Table of Contents
Economics Research International
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 9752520, 10 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9752520
Research Article

Cournot and Bertrand Competition in the Software Industry

1Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Via Cosimo Ridolfi 10, 56124 Pisa, Italy
2Department of Economics, Kozminski University, Jagiellońska Street 57/59, 03-301 Warsaw, Poland

Correspondence should be addressed to Domenico Buccella

Received 13 July 2016; Revised 31 October 2016; Accepted 4 December 2016; Published 27 February 2017

Academic Editor: Jean Paul Chavas

Copyright © 2017 Luciano Fanti and Domenico Buccella. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. N. Singh and X. Vives, “Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 546–554, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. J.-C. Rochet and J. Tirole, “Platform competition in two-sided markets,” Journal of the European Economic Association, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 990–1029, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. E. Katsamakas and Y. Bakos, “Design and ownership of two-sided networks,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 99–120, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Armstrong, “Competition in two-sided markets,” RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 668–691, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Rysman, “The economics of two-sided markets,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 125–143, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. L. Cheng, “Comparing bertrand and cournot equilibria: a geometric approach,” The RAND Journal of Economics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 146–152, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. X. Vives, “On the efficiency of Bertrand and Cournot equilibria with product differentiation,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 166–175, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  8. K. Okuguchi, “Equilibrium prices in the Bertrand and Cournot oligopolies,” Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 128–139, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  9. P. Zanchettin, “Differentiated duopoly with asymmetric costs,” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 999–1015, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. Chirco and M. Scrimitore, “Choosing price or quantity? The role of delegation and network externalities,” Economics Letters, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 482–486, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  11. R. Pal, “Cournot vs. Bertrand under relative performance delegation: implications of positive and negative network externalities,” Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 75, pp. 94–101, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  12. M. Alipranti, C. Milliou, and E. Petrakis, “Price vs. quantity competition in a vertically related market,” Economics Letters, vol. 124, no. 1, pp. 122–126, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  13. A. Mukherjee, U. Broll, and S. Mukherjee, “Bertrand versus cournot competition in a vertical structure: a note,” Manchester School, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 545–559, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. X. Nguyen, P. Sgro, and M. Nabin, “Licensing under vertical product differentiation: price vs. quantity competition,” Economic Modelling, vol. 36, pp. 600–606, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. L. Fanti and N. Meccheri, “The Cournot-Bertrand profit differential in a differentiated duopoly with unions and labour decreasing returns,” Economics Bulletin, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 233–244, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Choi, “Price and quantity competition in a unionised mixed duopoly: the cases of substitutes and complements,” Australian Economic Papers, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. L. Fanti and N. Meccheri, “On the Cournot-Bertrand profit differential and the structure of unionisation in a managerial duopoly,” Australian Economic Papers, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 266–287, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. J. Hinloopen and J. Vandekerckhove, “Dynamic efficiency of cournot and bertrand competition: input versus output spillovers,” Journal of Economics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 119–136, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. J. Hinloopen and J. Vandekerckhove, “Product market competition and investments in cooperative R&D,” The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 11, no. 1, article no. 55, 2011. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. H. Tremblay and V. J. Tremblay, “The Cournot-Bertrand model and the degree of product differentiation,” Economics Letters, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 233–235, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  21. V. J. Tremblay, C. H. Tremblay, and K. Isariyawongse, “Endogenous timing and strategic choice: the Cournot-Bertrand model,” Bulletin of Economic Research, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 332–342, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  22. N. Economides and E. Katsamakas, “Two-sided competition of proprietary vs. open source technology platforms and the implications for the software industry,” Management Science, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1057–1071, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. A. K. Dixit, “A model of duopoly suggesting a theory of entry barriers,” Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 20–32, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar