Review Article | Open Access
Care of the Critically Ill Emergency Department Patient with Acute Kidney Injury
Introduction. Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is common and associated with significant mortality and complications. Exact data on the epidemiology of AKI in the Emergency Department (ED) are sparse. This review aims to summarise the key principles for managing AKI patients in the ED. Principal Findings. Timely resuscitation, goal-directed correction of fluid depletion and hypotension, and appropriate management of the underlying illness are essential in preventing or limiting AKI. There is no specific curative therapy for AKI. Key principles of secondary prevention are identification of patients with early AKI, discontinuation of nephrotoxic medication where possible, attention to fluid resuscitation, and awareness of the risks of contrast-induced nephropathy. In patients with advanced AKI, arrangements for renal replacement therapy need to be made before the onset of life-threatening uraemic complications. Conclusions. Research and guidelines regarding AKI in the ED are lacking and AKI practice from critical care departments should be adopted.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in hospitalised patients, especially in those who are critically ill [1, 2]. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) working group estimates a worldwide AKI prevalence of ~2100 people per million population .
There is increasing recognition that even a minor acute reduction in renal function is independently associated with a poor outcome, including higher risk of complications, longer stay in hospital, high mortality, and increased risk of needing long-term dialysis [4–9]. Although there is no curative therapy for AKI, research over the past decade has identified various means to prevent or limit AKI. Unfortunately, these are not widely known and are variably practised worldwide resulting in lost opportunities to improve the care and outcomes of patients with AKI. Importantly, there is no unifying approach to the care of these patients. There is a worldwide need to recognise patients at risk of AKI, to intervene early, and to circumvent the need for renal replacement therapy (RRT).
Although a large proportion of patients presenting to the Emergency Department (ED) either have AKI or develop AKI later in hospital, the literature regarding epidemiology and management of such patients in the ED setting is lacking. In the UK, the recent National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death (NCEPOD) report found that AKI is often underrecognised and poorly managed. The report made a strong call for better education and training . To our best knowledge, neither the College of Emergency Medicine (UK), American College of Emergency Physicians, Australasian College for Emergency Medicine, nor Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians have published guidelines on management of AKI in the ED. This review aims to summarise existing knowledge about the management of AKI with particular emphasis on specific patient groups in the ED setting.
2. Definition of AKI
The literature contains >50 definitions for AKI which has posed significant problems for comparative epidemiology and clinical research. In the last 10 years, efforts have been made to standardise the definition of AKI. In 2004, the Risk-Injury-Failure-Loss-Endstage (RIFLE) criteria were published, followed by the revised AKI Network (AKIN) classification in 2007 [11, 12] (Table 1). Both definitions will soon be superceded by the KDIGO criteria which define AKI by any of the following:(i)increase in serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL (>26.5 μmol/L) within 48 hours; (ii)increase in serum creatinine to ≥1.5 times baseline, which is known or presumed to have occurred within prior 7 days; or(iii)urine volume <0.5 mL/kg/h for 6 hours.
|(a) RIFLE classification |
|(b) AKI Network classification |
|(c) KDIGO classification |
|Abbreviations: GFR: glomerular filtration rate; RRT: renal replacement therapy; SCr: serum creatinine. |
Only one criterion needs to be met to be classified as AKI; if both are present, the criterion which places the patient in the higher stage of AKI is selected.
The scale of the AKI burden in ED is not known. However, the key issue is that even relatively minor acute changes in serum creatinine independent of underlying aetiology represent significant deterioration of renal function and are associated with poor outcome .
3. Pathophysiology of AKI
There is increasing evidence that AKI is an inflammatory process involving complex interactions between vascular, tubular, and inflammatory factors. It is often precipitated by sepsis/systemic inflammatory response syndrome, renal hypoperfusion, volume depletion, and nephrotoxicity. In most cases, the aetiology is multifactorial. Patients with pre-existing comorbidities including diabetes, cirrhosis/hepatic failure, congestive heart failure, pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD), peripheral vascular disease and advanced age are at particular risk of AKI during an acute illness.
4. Diagnosis of AKI
The symptoms of AKI may be vague, nonspecific, or even absent. The diagnosis of AKI currently depends on detection of reductions in kidney function by conventional surrogate markers, such as serum creatinine and urine output. However, both are known to have significant limitations. Furthermore, the RIFLE, AKIN, and KDIGO criteria for AKI are based on relative changes in serum creatinine from baseline. If a baseline creatinine is not known it would seem prudent to assume that any elevated laboratory creatinine is AKI until proven otherwise. Furthermore, creatinine rises are typically seen 24–36 hours after the initial insult which means that critically ill patients may already have significant AKI even if their serum creatinine has not changed yet. The diagnostic workup of patients with AKI depends on the history, clinical signs, and patient characteristics (Table 2).
5. Management of AKI
Early recognition of at-risk patients is paramount followed by timely resuscitation with fluids and/or vasoactive drugs and prevention of further renal insults.
5.1. Fluid Therapy
The most commonly used fluids are crystalloids and colloids, including gelatins, human albumin, and hydroxyethyl starches (HES) with varying effects on volume expansion. Ideally, balanced crystalloid solutions should be used, as 0.9% saline is associated with hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis and worsening acid-base balance. Data on the safety of different colloids are conflicting . High molecular weight HESs have been associated with an increased risk of AKI, greater need for RRT, and higher mortality and should therefore be avoided [14–16]. Human albumin has been judged to be safe .
Although timely fluid resuscitation is important to prevent AKI in conditions associated with volume depletion, there is increasing evidence that excessive fluid administration can be harmful and lead to dysfunction of other organs and adverse outcomes [17, 18]. To avoid both hypo- and hypervolaemia, patients need to be assessed regularly, and fluid prescriptions should be individualised and tailored to the cardiovascular status of the patient. Ultrasound sonography has emerged as a tool to aid the evaluation of fluid status and response to fluid challenges [19, 20]. However, if in doubt, invasive haemodynamic monitoring may be necessary to distinguish fluid responsive patients from those who are hypotensive due to vasodilation.
5.2. Vasoactive Drugs
In healthy conditions, renal blood flow is stable within a wide range of mean arterial pressure (MAP) due to renal autoregulation. However, in critically ill patients, in particular in septic shock, derangements in microcirculation and vasoreactivity tend to increase the MAP threshold that guarantees autoregulation. Data on the optimal MAP to prevent the development and/or progression of AKI are conflicting. Current recommendations for the prevention of AKI in the ICU propose to achieve a MAP ≥65 mmHg but indicate that this target pressure should be individualised when possible, especially in patients with pre-existing chronic hypertension . There is good evidence that Noradrenaline in vasodilatory shock can increase renal blood flow, restore urine output, and improve creatinine clearance [21, 22]. In contrast, there is no role for “renal-dose” dopamine in either preventing or ameliorating AKI in critically ill patients [23, 24].
There is no role for diuretics in preventing or treating established AKI. Three meta-analyses confirmed that the use of diuretics in established AKI did not improve renal function or change mortality but carried a significant risk of side effects, including electrolyte derangement, ototoxicity, and vestibular dysfunction [25–27]. There is also no role for diuretics in speeding up recovery of renal function . However, in patients with progressive fluid accumulation, diuretics can minimize fluid overload and may make patient management easier, especially if RRT is not immediately available.
5.4. Other Pharmacological Therapies
There is no evidence for routine use of natriuretic peptide, aprotinin, thyroxine, statins, activated protein C, steroids, or calcium channel blockers to prevent AKI in patients who are critically ill [15, 29, 30].
5.5. Discontinuation of Potentially Nephrotoxic Drugs
Together with targeted fluid and haemodynamic resuscitative procedures, it is essential to stop/limit all nephrotoxic drugs. When selected medications are considered vital, doses need to be adjusted regularly based on changes to kidney function.
6. Prevention of AKI in Specific Patient Groups
6.1. Cardiac Disease
The incidence of AKI in acute decompensated heart failure and acute coronary syndrome is estimated to be 24–45% and 9–19%, respectively . Any treatment for acute heart failure aimed at increasing cardiac output and renal blood flow should also lead to improved renal function. Therapeutic options include fluid therapy, inotropic support and if necessary, cautious introduction of noradrenaline but occasionally more invasive treatments like an intra-aortic balloon pump or left ventricular assist device may be required.
Estimates from small studies suggest that 20–50% of patients with rhabdomyolysis develop AKI as a result of intravascular fluid depletion, fluid sequestration in injured muscle, renal hypoperfusion, intratubular heme pigment cast formation, and tubular obstruction. There may be additional secondary renal injury due to free radical production and myoglobin-induced nitric oxide scavenging. The cornerstone for prevention of myoglobinuric AKI consists of aggressive volume resuscitation with isotonic crystalloid solutions at 10–15 mL/kg/hr aiming for a target urine output of >200 mL/hr . Isotonic bicarbonate (NaHCO3) at 50–100 mmol/L can be added aiming for a urine to increase the solubility and renal excretion of tubular myoglobin. Although there are theoretical benefits for adding mannitol (inhibition of intratubular myoglobin deposition and cast formation, and osmotic diuresis), these benefits are not supported by randomised controlled trials .
6.3. Contrast Exposure
The risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is determined by pre-existing renal function, presence of risk factors, and the volume of radiocontrast agent. Patients with advanced age, diabetes, pre-existing CKD, haemodynamic instability, and myeloma are at particular risk. Crystalloid fluids are usually recommended for prevention [15, 34]. Both protocolised administration of 0.9% saline or isotonic NaHCO3 have the potential to reduce the incidence of CIN with some evidence that sodium bicarbonate may be superior to saline. The role of N-Acetylcysteine (NAC) is controversial due to inconsistent results observed across multiple studies. Several meta-analyses have reported a risk reduction with NAC but also highlighted significant study heterogeneity and positive reporting bias [35–38]. In addition, concern has been raised that the variable efficacy of intravenous NAC against CIN could be explained by differences in study populations and direct effects of NAC on measured serum creatinine levels. As a result, the working party of the European Society of Intensive Care suggests not to use NAC as prophylaxis against CIN . In contrast, the American Thoracic Society Ad Hoc Committee on Acute Renal Failure recommended that in patients at high risk of CIN, intravenous NAC in combination with fluids may be considered but pointed out that the evidence was not sufficient . Diabetic patients who are taking metformin are at risk of developing lactic acidosis following contrast exposure, especially in case of pre-existing CDK . It seems prudent to discontinue metformin for at least 48 hours after contrast exposure and to restart it only if there are no signs of nephrotoxicity.
7. Management of Uraemic Complications
In patients with advanced AKI, renal support should be started before the onset of life-threatening uraemic complications. In fact, many patients develop AKI in the community but may not present to the Emergency Department until they develop uraemic symptoms. Patients with AKI and progressive hyperkalaemia ( mmol/L), refractory metabolic acidosis, progressive pulmonary oedema, and/or uraemic pericarditis need to be referred to the renal or critical care team urgently. Whilst waiting for RRT, medical treatment may be considered.
7.1. Medical Treatment of Hyperkalaemia
Severe hyperkalaemia (serum potassium >6.5 mmol/litre) can cause cardiac arrhythmias and should be treated immediately. Initial management consists of stabilization of the myocardium with calcium gluconate or calcium chloride . Although this is a short-term measure only and will not reduce serum potassium, it reduces the arrhythmic threshold. A recent review by the Cochrane Collaboration confirmed that inhaled beta-agonists, nebulised beta-agonists, and intravenous insulin and glucose were all effective at reducing potassium levels, in particular when administered in combination . The evidence for the use of intravenous NaHCO3 to treat hyperkalaemia was considered to be equivocal. Potassium-absorbing resins have no role in the emergency management of hyperkalaemia mainly due to the delay in effect. There is also no clear evidence that means to increase urine output and potassium excretion (e.g., by fluid resuscitation or by loop diuretics) are sufficient to correct hyperkalaemia. If medical therapy fails to correct hyperkalaemia, RRT needs to be considered.
7.2. Medical Management of Fluid Overload/Pulmonary Oedema
If significant respiratory failure is present, this must be dealt with urgently, through supplementary oxygen, noninvasive ventilation, or intubation and ventilation, depending on the state of the patient . While these measures are being undertaken, pharmacological treatment to induce diuresis and offload the decompensated heart can be started, including intravenous opioids, an intravenous infusion of nitrate and diuretics to provoke a diuresis. Converting oliguric to nonoliguric renal failure may help with fluid and electrolyte management, but does not alter the course of AKI and does not change the eventual need for dialysis or overall mortality. Importantly, diuretics may delay the start of RRT otherwise indicated. If medical therapies are not successful, or if the patient is in extremis such that diuretics seem unlikely to prove effective, fluid removal by RRT is the definitive answer.
7.3. Medical Management of Metabolic Acidosis
Adverse effects of acute metabolic acidosis primarily include decreased cardiac output, arterial dilatation with hypotension, altered oxygen delivery, decreased ATP production, predisposition to arrhythmias, and impairment of the immune response. In patients with severe metabolic acidosis () and evidence of cardiovascular compromise, administration of NaHCO3 should be considered to maintain blood pH at ~7.2 . If NaHCO3 is administered, it should be given as an isotonic preparation (to prevent hyperosmolality) and as a slow infusion rather than an intravenous bolus (to reduce generation of CO2), in quantities designed to raise blood pH to levels not greater than 7.2. Isotonic (1.26%) solutions may also have a role in stable patients with a moderate to severe acidosis and a requirement for fluid replacement, in whom RRT is not imminent.
7.4. Management of Uraemic Pericarditis
The prevalence of uraemic pericarditis in patients with acute or chronic kidney disease is 6–10%. Affected patients are often asymptomatic but may be complaining of chest pain. They often have a small to moderate pericardial effusion which can progress to significant haemodynamic compromise. The only therapy is RRT and pericardiocentesis in case of significant pericardial effusions. Therefore, the presence of a pericardial rub on clinical examination and classic ECG changes consistent with pericarditis are indications for urgent RRT and an urgent echocardiogram.
8. Future Developments
The characterisation of novel AKI biomarkers has improved the understanding of the pathophysiology of AKI and provided tools to diagnose AKI earlier than serum creatinine. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is one of the most promising new biomarkers and has been extensively studied in different patient populations [43, 44]. In a prospective study of 635 adults presenting to the ED, a single elevated urinary NGAL result was shown to predict the development of AKI, need for RRT and/or need for ICU admission . More research is necessary to determine the role of these new biomarkers in clinical practice.
ED physicians should consider the possibility of AKI or incipient AKI in all of their critically ill patients and remember that even small rises in serum creatinine are associated with detrimental short- and long-term effects. At-risk patients need to be identified early. Fluid and haemodynamic resuscitation should be prompt, but patients need to be regularly monitored and reviewed to prevent fluid overload. There is no curative therapy for AKI. Secondary prevention with cessation of nephrotoxic medications is essential. More research is necessary to explore whether any other strategies in the ED could improve the prognosis of patients with AKI.
- S. M. Bagshaw, C. George, and R. Bellomo, “Changes in the incidence and outcome for early acute kidney injury in a cohort of Australian intensive care units,” Critical Care, vol. 11, article R68, 2007.
- M. Ostermann and R. Chang, “Correlation between the AKI classification and outcome,” Critical Care, vol. 12, no. 6, aricle R144, 2008.
- G. M. Chertow, E. Burdick, M. Honour, J. V. Bonventre, and D. W. Bates, “Acute kidney injury, mortality, length of stay, and costs in hospitalized patients,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 3365–3370, 2005.
- S. G. Coca, B. Yusuf, M. G. Shlipak, A. X. Garg, and C. R. Parikh, “Long-term risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 961–973, 2009.
- J. P. Lafrance and D. R. Miller, “Acute kidney injury associates with increased long-term mortality,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 345–352, 2010.
- R. Wald, R. R. Quinn, J. Luo et al., “Chronic dialysis and death among survivors of acute kidney injury requiring dialysis,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 302, no. 11, pp. 1179–1185, 2009.
- L. J. Lo, A. S. Go, G. M. Chertow et al., “Dialysis-requiring acute renal failure increases the risk of progressive chronic kidney disease,” Kidney International, vol. 76, no. 8, pp. 893–899, 2009.
- C. V. Thakar, J. P. Yared, S. Worley, K. Cotman, and E. P. Paganini, “Renal dysfunction and serious infections after open-heart surgery,” Kidney International, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 239–246, 2003.
- “Adding Insult to Injury: a review of patients who died with a primary diagnosis of acute kidney injury (Acute Renal Failure),” The National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcomes and Death—Adding Insult to Injury, 2009, http://www.ncepod.org.uk/.
- R. Bellomo, C. Ronco, J. A. Kellum, R. L. Mehta, and P. Palevsky, “Acute renal failure—definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group,” Critical Care, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. R204–R212, 2004.
- R. L. Mehta, J. A. Kellum, S. V. Shah et al., “Acute kidney injury network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury,” Critical Care, vol. 11, article R31, 2007.
- A. B. Groeneveld, R. J. Navickis, and M. M. Wilkes, “Update on the comparative safety of colloids: a systematic review of clinical studies,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 253, pp. 470–483, 2011.
- C. J. Wiedermann, S. Dunzendorfer, L. U. Gaioni, F. Zaraca, and M. Joannidis, “Hyperoncotic colloids and acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis of randomized trials,” Critical Care, vol. 14, p. R191, 2010.
- M. Joannidis, W. Druml, L. G. Forni et al., “Prevention of acute kidney injury and protection of renal function in the intensive care unit,” Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 392–411, 2010.
- F. M. Brunkhorst, C. Engel, F. Bloos et al., “Intensive insulin therapy and pentastarch resuscitation in severe sepsis,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 2, pp. 125–139, 2008.
- J. Bouchard, S. B. Soroko, G. M. Chertow et al., “Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury,” Kidney International, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 422–427, 2009.
- J. R. Prowle and R. Bellomo, “Fluid administration and the kidney,” Current Opinion in Critical Care, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 332–336, 2010.
- A. D. Nagdev, R. C. Merchant, A. Tirado-Gonzalez, C. A. Sisson, and M. C. Murphy, “Emergency department bedside ultrasonographic measurement of the caval index for noninvasive determination of low central venous pressure,” Annals of Emergency Medicine, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 290–295, 2010.
- A. J. Weekes, H. M. Tassone, A. Babcock et al., “Comparison of serial qualitative and quantitative assessments of caval index and left ventricular systolic function during early fluid resuscitation of hypotensive emergency department patients,” Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 912–921, 2011.
- J. Albanèse, M. Leone, F. Garnier, A. Bourgoin, F. Antonini, and C. Martin, “Renal effects of norepinephrine in septic and nonseptic patients,” Chest, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 534–539, 2004.
- R. Bellomo and D. Di Giantomasso, “Noradrenaline and the kidney: friends or foes?” Critical Care, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 294–298, 2001.
- C. L. Holmes and K. R. Walley, “Bad medicine: low-dose dopamine in the ICU,” Chest, vol. 123, no. 4, pp. 1266–1275, 2003.
- J. O. Friedrich, N. Adhikari, M. S. Herridge, and J. Beyene, “Meta-analysis: low-dose dopamine increases urine output but does not prevent renal dysfunction or death,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 142, no. 7, pp. 510–524, 2005.
- K. M. Ho and D. J. Sheridan, “Meta-analysis of frusemide to prevent or treat acute renal failure,” British Medical Journal, vol. 333, no. 7565, pp. 420–423, 2006.
- S. M. Bagshaw, A. Delaney, M. Haase, W. A. Ghali, and R. Bellomo, “Loop diuretics in the management of acute renal failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Critical Care and Resuscitation, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 60–68, 2007.
- S. Sampath, J. L. Moran, P. L. Graham, S. Rockliff, A. D. Bersten, and K. R. Abrams, “The efficacy of loop diuretics in acute renal failure: assessment using Bayesian evidence synthesis techniques,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 2516–2524, 2007.
- P. H. J. Van Der Voort, E. C. Boerma, M. Koopmans et al., “Furosemide does not improve renal recovery after hemofiltration for acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a double blind randomized controlled trial,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 533–538, 2009.
- S. A. Olenchock Jr., P. H. U. Lee, T. Yehoshua, S. A. Murphy, J. Symes, and G. Tolis, “Impact of aprotinin on adverse clinical outcomes and mortality up to 12 years in a registry of 3,337 patients,” Annals of Thoracic Surgery, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 560–567, 2008.
- Z. H. Endre, R. J. Walker, J. W. Pickering et al., “Early intervention with erythropoietin does not affect the outcome of acute kidney injury (the EARLYARF trial).,” Kidney International, vol. 77, no. 11, pp. 1020–1030, 2010.
- S. M. Bagshaw, R. Bellomo, P. Devarajan et al., “Review article: acute kidney injury in critical illness,” Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, vol. 57, no. 11, pp. 985–998, 2010.
- M. S. Sever, R. Vanholder, and N. Lameire, “Management of crush-related injuries after disasters,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 10, pp. 1052–1063, 2006.
- O. S. Better, I. Rubinstein, J. M. Winaver, and J. P. Knochel, “Mannitol therapy revisited (1940–1997),” Kidney International, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 886–894, 1997.
- L. Brochard, F. Abroug, M. Brenner et al., “An official ATS/ERS/ESICM/SCCM/SRLF statement: prevention and management of acute renal failure in the ICU patient,” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 181, no. 10, pp. 1128–1155, 2010.
- A. Zagler, M. Azadpour, C. Mercado, and C. H. Hennekens, “N-Acetylcysteine and contrast-induced nephropathy: a meta-analysis of 13 randomized trials,” American Heart Journal, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 140–145, 2006.
- M. H. Duong, T. A. MacKenzie, and D. J. Malenka, “N-acetylcysteine prophylaxis significantly reduces the risk of radiocontrast-induced nephropathy: comprehensive meta-analysis,” Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 471–479, 2005.
- N. Pannu, B. Manns, H. Lee, and M. Tonelli, “Systematic review of the impact of N-acetylcysteine on contrast nephropathy,” Kidney International, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 1366–1374, 2004.
- A. Alonso, J. Lau, B. L. Jaber, A. Weintraub, and M. J. Sarnak, “Prevention of radiocontrast nephropathy with N-acetylcysteine in patients with chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials,” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2004.
- S. W. Murphy, B. J. Barrett, and P. S. Parfrey, “Contrast nephropathy,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 177–182, 2000.
- B. A. Mahoney, W. A. Smith, D. S. Lo, K. Tsoi, M. Tonelli, and C. M. Clase, “Emergency interventions for hyperkalaemia,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, article CD003235, 2005.
- A. C. Fry and K. Farrington, “Management of acute renal failure,” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 82, no. 964, pp. 106–116, 2006.
- J. A. Kraut and N. E. Madias, “Metabolic acidosis: pathophysiology, diagnosis and management,” Nature Reviews Nephrology, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 274–285, 2010.
- M. Haase, R. Bellomo, and A. Haase-Fielitz, “Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin,” Current Opinion in Critical Care, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 526–532, 2010.
- S. S. Soni, C. Ronco, N. Katz, and D. N. Cruz, “Early diagnosis of acute kidney injury: the promise of novel biomarkers,” Blood Purification, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 165–174, 2009.
- T. L. Nickolas, M. J. O'Rourke, J. Yang et al., “Sensitivity and specificity of a single emergency department measurement of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin for diagnosing acute kidney injury,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 148, no. 11, pp. 810–819, 2008.
Copyright © 2012 Jennifer Joslin and Marlies Ostermann. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.