABC(1) Compared with CG, significant improvement in the ABC total scores in both groups before and after treatment was observed, and the EG group showed an increased difference in the ABC total scores
(2) EG: significant improvement in four of the ABC scale dimensions (sensation, communication, physical movement, and self-care ability) except language was observed
(3) CG: the ABC scale showed significant improvement in other dimensions except for sensation

Jing et al. (2019) [32]N = 136
M = 109, F = 27
age:4.42 ± 0.19
RCT
EG:(N = 68)Tui na plus acupuncture (by a specialist)
2 section/week, 15 weeks
CG: (N = 68)
acupuncture
(by a specialist)
2 section/week, 15 weeks
(1) ABC subset self-help(1) After the intervention, the self-help score in both groups decreased, and EG was significantly better than that of CG
(2) The effective rate of the EG (100%) was higher than that of CG (96.43%) but showed no significant difference

Feng et al. (2020) [33]N = 44 (M = 33, F = 11), age:3.57 ± 0.84RCT
EG: (N = 22) behavioral intervention plus traditional Chinese massage
(by a specialist)
1 section/day, 5 section/week, 6 weeks.
CG: (N = 22)
behavioral intervention
(by a specialist)
(1) ABC
(2) CARS
After the intervention, the ABC and CARS score in both groups decreased, and EG was significantly better than CG

Wu et al. 2020 [34]N = 120
(M = 57, F = 63)
Age: 2.69 ± 0.22
RCT
EG: (N = 60)Tui na plus acupuncture (by a specialist)
2 section/day, 30 mins
CG: (N = 60)
Acupuncture
(by a specialist)
(1) Language ability (self-designed questionnaire)
(2) SAS,
(3) SDS
4. Parents’ treatment satisfaction
(1) EG language recovery level and language training effect were significantly higher than that of the control group
(2) The scores of anxiety and depression in EG were lower than those of the CG ()
(3) The treatment satisfaction of EG was higher than that of CG (0 < 0.05)