The Efficacy and Safety of Dingkun Pill in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Jin, Bao; Zhang, Yang; Zhang, Zongyu; Yang, Guorong; Pan, Yujia; Xie, Liangzhen; Liu, Jiarui; Shen, Wenjuan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8698755

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Reproductive Endocrine Diseases 2021

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 8698755 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/8698755

The Efficacy and Safety of Dingkun Pill in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Bao Jin,¹Yang Zhang,²Zongyu Zhang,¹Guorong Yang,¹Yujia Pan,¹Liangzhen Xie,³Jiarui Liu,⁴and Wenjuan Shen⁵

Academic Editor: Yong Wang

Received22 Apr 2022

Accepted04 Jul 2022

Published24 Aug 2022

Abstract

Objective. Dingkun Pill (DKP) is a proprietary Chinese medicine that has been utilized for patients with gynecological diseases, and its clinical application has been widely accepted in China. However, the effects of DKP on reproduction and metabolism in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) have never been systematically evaluated. Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DKP in treating reproductive and metabolic abnormalities with PCOS. Methods. We searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and Chinese Biomedical Literature Database up until January 2022 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The methodological quality of the included RCTs was estimated using the Cochrane collaboration risk-of-bias instrument, and the meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. Results. A total of 22 RCTs (including 1994 participants) were identified. DKP, combined with ovulation-inducing drugs (OID) or combined oral contraceptives (COC) was superior to OID or COC alone in improving the pregnancy rate (relative risk (RR) 1.84, 95% CI 1.62 to 2.11 and RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.64, respectively), ovulation rate (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.84 and RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.37, respectively), endometrial thickness (weighted mean difference (WMD) 2.50, 95% CI 1.91 to 3.09 and WMD 0.62, 95% CI 0.08 to 1.16, respectively), luteinizing hormone (WMD −1.93, 95% CI −2.80 to−.07 and WMD −1.79, 95% CI −2.66 to−0.92, respectively), and testosterone (standardized mean difference (SMD) −2.12, 95% CI −3.01 to−1.24 and SMD −1.21, 95% CI −1.64 to−0.78, respectively). DKP combined with COC led to a greater improvement in homeostasis model assessment-β (WMD 20.42, 95% CI 16.85 to 23.98) when compared with COC alone. There was a significant difference between DKP and COC in terms of decreasing total cholesterol (WMD −0.37, 95% CI −0.72 to−0.02), triacylglycerol (WMD −0.85, 95% CI −1.50 to−0.20), and free fatty acid (WMD −130.00, 95% CI −217.56 to−42.22). However, DKP did not affect the follicle stimulating hormone, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Adverse reactions were more common in COC alone compared to DKP and COC in combination (RR 0.22, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.63). Conclusion. DKP shows promise in modifying reproductive and metabolic parameters in patients with PCOS and may be used as a primary choice in conventional or complementary therapies for PCOS. The quality of the evidence analyzed was suboptimal, and therefore, our results should be interpreted cautiously. More prospective large-scale and well-designed RCTs, as well as longer intervention durations are required in the future to draw more reliable conclusions.

1. Introduction

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a common gynecologic endocrine disorder that is generally considered to be the leading cause of anovulatory infertility [1], and it affects 6% to 20% of reproductive-age women [2]. PCOS is characterized by menstrual dysfunction, hypo-ovulation/anovulation, hyperandrogenism, and polycystic ovaries [3]. In addition to reproductive disruption, women with PCOS are prone to metabolic disorders, including insulin resistance (IR), impaired glucose tolerance, and dyslipidemia, and they are at an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus [4]. In the U.S. alone, the cost of diagnosing, treating, and caring for patients with PCOS was estimated to be $8 billion yearly in 2020, which places an immense financial burden on both the patient’s family and society as a whole [5]. Therefore, the effective management and treatment of PCOS can contribute to improving public health.

Western medicine management for PCOS includes ovulation-inducing drugs (OID), insulin sensitizers, combined oral contraceptives (COC), antiandrogens, and/or antiobesity medications aiming at restoring menstruation and improving pregnancy, decreasing androgen levels, lowering IR, and reducing weight [6]. However, they have some potential side effects. Although clomiphene citrate achieves an ovulation rate up to 70% to 80%, the clinical pregnancy rate is only 30% to 40%, and patients are at risk of multiple pregnancies [7]. Letrozole has a short half-life (42 h) and is quickly excreted from the body, thus resulting in the inability to form a dominant follicle [8]. Patients taking Diane-35 or metformin may suffer from abnormal uterine bleeding, gastrointestinal disturbances, and other adverse reactions [9]. Thus, an increasing number of PCOS patients have turned to complementary and alternative therapy to improve their health. According to a recent survey, 70.4% of obstetricians and gynecologists/reproductive doctors in China use traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of PCOS [10].

Dingkun Pill (DKP) is a traditional Chinese patent herbal medicine originating from the Golden Mirror of Medicine written by Wu Qian in the Qing Dynasty and is officially listed in the Chinese Pharmacopoeia [11]. It is composed of 30 Chinese herbals and animal products, including red ginseng (Radix Ginseng Rubra), pilose antler (Cornu Cervi Pantotrichum), saffron (Stigma Croci), debarked peony root (Radix Paeoniae Alba), Chinese angelica (Radix Angelicae Sinensis), prepared rehmannia root (Radix Rehmanniae Preparata), ass hide glue (Colla Corii Asini), etc. For centuries, DKP has been used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat gynecological diseases because the combination of these ingredients is thought to nourish the liver and kidney, regulate menstruation, relieve Qi stagnation, benefit Qi, and nourish the blood. Among the traditional Chinese patent herbal medicine used for PCOS, DKP ranks first [10], and an increasing number of animal experiments and clinical studies have demonstrated the reliable efficacy of DKP [12–15]. In experimental studies, DKP and its main active ingredients were found to regulate the reproductive hormone levels in rats with PCOS, decrease the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in the ovary, and increase the expression of homeobox gene A10 (HOXA10) in the uterus, thereby facilitating uterine receptivity [16, 17]. According to Gao’s study, the mechanism of DKP in the treatment of PCOS might be associated with multiple signaling pathways, such as the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway, serotonergic synapses, steroid hormone biosynthesis, and ovarian steroidogenesis, suggesting that DKP can treat PCOS through multiple targets [18]. Regarding the effect of DKP in PCOS, the available clinical data suggest that DKP plays a role in regulating the menstrual cycle, promoting ovulation, increasing the pregnancy rate, and enhancing the function of the hypothalamus-pituitary-ovary axis (HPOA) [19, 20]. Moreover, DKP has also been used in PCOS patients with IR and lipid metabolism abnormalities [21, 22]. As a traditional Chinese patent herbal medicine, DKP has the advantages of easy access, convenient administration, and wide acceptance. Hence, it has great potential for popularization. However, as far as we know, there has been no systematic evaluation of the efficacy and safety of DKP in the treatment of reproductive and metabolic abnormalities in women with PCOS and whether this medicine represents an ideal form of complementary and alternative therapy. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of available RCTs to provide a reliable basis for the treatment of PCOS.

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was conducted and reported according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines [23] and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022298220).

2.1. Search Strategy

The systematic literature search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, VIP Database, and the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM) from their inception to 1 January, 2022. Key words in the literature retrieval included “Dingkun pill,” “Dingkun Dan,” “polycystic ovary syndrome,” “polycystic ovarian syndrome,” “PCOS,” and related synonyms (the full details of the search strategy are given in Table S1 in the Supplementary Materials). No limits were applied to language or publication status. The references of significant studies were searched manually for possible relevant literature, and conference compilations supplemented the electronic searches.

2.2. Eligibility Criteria

The inclusion criteria was as follows: (a) subjects diagnosed with PCOS regardless of race and age, (b) the intervention group was treated with DKP or DKP combined with the control group's intervention. The control group was treated with Western medicine, placebo, or blank and with an unlimited dose and course of treatment. (c) The study was an RCT. The exclusion criterion was the literature in which relevant data could not be obtained and data were still not available after contacting the authors.

2.3. Outcome Measures

As improving reproduction is the core in treating PCOS, the primary outcome measure was defined as reproductive indexes, including pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, and endometrial thickness. The secondary outcome measures were defined as hormone parameters—including luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and testosterone (T)—metabolic indexes—including fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (FINS), and homeostasis model assessment-β (HOMA-β)—lipid profiles—including total cholesterol (TC), triacylglycerol (TG), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and free fatty acid (FFA)—and anthropometric indices—including body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-hip ratio (WHR). Adverse reactions were also included as outcomes.

2.4. Literature Screening and Data Extraction

Based on the search strategy presented above, the titles and abstracts of the identified articles were read for preliminary screening after eliminating duplicates. The full texts were then read during rescreening in accordance with the inclusion and exclusion criteria established previously to identify the included articles. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers, and disagreement was resolved by discussion. The following information was extracted from the included RCTs: (1) the characteristics of the articles, including primary author, publication year, language, and study design, (2) participants’ characteristics, including mean age, sample size, and criteria used to define PCOS, (3) the details of interventions and comparison methods, including the type and treatment duration, (4) every outcome measure, and (5) adverse reactions. To ensure that the data were complete and accurate, we contacted the authors via telephone or e-mail regarding missing data.

2.5. Quality Assessment

Two reviewers independently assessed the methodological quality of eligible RCTs using the Cochrane collaboration risk-of-bias instrument [24]. Factors were related to bias risk-included random sequence generation, allocation concealment, the blinding of participants and personnel, the blinding of outcome assessment, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other biases. There were three levels used to assess the methodological quality: the low risk of bias, the high risk of bias, and an unclear risk of bias. Then, we used the grading of recommendations, assessments, development, and evaluation (GRADE) [25] system (pro 3.6.1) to evaluate the quality of evidence derived from our systematic review for primary outcomes separately, including the risk of bias, indirectness, inconsistency, imprecision, and publication bias. All discrepancies and disagreements were resolved by consensus or by discussion with the corresponding author.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

All data syntheses were performed using the Review Manager software version 5.3. Dichotomous data were presented as the risk ratio (RR) and continuous data as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or standardized mean difference (SMD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity across the studies was tested by the Cochrane Q-test and I² statistic. If I² ≤ 50% and , a fixed effects model was used. Otherwise, a random effects model was used. To determine the stability of the meta-analysis results, a sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore heterogeneity because of extreme data. A funnel plot was used to assess publication biases.

3. Results

3.1. Study Selection

Originally, 185 articles were identified in the database through the search strategy, and it was reduced to 84 records after duplicates were removed. After reviewing the titles, abstracts, and full-text articles, a total of 22 RCTs in 24 publications [10, 19, 21, 22, 26–45], including 1994 women with PCOS, satisfied our inclusion criteria (Figure 1).

3.2. Characteristics of the Included Studies

The summarized characteristics of the 22 RCTs and the 1994 participants are shown in Table 1. All of the RCTs were conducted in China, with the sample size ranging from 60 to 210 participants, and most of them were 20 to 39 years old. Studies were published between 2012 and 2021. Most of the included RCTs used the Rotterdam criteria [46] to define PCOS, while three RCTs [36, 39, 41] used Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chinese Obstetrics and Gynecology Association, and Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of PCOS in China, respectively, and six RCTs [29, 31, 34, 35, 37, 40] only reported the diagnosis of PCOS and did not clearly describe the diagnostic criteria. The interventions were DKP alone or in combination with OID or COC, and the controls were OID or COC. Twenty of the 22 RCTs [19, 25–43] were 2-arm studies, and the remaining two RCTs were 3-arm studies. Data from the 3-arm study, divided into DKP vs. COC and DKP + COC vs. COC, were included in the meta-analysis. The duration of treatment was one month in two RCTs [33, 39], three months in 11 RCTs [10, 19, 21, 22, 28–30, 32, 40–44], six months in two RCTs [26, 38], and until pregnancy in the rest. Pregnancy rate and endometrial thickness were the most common outcomes followed by hormone parameters. Ten RCTs [10, 19, 21, 22, 26, 28, 33, 38, 39, 42–44] reported on adverse reactions.

3.3. Risk of Bias of Individual Studies

Figure 2 summarizes the risk of bias of the included trials based on different quality domains using the Cochrane collaboration instrument. Nine trials [10, 21, 22, 25, 29, 30, 33, 37, 41–43] reported random sequence generation using a random number table or software and thus had a low risk, 12 trials [19, 26–28, 31, 32, 34–36, 38–40] only mentioned “random” but were missing details regarding the randomization methods and thus had an unclear risk, and one trial [38] had a high risk. Only one trial [10, 21, 22] had a low risk when considering allocation concealment. In terms of the blinding of participants or personnel, two trials [10, 19, 21, 22] had a low risk. The outcome assessors were blind in one trial [10, 21, 22] using triple-blinding, and the other 21 trials had an unclear risk. There was no risk of bias for incomplete outcome data or for selective reporting. All trials appeared to have an unclear risk for other biases.

3.4. Findings from the Meta-Analysis

3.4.1. Effects on Reproductive Indexes

The effects of DKP on pregnancy rate was assessed in 18 RCTs (1616 participants). The pooled results showed that the combination of DKP + OID was superior to OID alone in increasing the pregnancy rate (RR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.62 to 2.11, ). Compared with the COC groups, there was a significant improvement in pregnancy rate in the DKP + COC groups (RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.16 to 1.64, ). However, a comparison of DKP with COC did not show a significant difference in pregnancy rate (RR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.38 to 1.76, ) (Figure 3).

In terms of ameliorating the ovulation rate, eight RCTs, including 769 participants, indicated that DKP plus OID or COC for PCOS was better than using OID or COC alone (OID: RR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.03 to 1.84, ; COC: RR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.11 to 1.37, ). There was no clear difference between DKP and COC in terms of ovulation rate (RR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.68 to 1.36, ) (Figure 4).

There were ten RCTs (772 participants) assessing the effects of DKP on endometrial thickness. Compared with OID alone, the combination DKP + OID significantly improved the endometrial thickness of PCOS patients (WMD: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.91 to 3.09, ). Furthermore, the combination of DKP + COC also significantly increased endometrial thickness (WMD: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.16, ) (Figure 5).

3.4.2. Effects on Hormone Parameters

Thirteen trials totaling 1175 women were used in a meta-analysis of the effects of DKP on LH level. Compared with OID alone, DKP + OID significantly decreased LH (WMD: −1.93, 95% CI: −2.80 to−1.07, ). Similarly, the combination of DKP and COC was superior in reducing LH compared to COC alone (WMD: −1.79, 95% CI: −2.66 to−0.92, ). There was no significant difference between DKP versus COC in reducing LH (WMD: 0.04, 95% CI: –0.29 to−0.37, ) (Figure 6).

Figure 7 shows the meta-analysis of FSH in 13 RCTs with a total of 1175 patients. DKP did not appear to have a significant effect on improving FSH because no statistically significant differences were seen: DKP + OID versus OID (WMD: −0.37, 95% CI: −0.92 to 0.18, ), DKP + COC versus COC (WMD: −0.24, 95% CI: −1.03 to 0.55, ), and DKP versus COC (WMD: 0.04, 95% CI: −0.53 to 0.61, ). However, a significant difference in the level of FSH was found in the subgroup analysis stratified by the duration of the intervention. In the stratified analysis, interventions lasting three months or more had a significant effect on FSH levels (WMD: −0.40, 95% CI: −0.68 to−0.12, ). The details of the subgroup analyses are shown in the Supplementary Materials.

A meta-analysis of 13 trials (1157 patients) found that T decreased more after DKP plus OID or COC treatment in comparison with OID or COC alone (OID: SMD: −2.12, 95% CI: −3.01 to−1.24, ; COC: SMD: −1.21, 95% CI: −1.64 to−0.78, ). On the contrary, the comparison of the DKP groups with the COC groups did not show a significant difference in T (SMD: 0.18, 95% CI: −0.26 to 0.62, ) (Figure 8).

3.4.3. Effects on Metabolic Indexes

The effects of DKP on FINS were assessed in 3 RCTs (372 patients). There was a significant decline in the FINS level after COC intake in comparison with DKP + COC treatment (WMD: 2.57, 95% CI: 2.22 to 2.91, ), while no significant difference was found between DKP and COC on FINS (WMD: −1.52, 95% CI: −6.53 to 3.49, ) (Figure 9).

One RCT reported FBG as an outcome measure and did not observe any significant change in FBG in PCOS patients after DKP treatment compared to COC treatment (WMD: 0.10, 95% CI: −0.09 to 0.29, ). In addition, compared with the COC group, there were no significant differences in FBG in the DKP + COC group (WMD: 0.10, 95% CI: −0.15 to 0.35, ) (Table 2).

When we combined data from two studies (297 patients), a significant increase in HOMA-β was observed in DKP + COC treatment (WMD: 20.42, 95% CI: 16.85 to 23.98, ) (Figure 10).

3.4.4. Effects on Lipid Profiles

As illustrated in Table 2, DKP in PCOS patients showed a significant reduction in serum TC (WMD: −0.37, 95% CI: −0.72 to−0.02, ), TG (WMD: –0.85, 95% CI: −1.50 to−0.20, ), and FFA (WMD: −130.00, 95% CI: −217.56 to−42.44, ) levels versus the COC group. However, COC improved the serum concentration of HDL-C compared to the DKP group (WMD: −0.35, 95% CI: −0.55 to−0.15, ). There was no significant change in TC (WMD: 0.18, 95% CI:−0.16 to 0.52, ), TG (WMD: −0.19, 95% CI: −1.02 to 0.64, ), LDL-C (WMD: 0.21, 95% CI: −0.11 to 0.53, ), HDL-C (WMD: −0.04, 95% CI: −0.29 to 0.21, ), or FFA (WMD: −67.00, 95% CI: −157.12 to 23.12, ) when DKP + COC was administered (Table 2).

3.4.5. Effects on Anthropometric Indices

BMI and WHR were measured in only one trial, and there were no significant changes in BMI or WHR for DKP alone (BMI: WMD: 0.70, 95% CI: −1.81 to 3.21, ; WHR: WMD: 0.00, 95% CI: −0.03 to 0.03, ) or for DKP + COC (BMI: WMD: 0.60, 95% CI: −1.92 to 3.12, ; WHR: WMD: −0.01, 95% CI: –0.04 to 0.02, ) (Table 2).

3.5. Adverse Reactions

Ten trials [10, 19, 21, 22, 27, 29, 34, 39, 40, 43–45] recorded adverse events, of which eight trials reported that there were no adverse reactions. In the other two studies [43, 44], statistical analysis showed that DKP + COC was associated with fewer adverse events compared to COC alone (RR = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.63, ) (Figure 11). The results of Chen et al. [43] showed that adverse reactions occurred in the intervention group (mild nausea in 1 case and mild breast pain in 1 case) and the control group (mild nausea in 3 cases, mild breast pain in 2 cases, interphase hemorrhage in 1 case, and mild headache in 2 cases). In Yu's study [44], three patients had adverse reactions in the DKP + COC group, including TC elevation (n = 2) and direct bilirubin elevation (n = 1), and ten patients had adverse reactions in the COC group, including direct bilirubin elevation (n = 3), glutamic pyruvic transaminase elevation (n = 1), apolipoprotein A1 elevation (n = 1), TC elevation (n = 2), TG elevation (n = 2), and breast pain (n = 1). All the above adverse reactions were mild, and no serious adverse events were observed in the included trials.

3.6. Sensitivity Analysis

When the heterogeneity was high, we performed a sensitivity analysis. The results indicated that there was no significant change in the effect size of endometrial thickness, LH, or T after the one-by-one exclusion of the included literature, which confirmed the stability and reliability of the meta-analysis. Furthermore, removing Xiang et al. [41], whio investigated the influence of DKP on T, led to a decrease in heterogeneity, while the result remained significant (SMD: −1.37, 95% CI: −1.73 to−1.02, , I² = 49%). However, the result of FSH was not robust, and removing Ma et al. [29] resulted in a positive overall effect (WMD: −0.59, 95% CI: −1.13 to−0.05, ).

3.7. Publication Bias

A funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias, which showed that the symmetry between different studies was poor and that publication bias existed (Figure 12).

3.8. Quality of the Evidence

Table 3 shows a summary of the quality of evidence grades for selected primary outcomes. The quality of the evidence was downgraded to low or very low certainty according to the GRADE system. The main reason for this degradation was the limitations of the original studies because of the lack of randomization allocation and blinding, the unexplained heterogeneity between studies in the estimates of the treatment effects, the number of patients included being less than 400, and the publication bias.

4. Discussion

4.1. Main Results

The present study is the latest and most comprehensive systematic review of the effects of DKP on reproduction and metabolism in PCOS patients, including 22 RCTs (1994 participants). In this review, DKP was shown to significantly ameliorate 1) reproduction issues as evidenced by increased pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, and endometrial thickness, 2) hormone imbalances as assessed by decreased LH and T, 3) metabolic disorders as assessed by increased HOMA-β, and 4) lipid profile changes as evidenced by decreased TC, TG, and FFA in PCOS patients. However, DKP combined with Western medicine had no significant effects over Western medicine alone on anthropometric indices (BMI and WHR).

According to traditional Chinese medicine, the occurrence of PCOS is closely related to the kidneys, liver, spleen, and the Chong and conception channels, with kidney deficiency being the main cause followed by liver depression and spleen deficiency [47–49]. The combination of stasis blood, phlegm, and fluid retention, as well as water-dampness leads to a series of clinical symptoms. DKP is composed of the ingredients that have an effect on these symptoms, such as pilose antler (Cornu Cervi Pantotrichum), barbary wolfberry fruit (Fructus Lycii), and degelatined deer-horn (Cornu Cervi Degelatinatum), which warm the kidney, reinforce Yang, and nourish the liver and kidney. Chinese thorowax root (Radix Bupleuri), nutgrass galingale rhizome (Rhizoma Cyperi), Sichuan lovage rhizome (Rhizoma Ligustici Chuanxiong), and debarked peony root (Radix Paeoniae Alba) are combined to form the representative prescription Chaihu Shugan powder, which is used to disperse stagnated liver qi. Adding safflower (Flos Carthami), sanqi (Radix Notoginseng), motherwort fruit (Fructus Leonuri), and yanhusuo (Rhizoma Corydalis) promotes blood flow for regulating menstruation. Red ginseng (Radix Ginseng Rubra), largehead atractylodes rhizome (Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae), Indian bread (Poria), and licorice root (Radix Glycyrrhizae) are the famous prescriptions of Sijunzi decoction used for invigorating the spleen-stomach and replenishing qi, while debarked peony root (Radix Paeoniae Alba), prepared rehmannia root (Radix Rehmanniae Preparata), Chinese angelica (Radix Angelicae Sinensis), and Sichuan lovage rhizome (Rhizoma Ligustici Chuanxiong) are combined into a Siwu decoction as the basic prescription for nourishing blood for regulating menstruation, and the two prescriptions are combined to make the Bawu decoction, especially for benefiting qi and nourishing blood. Ass hide glue (Colla Corii Asini) is added to nourish Yin and tonify blood, and Baikal skullcap root (Radix Scutellariae) is added for clearing heat, removing dampness, and making the mixture tonic but not dry. Finally, the mixture is supplemented with honey (Mel) to reconcile the herbs. The whole prescription of DKP is rigorously formulated to harmonize Yin and Yang, coordinate Chong and the conception vessels, reinforce and eliminate in combination, nourish without stagnation and greasiness, and disperse without dispelling, all with the effect of nourishing the liver and the kidney, regulating menstruation and relieving Qi stagnation, and benefiting Qi and nourishing the blood.

Recent studies have also confirmed the efficacy of DKP in the treatment of PCOS. The chemical profiling of DKP by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography Q-exactive Orbitrap high-resolution mass spectrometry characterized over one hundred components and isomers, including amino acids, phenolic acids, lactones, terpenoids, alkaloids, saponins, flavonoids, and other compounds, among which paeoniflorin, ginsenosides, and notoginsenosides were present at high levels [18]. Modern pharmacological analysis suggests that paeoniflorin from debarked peony root (Radix Paeoniae Alba), rehmannia glutinosa polysaccharides from prepared rehmannia root (Radix Rehmanniae Preparata), and amino acids and proteins from ass hide glue (Colla Corii Asini) can enhance the hematopoietic function of the body [50–52]. Ginsenosides and notoginsenosides have been shown to be beneficial for insulin sensitivity and metabolic functions [18, 53]. Velvet antler polypeptides are one of the base components of the medicinal substances in pilose antler (Cornu Cervi Pantotrichum) and have fertility-enhancing effects [54]. The volatile oil components of largehead atractylodes rhizome (Rhizoma Atractylodis Macrocephalae) have both excitatory and inhibitory effects on the uterine smooth muscle to improve reproductive outcomes [55]. Ferulic acid in Chinese angelica (Radix Angelicae Sinensis) and Sichuan lovage rhizome (Rhizoma Ligustici Chuanxiong) and safflower yellow pigment in safflower (Flos Carthami) have shown inhibitory effects on platelet aggregation and release [56]. The lycium barbarum polysaccharide in the barbary wolfberry fruit (Fructus Lycii) can lower blood lipids and glucose levels [57]. Previous studies have shown that Chaihu Shugan powder, which is included in DKP, can regulate HPOA in women, thereby affecting serum hormone levels [58]. Sijunzi decoction has both hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic effects [59], and Siwu decoction has been proven to be effective in reversing infertility [60]. Thus, it can be seen that any of the Chinese herbal medicines or prescriptions contained in DKP exert their respective efficacies through their complex composition, which reflects the synergistic efficacy of Chinese herbal medicines among the composition of prescriptions.

Based on our analyses, DKP appears to have a positive effect on increasing the pregnancy rate, ovulation rate, and endometrial thickness in PCOS patients. Moreover, DKP also has effects on decreasing serum LH and T levels in patients with PCOS, and DKP may improve fertility through multiple possible mechanisms. PCOS is closely associated with HPOA functional disorders [2], including accelerated gonadotropin releasing-hormone pulsatile activity, increased secretion of pituitary LH, and increased ovarian secretion of T and estrogen, which can inhibit the development of follicles and oocytes, eventually contributing to ovulatory dysfunction [61]. A correlation exists between hyperandrogenemia and the development of IR and hyperinsulinemia [62], and excessive androgen also results in elevated levels of LH and FSH in PCOS patients [63]. DKP has a positive effect on restoring the feedback inhibition of HPOA, thus reducing the level of reproductive hormones, including T, LH, and FSH [16]. Furthermore, the implantation of fertilized eggs is impaired in PCOS patients because of changes in endometrial receptivity or to endometrial dysplasia because of inadequate exposure to progesterone [64]. HOXA10 is a characteristic marker of endometrial receptivity and is affected by the level of hormones [65]. An animal trial showed that DKP may play a role in improving endometrial receptivity by enhancing the expression of uterine HOXA10 [53]. In addition, ovarian fibrosis, which is characterized by the excessive proliferation of ovarian fibroblasts and deposition of extracellular matrix, is one of the pathophysiological causes of follicular dysplasia and ovulatory dysfunction in patients with PCOS [66]. DKP could be a promising approach to treating PCOS by downregulating the expression of transforming growth factor-beta 1 and connective tissue growth factor to interfere with extracellular matrix deposition [17].

IR occurs in 50% to 70% of women with PCOS [67], and the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus is influenced by IR and abnormal glucose metabolism [68]. Most women with a family history of type 2 diabetes mellitus demonstrate impaired β-cell function or a subnormal disposition index [69]. In this meta-analysis, compared with COC alone, it was observed that DKP combined with COC significantly increased HOMA-β levels in PCOS patients, which suggested that DKP might have an effect on improving insulin sensitivity. We also assessed the effects of DKP on FBG and FINS in PCOS patients. However, we were unable to find any statistical difference between the intervention and control group. It is worth mentioning that Deng et al.‘s study [21] found that FBG was significantly decreased in PCOS patients after taking DKP for three months. Ginsenosides, one of the bioactive components of DKP, play a role in inhibiting the increase in blood glucose seen in PCOS patients with IR. The hypoglycemic effect of ginsenosides is mainly achieved by inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis, activating the AMPK signaling pathway, and stimulating glucose uptake [70]. Taken together, DKP may have a greater effect on insulin sensitivity than on IR, and DKP administration decreases glucose levels by increasing insulin sensitivity.

Clinical evidence shows a close association between cardiovascular disease and atherogenic dyslipidemia, which is characterized by elevated TC, TG, and LDL-C, and reduced HDL-C [71]. About 70% of women with PCOS in the U.S. suffer from dyslipidemia and possibly an increased risk of developing cardiovascular diseases [72, 73]. Notably, our observations provide a novel dimension to present evidence for the beneficial effects of DKP in mitigating dyslipidemia in women with PCOS. DKP significantly altered TC, TG, and FFA levels compared with the COC group in this meta-analysis. While there was inadequate evidence that DKP had a favorable influence on LDL-C and HDL-C in the present meta-analysis, some findings provided support for further investigation. One RCT reported a reduction in LDL-C and no increase in HDL-C in subjects with PCOS after the intake of DKP [22]. Overweight or obesity increases the risk for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease in women with PCOS [74], and there is evidence that obesity may exacerbate IR, hyperandrogenism, or ovulatory dysfunction in PCOS, which can lead to infertility [75]. Although there was a lack of significant effect of DKP on BMI and WHR in our meta-analysis, some findings provided evidence for further exploration. The notoginsenosides found in DKP are potential active ingredients for the treatment of obesity by reducing lipid synthesis, inhibiting adipogenesis, increasing energy expenditure, and improving insulin sensitivity [76]. It can thus be seen that the results of this analysis were negative because of the insufficient survey of this critically important, yet largely ignored area, however, we cannot exclude a possible regulatory effect of DKP on anthropometric indices in PCOS patients.

Of the included trials, only two trials reported adverse reactions [43, 44]. One study [43] reported gastrointestinal or breast discomfort in the control group and the intervention group, however, the numbers of events were small and the symptoms were mild. In the other trial [44], there were three patients with abnormal serum biochemical indexes in the intervention group, however, there were ten patients presenting with abnormal indexes in the control group, and there were significant differences between the two groups. It should be mentioned that eight trials [10, 19, 21, 22, 27, 29, 34, 39, 40, 45] indicated that no adverse reactions occurred during the treatment. In addition, it is mentioned in the instructions of DKP that patients should stop taking it if they have a cold or flu. According to the current evidence, we believe that DKP is a relatively safe treatment. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of DKP in PCOS patients remains to be further explored.

4.2. Strengths and Limitations

This review has several strengths. We used metabolic indexes, lipid profiles, and anthropometric indexes as new evaluation indicators to discuss the efficacy of DKP on PCOS for the first time, consequently providing more possible therapies for PCOS. A previous meta-analysis [77], which only involved seven studies (with 658 participants), focused on the effectiveness of the combination of DKP and western medicine in ameliorating reproductive issues (ovulation rate, pregnancy rate, endometrial thickness, and hormone parameters), however, it did not perform an analysis of the effectiveness in regulating metabolic function in patients with PCOS. Moreover, our research has been registered on PROSPERO, and all procedures were faithfully executed accordingly, thus increasing the credibility of our results.

However, a few limitations exist in our study. Firstly, the follow-up time of these trials was inadequate, and the majority patients involved in the studies accepted about three months of treatment, and there was no evaluation of long-term outcomes. The live birth rate bears a great role in infertility clinical trials and is recognized as the major outcome [78]. Because of the lack of live birth rate, the trials included in this meta-analysis were insufficient to comprehensively address the role of DKP on reproductive health. Secondly, the heterogeneity between studies may stem from limitations in the methodological quality of the 22 RCTs included, such as the inappropriate use of blinding and differences in allocation concealment. Thirdly, although there were no language restrictions in the search, all trials were conducted in China, and 21 studies were published in domestic journals, which may lead to publication bias. It has been shown that publication bias in Chinese medical journals exists objectively because of the fact that negative results from clinical studies are not easily published and trials with small sample sizes are published [79]. The limitations mentioned above may affect the reliability of this meta-analysis, and thus the results in this review need to be interpreted with caution.

4.3. Implications for the Future

Clinical studies on interventions using DKP for PCOS are gradually increasing. In our meta-analysis, 18 RCTs were published between 2012 and 2020, followed by 4 RCTs published in 2021, indicating that DKP is a relatively new treatment for PCOS and that this intervention has great research value. Furthermore, we hope that modern clinical research on Chinese patent herbal medicines (such as DKP) can be spread to other countries to obtain more high-quality evidence for the use of such medicines in the clinic. At present, there is no single drug that is capable of treating infertility and metabolic complications associated with PCOS. As a multicomponent drug compound, DKP may have a role in the treatment of PCOS through multitarget synergistic actions. Therefore, future research on DKP for PCOS should focus on metabolic outcomes to identify more therapeutic methods for treating PCOS.

5. Conclusion

In summary, our results indicate that DKP has a promising application in modifying the reproductive and metabolic abnormalities in patients with PCOS and may be used as a primary choice in conventional or complementary therapies for PCOS. However, considering the inherent limitations and heterogeneity among the studies analyzed here, our results should be interpreted with caution. We expect more prospective large-scale and well-designed RCTs with longer intervention durations to further determine the clinical efficacy and safety of DKP in treating PCOS.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Bao Jin and Yang Zhang are the co-first authors.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Young Scientists Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81803945), the Scientific Research Project of Traditional Chinese Medicine in Heilongjiang Province (ZHY19024), and the Project of Young Innovative Talents in Colleges and Universities in Heilongjiang Province (UNPYSCT-2016216).

Supplementary Materials

Table S1. Search strategy. Figures S1–S6. Results of subgroup analyses. (Supplementary Materials)

References

D. T. Baird, A. Balen, H. F. Escobar-Morreale et al., “Health and fertility in World Health Organization group 2 anovulatory women,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 586–599, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. McCartney and J. C. Marshall, “Polycystic ovary syndrome,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 375, no. 1, pp. 54–64, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. J. Teede, M. L. Misso, M. F. Costello et al., “Recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 364–379, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Morgante, M. G. Massaro, A. Di Sabatino, V. Cappelli, and V. De Leo, “Therapeutic approach for metabolic disorders and infertility in women with PCOS,” Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 4–9, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Riestenberg, A. Jagasia, D. Markovic, R. P. Buyalos, and R. Azziz, “Health care-related economic burden of polycystic ovary syndrome in the United States: pregnancy-related and long-term health consequences,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 575–585, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Homburg, “Clomiphene citrate--end of an era? A mini-review,” Human Reproduction (Oxford), vol. 20, no. 8, pp. 2043–2051, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Brown, C. Farquhar, J. Beck, C. Boothroyd, and E. Hughes, “Clomiphene and anti-oestrogens for ovulation induction in PCOS,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, vol. 4, Article ID CD002249, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kilic-Okman, M. Kucuk, and S. Altaner, “Comparison of the effects of letrozole and clomiphene citrate on ovarian follicles, endometrium, and hormone levels in the rat,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 80, no. 6, pp. 1330–1332, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Naderpoor, S. Shorakae, A. Joham, J. Boyle, B. D. Courten, and H. J. Teede, “Obesity and polycystic ovary syndrome,” Minerva Endocrinologica, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 37–51, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Deng, Current Situation Investigation and Clinical and Basic Research of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China, pp. 1–98, 2020.
The Chinese Pharmacopoeia Commission, Pharmacopoeia of the People's republic of China, China Medical Science Press, Beijing, China, 2015.
J. Y. Song, D. D. Gao, X. L. Cao et al., “The role of traditional Chinese formula ding-kun pill (DKP) in expected poor ovarian response women (POSEIDON group 4) undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial,” Frontiers in Endocrinology, vol. 12, Article ID 675997, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. X. Chen and K. Ma, “Systematic evaluation of clinical application of Dingkundan,” China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, vol. 40, no. 20, pp. 3916–3919, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
X. X. Yi and J. Lin, “Clinical observation of Dingkun Dan in the treatment of 30 patients with hypomenorrhea due to Kidney deficiency and liver Depression Syndrome,” Chinese Journal of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 629–631, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Y. Zhao, Y. Liang, X. Gao, Y. Y. Liu, and K. Chang, “Therapeutic effect of acupuncture combined with Dingkun Dan on polycystic ovary syndrome of liver depression and qi stagnation,” Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 194–198, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. R. Song, W. Y. Wang, and B. Wei, “Effect of Dingkundan on reproductive function of polycystic ovary model rats,” Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Anhui, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 1473–1477, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Chen, Y. Tan, and S. P. Chen, “Effect of Dingkundan on the expression of TGF- β 1, CTGF and AR in PCOS model rats,” Chinese Journal of Immunology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 218–222, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Gao, N. Wang, J. P. Jia, P. Y. Wang, A. R. Zhang, and X. M. Qin, “Chemical profliling of Dingkun Dan by ultra High performance liquid chromatography Q exactive orbitrap high resolution mass spectrometry,” Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, vol. 177, Article ID 112732, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. W. Wei, H. D. Z. Xiao, and Y. L. Song, “Observation on the efficacy of Dingkundan combined with clomiphene in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome with infertility,” Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 444–447, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Chen, Y. Tan, and S. P. Chen, “Study on the efficacy of clomiphene and Dingkundan in the treatment of ovulation induction and clinical pregnancy in patients with PCOS infertility,” China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, vol. 42, no. 20, pp. 4035–4039, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Deng, W. Xue, Y. F. Wang et al., “Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome improved by Chinese medicine Dingkun pill: a randomized controlled clinical trial,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 246–251, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Deng, Y. F. Wang, S. Y. Zhu et al., “Is there an advantage of using Dingkun pill alone or in combination with diane-35 for management of polycystic ovary syndrome? A randomized controlled trial,” Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 883–889, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and PRISMA Group, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 1006–1012, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. T. Higgins, J. Thomas, J. Chandler et al., “Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions,” 2022, http://www.cochranehandbook.org.
View at: Google Scholar
G. H. Guyatt, A. D. Oxman, G. E. Vist et al., “GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations,” BMJ, vol. 336, no. 7650, pp. 924–926, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. X. Du, “Efficacy of Dingkundan combined with clomiphene in the treatment of infertility with polycystic ovary syndrome,” Journal of North Pharmacy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 63-64, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
X. H. Hu and Y. L. Zhu, “Clinical observation of Dingkundan combined with clomiphene on ovulation induction in polycystic ovary syndrome of kidney deficiency syndrome,” in Proceedings of the 12th National Traditional Chinese Medicine and Gynecology Academic Conference of the Gynecology Branch of the Chinese Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine, pp. 598–600, Xi’an, China, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. Li and Y. Li, “Clinical analysis of Dingkundan and clomiphene in the treatment of infertility caused by polycystic ovary syndrome,” World Latest Medicine Information, vol. 18, no. 76, pp. 181-182, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Ma, “Clinical analysis of Dingkundan combined with letrozole in the treatment of ovulation induction cycle in patients with PCOS,” Heilongjiang Medicine Journal, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1035–1037, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. F. Qin, L. Y. Zhu, Y. Zhao, X. W. You, Y. H. Wang, and S. M. Pan, “Efficacy of Dingkundan in the treatment of infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome,” Henan Medical Research, vol. 30, no. 22, pp. 4165–4168, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
A. L. Ren, “Effect of Dingkundan combined with clomiphene on polycystic ovary syndrome of kidney deficiency and its effect on ovulation induction,” Medical Innovation of China, vol. 17, no. 17, pp. 91–94, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. L. Wang and H. Y. Liu, “Clinical analysis of Dingkundan and clomiphene in the treatment of infertility caused by polycystic ovary syndrome,” Guide to health care, vol. 40, p. 297, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
A. W. Wei, “Dingkundan combined with clomiphene in the treatment of 30 cases of polycystic ovary syndrome with infertility,” in Proceedings of the 12th National Traditional Chinese Medicine and Gynecology Academic Conference of the Gynecology Branch of the Chinese Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine, pp. 559-560, Xi’an, China, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
X. J. Wei, B. H. Wei, M. Chai, and A. P. Peng, “Clinical observation of letrozole combined with Dingkundan in the treatment of ovulation induction in infertile patients with polycystic ovary syndrome,” Maternal and Child Health Care of China, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 1105–1107, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. L. Yu, “Study on the efficacy of clomiphene and Dingkundan in the treatment of ovulation induction and clinical pregnancy in patients with PCOS infertility,” Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 95, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. J. Yuan, “Study on the efficacy of clomiphene and Dingkundan in the treatment of ovulation induction and clinical pregnancy in patients with PCOS infertility,” Electronic Journal of Practical Gynecological Endocrinology, vol. 6, no. 33, pp. 124-125, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Yu, X. Y. Wang, H. Tang, H. J. Zhang, and F. Y. Hu, “Clinical study of Dingkundan combined with letrozole in the treatment of infertility with polycystic ovary syndrome,” Psychological monthly, vol. 15, no. 23, pp. 227-228, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Yu, “Clinical effect of Dingkundan combined with letrozole in the treatment of infertility caused by polycystic ovary syndrome,” Chinese Journal of Clinical Rational Drug Use, vol. 14, no. 13, pp. 121-122, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
R. X. Zhai, “Clinical observation of Dingkundan combined with clomiphene in the treatment of infertility (phlegm-dampness) caused by polycystic ovary syndrome,” Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 48–50, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Chu, X. L. Wang, and R. X. Wang, “Clinical observation of Dingkundan combined with letrozole in the treatment of infertility with polycystic ovary syndrome of kidney deficiency syndrome,” Journal of Anhui University of Chinese Medicine, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 27–31, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Xiang, X. J. Quan, H. L. Yang, Y. L. Ma, X. H. Wu, and W. W. Wu, “Effect of dingkundan on sex hormone level, insulin resistance and pregnancy in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome,” Progress in Modern Biomedicine, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 578–581, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. X. Zhong, “Clinical observation of Dingkun Dan in the treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome,” Journal of Practical Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 283-284, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Y. Chen, “Clinical observation of artificial cycle combined with Dingkundan in the treatment of irregular menstruation caused by PCOS,” Journal of North Pharmacy, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 55-56, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Yu, Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Dinkundan Combined with Diane-35 in the Treatment of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China, pp. 3–35, 2020.
G. Zhang, “Efficacy of Dingkundan combined with spironolone ethinylestradiol tablets in the treatment of infertility in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome,” Chronic Pathematology Journal, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1527–1529, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group, R. Tarlatzis, and A. Dunaif, “Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria and long-term health risks related to polycystic ovary syndrome,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 19–25, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Pan, X. P. Wang, and G. X. Wang, “Current situation of TCM Research on tonifying Kidney and activating Blood Circulation in the treatment of Polycystic ovary syndrome,” Journal of Basic Chinese Medicine, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1508–1510, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Wang and Y. Liu, “Failure of emotion is one of the important causes of polycystic ovary syndrome--Professor Li Guangrong's clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of polycystic ovary syndrome,” China Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Pharmacy, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 1812-1813, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Chen, “Discussion on the pathogenesis of polycystic ovary syndrome from the perspective of deficiency of kidney and spleen and stagnation of phlegm and blood stasis,” Journal of Basic Chinese Medicine, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 267–269, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Zhang, Y. F. Huang, L. L. Wang et al., “Comparative study on effects of blood enriching on mouse model of blood deficiency syndrome induced by compound method of bleeding, starved feeding and exhausting of Paeoniae Radix Alba and Paeoniae Radix Rubra, paeoniflorin and albiflorin,” Chinese Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, vol. 38, no. 19, pp. 3358–3362, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Zhou, F. F. Sun, Z. L. Zhang, and X. Y. Zheng, “Potential clinical mechanism of shudihuang (Rehmanniae radix praeparata) based on network pharmacology in treatment of anemia,” Chinese Archives of Traditional Chinese Medicine, vol. 39, no. 5, 2021.
View at: Google Scholar
G. N. Mao, Q. Guo, J. B. Qu, and X. Li, “Progress on chemical component and drug action of colla corii asini,” Progress in Veterinary Medicine, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 83–85, 2010.
View at: Google Scholar
Z. Chen, C. M. Li, C. X. Yang, R. H. Zhao, X. J. Mao, and J. Yu, “Lipid regulation effects of raw and processed notoginseng radix et rhizome on steatotic hepatocyte L02 cell,” Biomed Research International, vol. 2016, Article ID 2919034, 9 pages, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. F. Wu, H. Q. Li, L. J. Jin et al., “Deer antler base as a traditional Chinese medicine: a review of its traditional uses, chemistry and pharmacology,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 145, no. 2, pp. 403–415, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Chen and D. Q. Dou, “Chemical study on the nature and flavour of Atractylodes macrocephala Koidz,” Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1702–1708, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Z. Xiang, H. C. Shang, and B. L. Zhang, “Advances in studies on Chinese materia medica with antiplatelet function,” Chinese Traditional and Herbal Drugs, no. 2, pp. 290–294, 2008.
View at: Google Scholar
B. J. Zhou, H. Xia, L. G. Yang, S. K. Wang, and G. J. Sun, “The effect of Lycium barbarum polysaccharide on the glucose and lipid metabolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of the American College of Nutrition, pp. 1–9, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Zhang, J. J. Zhao, Y. Z. Wang, and L. Li, “Research progress in pharmacological effects and mechanism of Chaihu shugan powder,” Journal of Chinese Medicinal Materials, vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 128–131, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
X. J. Duan, P. Liu, K. Wang et al., “Pharmacodynamic study of Sijunzi decoction on regulating the disturbance of glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetic mice,” Lishizhen Medicine and Materia Medica Research, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 62–64, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
X. J. Qi, Z. P. Zhang, H. Z. Zhang et al., “Analysis of medication regularity of famous traditional Chinese Medicine in the treatment of Infertility based on data Mining,” China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1491–1496, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
M. O. Goodarzi, D. A. Dumesic, G. Chazenbalk, and R. Azziz, “Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 219–231, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. T. Ye, T. T. Xie, Y. L. Song, and L. L. Zhou, “The role of androgen and its related signals in PCOS,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 1825–1837, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Moghetti and F. Tosi, “Insulin resistance and PCOS: chicken or egg?” Journal of Endocrinological Investigation, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 233–244, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Azziz, “Polycystic ovary syndrome,” Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 132, no. 2, pp. 321–336, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Zhu, S. L. Yi, X. M. Huang, J. Meng, H. X. Sun, and J. J. Zhou, “Human chorionic gonadotropin improves endometrial receptivity by increasing the expression of homeobox A10,” Molecular Human Reproduction, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 413–424, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Zhou, L. B. Shi, and S. Y. Zhang, “Ovarian fibrosis: a phenomenon of concern,” Chinese Medical Journal, vol. 130, no. 3, pp. 365–371, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. M. DeUgarte, A. A. Bartolucci, and R. Azziz, “Prevalence of insulin resistance in the polycystic ovary syndrome using the homeostasis model assessment,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 1454–1460, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sacerdote, P. Dave, V. Lokshin, and G. Bahtiyar, “Type 2 diabetes mellitus, insulin resistance, and vitamin D,” Current Diabetes Reports, vol. 19, no. 10, p. 101, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. A. Ehrmann, K. Kasza, R. Azziz, R. S. Legro, M. N. Ghazzi, and P. C. O. S. /T. Study Group, “Effects of race and family history of type 2 diabetes on metabolic status of women with polycystic ovary syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 66–71, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Liu, J. Deng, and D. Fan, “Ginsenoside Rk3 ameliorates high-fat-diet/streptozocin induced type 2 diabetes mellitus in mice via the AMPK/Akt signaling pathway,” Food & Function, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 2538–2551, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Chapman, H. N. Ginsberg, P. Amarenco et al., “Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease: evidence and guidance for management,” European Heart Journal, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1345–1361, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Legro, A. R. Kunselman, and A. Dunaif, “Prevalence and predictors of dyslipidemia in women with polycystic ovary syndrome,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 111, no. 8, pp. 607–613, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Osibogun, O. Ogunmoroti, and E. D. Michos, “Polycystic ovary syndrome and cardiometabolic risk: opportunities for cardiovascular disease prevention,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 399–404, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Insenser, M. Murri, R. del Campo, M. Á. Martínez-García, E. Fernández-Durán, and H. F. Escobar-Morreale, “Gut microbiota and the polycystic ovary syndrome: influence of sex, sex hormones, and obesity,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 103, no. 7, pp. 2552–2562, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Zeng, Y. J. Xie, Y. T. Liu, S. L. Long, and Z. C. Mo, “Polycystic ovarian syndrome: correlation between hyperandrogenism, insulin resistance and obesity,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 502, pp. 214–221, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. L. Zhang, B. Zhang, C. Y. Zhang, G. B. Sun, and X. B. Sun, “Effect of panax notoginseng saponins and major anti-obesity components on weight loss,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 11, Article ID 601751, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Zheng, Z. Q. Liu, and B. L. Wang, “Necessity and safety evaluation of combined use of Dingkundan in the treatment of PCOS with sex hormone-related drugs,” Journal Of HuBei Minzu University(Medical Edition), vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 14–19, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group, “Improving the reporting of clinical trials of infertility treatments (IMPRINT): modifying the CONSORT statement,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 952–959.e15, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. M. Chen, “Investigation and reflection on publication bias of papers published in medical journals in China,” Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 715–720, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Bao Jin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

292

Downloads

449

Citations