Research of the Distribution of Tongue Features of Diabetic Population Based on Unsupervised Learning Technology
Table 5
Laboratory results (SOM).
Item
Cluster 1 (n = 121)
Cluster 2 (n = 195)
Cluster 3 (n = 201)
Cluster 4 (n = 81)
Gender (n, %)
82 (68)
99 (51)
112 (56)
49 (60)
Age (years)
56 (48, 62)
61 (54, 65)
57 (50, 63)▲
54 (46, 61)□□□
GLU (mmol/L)
7.565 (6.360, 9.250)
6.900 (5.585, 8.100)
7.200 (6.330, 8.240)
7.810 (6.300, 9.670)□□
(n = 120)
(n = 195)
(n = 201)
(n = 81)
TCHO (mmol/L)
5.376 ± 1.128
5.061 ± 1.022
5.296 ± 1.084
5.384 ± 1.098
(n = 114)
(n = 189)
(n = 192)
(n = 76)
TG (mmol/L)
1.935 (1.397, 2.860)
1.610 (1.200, 2.420)
1.745 (1.240, 2.433)
1.975 (1.488, 2.832)
(n = 114)
(n = 189)
(n = 192)
(n = 76)
LDL (mmol/L)
2.960 (2.230, 3.580)
2.790 (2.210, 3.370)
2.940 (2.335, 3.570)
2.990 (2.310, 3.705)
(n = 95)
(n = 167)
(n = 164)
(n = 67)
HDL (mmol/L)
1.190 (1.025, 1.365)
1.230 (1.020, 1.440)
1.180 (1.048, 1.450)
1.110 (1.025, 1.325)
(n = 95)
(n = 167)
(n = 164)
(n = 67)
UA (umol/L)
345.(294, 419)
337 (292, 401)
340 (287, 412)
326 (253, 422)
(n = 120)
(n = 195)
(n = 201)
(n = 81)
ALT (U/L)
25 (17, 38)
23 (16, 36)
23 (16, 40)
24 (15, 35)
(n = 120)
(n = 195)
(n = 201)
(n = 81)
AST (U/L)
21 (18, 29)
21 (18, 28)
21 (17, 30)
20 (17, 29)
(n = 119)
(n = 191)
(n = 198)
(n = 80)
GGT (U/L)
36 (24, 53)
31 (21, 44)
31 (21, 53)
37 (24, 57)
(n = 115)
(n = 182)
(n = 195)
(n = 81)
TBIL (umol/L)
13 (11, 17)
12 (9, 16)
12 (9, 16)
13 (9, 17)
(n = 104)
(n = 161)
(n = 173)
(n = 70)
CREA (umol/L)
72 (61, 80)
70 (59, 81)
68 (56, 79)
71 (57, 80)
(n = 120)
(n = 195)
(n = 201)
(n = 81)
BUN (mmol/L)
5.295 (4.470, 6.455)
5.120 (4.518, 5.975)
5.100 (4.415, 6.000)
5.000 (4.450, 6.100)
(n = 120)
(n = 194)
(n = 199)
(n = 81)
eGFR (ml/min1.73 m^2)
104 (93, 117)
102 (87, 117)
107 (91, 122)
103 (92, 115)
(n = 99)
(n = 155)
(n = 170)
(n = 68)
denotes the comparison of Cluster 1 and Cluster 2, ,, and .▲ denotes the comparison of Cluster 2 and Cluster 3, ▲,▲▲, and ▲▲▲.□ denotes the comparison of Cluster 2 and Cluster 4, □,□□, and □□□.
